scholarly journals Left ventricle geometry, atrial strain, ventricle strain and hemodynamics across aortic valve before and after transcatheter aortic valve replacements

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aslannif Roslan ◽  
YEE SIN TEY ◽  
Faten Aris A ◽  
Afif Ashari ◽  
Abdul Shaparudin A ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Linear Relationship ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Reverse Remodeling ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Valve Area

Background: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacements (TAVR) has become widespread throughout the world. To date there are no echocardiographic study of TAVR patients from Southeast Asia (SEA). We sought to evaluate 1) changes in echocardiographic and strain values pre and post TAVR 2) relationship between aortic stenosis (AS) severity and strain values, 3) left ventricle geometry in severe AS 4) relationship of flow rate to dimensionless index (DVI) and acceleration time (AT) and 5) effect of strains on outcome. Methods: Retrospective study of 112 TAVR patients in our center from 2009 to 2020. The echocardiographic and strain images pre (within 1 months), post (day after) and 6 months post TAVR were analyzed by expert echocardiographer. Results: The ejection fraction (EF) increased at 6 months (53.02 ± 12.12% to 56.35 ± 9.00%) (p=0.044). Interventricular septal thickness in diastole (IVSd) decreased (1.27 ± 0.21cm to 1.21 ± 0.23cm) (p=0.038) and left ventricle internal dimension in diastole (LVIDd) decreased from 4.77 ± 0.64cm to 4.49 ± 0.65cm (p = 0.001). No changes in stroke volume index (SVI pre vs 6 months p =0.187), but the flow rate increases (217.80 ± 57.61mls/s to 251.94 ± 69.59mls/s, p<0.001). Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) improved from -11.44 ± 4.23% to -13.94 ± 3.72% (p <0.001), Left Atrial Reservoir strain (Lar-S) increased from 17.44 ± 9.16% to 19.60 ± 8.77% (p=0.033). 8 patients (7.5%) had IVSd < 1.0cm, and 4 patients (3.7%) had normal left ventricle (LV) geometry. There was linear relationship between IVSd and mean PG (r=0.208, p=0.031), between GLS to aortic valve area (AVA) and aortic valve area index (AVAi) (r = – 0.305, p=0.001 and r= – 0.316, p = 0.001). There was also relationship between AT (r=-0.20, p=0.04) and DVI (r=0.35, p< 0.001) with flow rate. Patients who died late (after 6 months) had lower GLS at 6 months. (Alive; -13.94 ± 3.72% vs Died; -12.43 ± 4.19%, p= 0.001) Conclusion: At 6 months TAVR cause reverse remodeling of the LV with reduction in IVSd, LVIDd and improvement in GLS and LAr-S. There is linear relationship between GLS and AVA and between IVSd and AVA.

Abstract 17783: Improved Aortic Valve Area Calculation Using a Novel Biplane Echo Continuity Equation

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thorsten M Leucker ◽  
Edward P Shapiro
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Continuity Equation ◽  
Simple Calculation ◽  
Ventricular Outflow Tract ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Single Plane ◽  
Chamber View ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Valve Area

The aim of this study was to improve the accuracy of transthoracic echo- cardiographic (TTE) assessment of the aortic valve area (AVA) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). The traditional continuity equation (CE) for determining AVA requires a measurement of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area, which is calculated from a linear LVOT dimension using the parasternal long axis view, assuming circular geometry. However, routine use of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients undergoing evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has shown that the LVOT is elliptical rather than round. Assumption of circular geometry may introduce inaccuracies into AVA assessment. A total of 61 patients (76 ± 11 years of age, 61% men) with isolated calcific AS (mean gradient 42 ± 9 mm Hg; ejection fraction 56 ± 11%) underwent Doppler TTE as part of pre TAVR or aortic valvuloplasty evaluation. AVA was calculated by TTE using two near- perpendicular planes (parasternal long axis and apical five chamber view) to evaluate the LVOT. A modified CE was used to calculate AVA (cm2) = (π((D1 x D2)/4)x LVOT VTI)/(AV VTI) in order to account for the elliptical rather than round shape of the LVOT. AVA measurements from the traditional and modified CE were compared to invasive AVA assessment. Biplane (Figure, Panel B+D) vs. traditional single plane (Panel A+C) TTE measurement of the LVOT yielded a significantly improved positive correlation between TTE and invasive AVA assessment (r2=0.861 vs. 0.296) and a markedly reduced mean error (0.07 cm2 vs. 0.18 cm2), p<0.001. Utilizing the proposed modified continuity equation greatly improves the accuracy of TTE guided AVA measurements. This simple calculation can be performed using standard TTE without additional costly equipment (ie, biplane transducers), without additional echo views (ie, more sonographer time), and without the need to subject patients to further invasive or non- invasive testing (ie, TEE or MDCT).

scholarly journals Transvalvular Flow Rate Determines Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (15) ◽  
pp. 1758-1769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayooran Namasivayam ◽  
Wei He ◽  
Timothy W. Churchill ◽  
Romain Capoulade ◽  
Shiying Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Valve Area

scholarly journals Use of passive leg rise as an add-on to dobutamine in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Buffle ◽  
A Papadis ◽  
C Seiler ◽  
S F De Marchi
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Low Ejection Fraction ◽  
Valve Area

