scholarly journals Bull Trout, Salvelinus confluentus, and North American Porcupine, Erethizon dorsatum, Interaction in the Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories

2007 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 437
Author(s):  
Peter A. Cott ◽  
Neil J. Mochnacz

Evidence of an interaction between a Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) and a North American Porcupine (Erethizon dorsatum), was observed during a fisheries survey in the Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories. A male Bull Trout with porcupine quills imbedded in its mouth was collected. It is speculated that this occurred when the trout was aggressively defending its territory from a perceived threat – a swimming porcupine. This is the first documented account of an interaction between a fish and a porcupine.

1982 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 2020-2027 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. Morris ◽  
J. D. Aitken

The Proterozoic stratigraphic column of the Mackenzie Mountains is dominated by two main successions, the platformal "Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup" beneath, and the Windermere-equivalent Rapitan Group and younger strata, of rift-depression and slope origin, above. The former succession is at least partly older than 770 Ma, the latter younger than 770 Ma. These two main successions are locally separated by an unconformity-bounded succession, the "copper cycle." An important question is whether the copper cycle is more closely related in time and in origin to the older or the younger main succession. Determination of the paleomagnetism of the basaltic lavas locally preserved at the top of the Little Dal Group (top of the Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup) and comparison of their remanence directions with those published for other rocks bearing on the question were thought to be one way of shedding light on this question. Accordingly, paleomagnetic investigation of 10 sites in the Keele River area and six sites in the Thundercloud Range area was undertaken to obtain the remanence direction related to the initial extrusion of the lavas. Coherent directional groupings were only obtained from Little Dal lavas in the Keele River area. Of the three magnetizations found, LD-L (D = 304°, I = 20°, α95 = 7°) is assumed to represent the magnetization acquired on crystallization of the lavas. If this assumption is correct, the significant difference from the direction LD-A (D = 265°, I = 26°, α95 = 4°) reported elsewhere for strata low in the Little Dal Group suggests either that the lavas significantly postdate the group or that significant movement of the North American plate occurred during accumulation of the 2 km or so of platformal strata between the lower Little Dal beds and the lavas. The new results presented here also admit the conclusion that the Little Dal lavas do not represent the same igneous events as diabase intrusions dated at about 770 Ma that cut the lower Little Dal.


2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 257
Author(s):  
Lenora M. Dombro ◽  
Earl Perez-Foust ◽  
Daniel Roddy ◽  
Daryl E. Mergen ◽  
Robert A. Gitzen

Virology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 331 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annabel Rector ◽  
Ruth Tachezy ◽  
Koenraad Van Doorslaer ◽  
Tracey MacNamara ◽  
Robert D. Burk ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1205-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Archibald ◽  
Alan H. Clark ◽  
Edward Farrar ◽  
U Khin Zaw

K–Ar dating of magmatic biotite, and of hydrothermal biotite and muscovite, demonstrates that quartz monzonite intrusion and exoskarn scheelite mineralization at Cantung, N.W.T., took place over a brief interval in the Upper Cretaceous (ca. 91 Ma). The regional age relationships of magmatic and ore-forming activity in the Logan–Mackenzie Mountains are poorly defined, but it is tentatively inferred that tungsten mineralization may have been related to a late stage in the plutonic development of the area.


1993 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Donald ◽  
David J. Alger

Indigenous lacustrine populations of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) and lake trout (S. namaycush) are spatially separated within the southern part of the zone of distributional overlap (northern Montana, southwestern Alberta, and east-central British Columbia). In this area, lake trout occurred primarily in mountain lakes of 1032–1500 m elevation, while bull trout were found primarily in lakes between 1500 and 2200 m. Introductions of lake trout in the twentieth century and data obtained from beyond the study area indicated that both fishes can establish significant allopatric populations (more than 5% of the catch) in large, deep lakes (>8 ha in area and >8 m deep) over a wide elevation range. We tested the hypothesis that lake trout displace or exclude bull trout from lakes by determining the outcome of introductions of lake trout into two lakes that supported indigenous bull trout. Lake trout were introduced into Bow Lake in 1964, and by 1992 the bull trout population was decimated there and in another lake (Hector) situated 15 km downstream. Thus, lake trout can displace bull trout and may prevent bull trout from becoming established in certain low-elevation lakes. Population age-structure analyses also suggest that lake trout adversely affected bull trout. Bull trout populations in sympatry with lake trout, including the one extirpated from Hector Lake, had few old fish (18% were more than 5 years old; N = 40 fish from three lakes) compared with allopatric populations (49% were more than 5 years old; N = 235 fish from seven lakes). Niche overlap and the potential for competition between the two char species were substantial. In lakes with trophic structure ranging from simple to complex, bull trout and lake trout fed on similar foods and had similar ecological efficiencies (growth rates). Predation by lake trout on bull trout was not documented during the study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document