Abstract Background Dobutamine has been proposed for the assessment of low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLGAS). However, in 1/3 of patients, no increase in stroke volume index can be achieved by Dobutamine, thus hampering its diagnostic value. This study evaluated the manoeuvre of cardiac preload augmentation by passive leg rise (PLR) alone or on top of Dobutamine to increase stroke volume index (SVI) in patients with LFLGAS, particularly in paradoxical LFLGAS. Methods We examined 50 patients with LFLGAS. Patients were assigned to the paradoxical LFLGAS (Paradox) group if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was ≥50% (n=29) and to the LFLGAS with low ejection fraction (LEF) group if LVEF was &lt;50% (n=21). A modified Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed in all patients with the following 4 steps: Rest, PLR alone, maximal Dobutamine infusion rate alone (Dmax) and Dobutamine plus PLR (Dmax + PLR). Three SVI measurement methods were used: first the left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI) method, second the 2D Simpson's method, and third the 3D method. The corresponding aortic valve area (AVA) was obtained by the continuity equation. The increase of those values compared to measurements at rest was calculated and compared between the 3 stress steps. Results In the paradoxical LFLGAS group, delta SVI with Dmax assessed by both Simpson's (depicted in the figures) and 3D method was lowest compared to PLR and Dmax + PLR. PLR alone yielded an equally high delta SVI as Dmax + PLR in Simpson's and 3D, and was at least as high as Dmax across all methods. Dobutamine alone yielded the lowest delta transaortic aortic valve VTI. The highest delta aortic valve area resulted for Dmax + PLR. In the LEF group, the three stress steps yielded an equally high delta SVI with Simpson's method. Dmax never yielded a higher delta SVI than PLR alone. The yielded delta SVI was the highest for Dmax + PLR for both LVOT VTI and 3d method, although the difference was overall not as strong as in the Paradox group. Conclusions In patients with paradoxical LFLGAS, Dobutamine alone is inadequate for testing the potential of aortic valve opening augmentation. Instead, PLR alone or the addition of PLR plus Dobutamine should be used for that purpose. In low LVEF, adding PLR to Dobutamine also seems useful although its diagnostic added value is less evident than in the Paradox group. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Foundation Paradox group Low ejection fraction group

scholarly journals An Alternative Method to Calculate Simplified Projected Aortic Valve Area at Normal Flow Rate

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Sofia Silva Moura Ferreira ◽  
Nádia Moreira ◽  
Rita Ferreira ◽  
Sofia Mendes ◽  
Rui Martins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Normal Flow ◽  
Alternative Method ◽  
Valve Area

scholarly journals The evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Jasinski ◽  
Karol Miszalski-Jamka ◽  
Radoslaw Gocol ◽  
Izabella Wenzel-Jasinska ◽  
Grzegorz Bielicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Bicuspid Aortic Valve ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Reverse Remodeling ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Valve Area

Abstract Background: The incompetent bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) can be replaced or repaired using various surgical techniques. This study sought to assess the efficacy of external annuloplasty and postoperative reverse remodeling using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and compare the mid-term results of external and subcommissural annuloplasty. Methods: Out of a total of 200 BAV repair performed between 2004 and 2018, 21 consecutive patients (median age 54 years) with regurgitation requiring valve repair with annuloplasty without concomitant aortic root surgery were prospectively referred for CMR and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) one year after the operation. Two aortic annulus stabilization techniques were used: external, circumferential annuloplasty (EA), and subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA). Results: 11 patients received EA and 10 patients were treated using SCA. There was no in-hospital mortality and all patients survived the follow-up period. CMR showed strong correlation between postoperative aortic recurrent regurgitant fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r=0.62; p=0.003) as well as left ventricular ejection fraction (r=-0.53; p=0.01). Patients treated with EA as compared with SCA had larger anatomic aortic valve area measured by CMR (3.5cm2 (2.5; 4.0) vs. 2.5cm2 (2.0; 3.4); p=0.04). In both EA and SCA group, aortic valve area below 3.5cm2 correlated with no regurgitation recurrency. EA (vs. SCA) was associated with lower peak transvalvular aortic gradients (10mmHg (6; 17) vs. 21mmHg (15; 27); p=0.04). Conclusions: The repair of the bicuspid aortic valve provides significant mid-term postoperative reverse remodeling, provided no recurrent regurgitation and durable reduction annuloplasty can be achieved. External, circumferential annuloplasty is associated with better hemodynamics compared to subcommissural annuloplasty.

scholarly journals At what flow rate does aortic valve gradient become severely elevated? Implications for guideline recommendations on aortic valve area cutoffs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilbert Aronow ◽  
Ayesha Salahuddin ◽  
Daniel Spevack
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Valve Area

IntroductionSince many patients with AVA < 1.0 cm2 do not manifest a mAVG > 40 mmHg, we sought to determine the AVA at which mAVG tends to exceed 40 mmHg in a sample of subjects with varied transvalvular flow rates.Material and methodsWe selected 200 subjects with an AVA< 1.0 cm2. The sample was selected to include subjects with a varied mean systolic flow (MSF) rates. Linear regression was performed to determine the relationship between MSF and mAVG. Since this relationship varied by AVA, the regression was stratified by AVA (critical <0.6 cm2, severe 0.6-0.79 cm2 , moderately severe 0.8-0.99 cm2)ResultsThe study sample was 79 ± 12 years-old and was 60% female. The MSF rate at which mAVG tended to exceed 40 mmHg was 120 ml/s for critical AVA, 183 ml/s for severe AVA and 257 ml/s for moderately severe AVA. Those with moderately severe AVA rarely (8%) had a mAVG > 40 mmHg at a wide range of MSF. In contrast, those with severe AVA typically (75%) had mAVG > 40 mmHg when MSF was normal (>200 ml/s). Those with critical AVA frequently (44%) had mAVG > 40 mmHg, even when MSF was reduced.ConclusionsAVA > 0.8 cm2 was rarely associated with mAVG > 40 mmHg, even when transvalvular flow rate was normal. Consideration should therefore be given to either raising the cutoff AVA or lowering the mAVG at which aortic stenosis is considered severe.

scholarly journals Aortic Valve Area Index

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidan W. Flynn ◽  
David I. Silverman
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Valve Area
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document