scholarly journals Book Reviews: Supporting Identity, Diversity and Language in the Early Years, Researching Racism in Education: Politics, Theory and Practice, Early Childhood Services: Theory, Policy and Practice, Rethinking Gender in Early Childhood Education

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-129
Author(s):  
Judith K. Bernhard ◽  
Julie Kaomea ◽  
Gail Boldt ◽  
Sally Barnes
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Early Childhood Education ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Childhood Education ◽  
Education Politics ◽  
Racism In Education

scholarly journals Inspiring Environmentally Responsible Preschool Children through the Implementation of the National Quality Framework: Uncovering what Lies between Theory and Practice

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 12-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krista Pollock ◽  
Jane Warren ◽  
Peter Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Early Childhood Education ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Childhood Education ◽  
National Quality ◽  
Environmentally Responsible ◽  
Quality Framework

EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION FOR environmental sustainability (ECEfES) has become significant in the early years, as highlighted by the inclusion of ECEfES in Australia's first and current National Quality Framework (NQF) for early childhood education and care (ECEC). This article reports on the major findings from a case study (Pollock, 2014), which aimed to uncover what lies between theory and practice, as ECEC educators attempt to support young children to become environmentally responsible, through the implementation of the NQF. This article discusses some of the findings from an analysis of the documents central to the NQF as well as semi-structured interviews with three university-qualified educators. Thematic analysis revealed that although challenging educators in some respects, the introduction of the NQF has enhanced their sustainability practices. This has emphasised the importance of listening to the voices of young children, a ‘whole of settings' approach, and engaging in reflection.

scholarly journals Conducting Research in Early Childhood Education: A Review of Guy Roberts-Holmes’ Doing Your Early Years Research Project: A Step-by-Step Guide

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Rogers
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Early Childhood Education ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Technical College ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Early Years ◽  
College Level ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Childhood Education ◽  
Conducting Research

Research should be an important component of courses at the college level. Doing Your Early Years Research Project by Guy Roberts-Holmes provides the theory and practice for technical college and undergraduate students to conduct qualitative research in the field of early childhood education. It truly is a step-by-step guide that helps students create a topic that is both personally and professionally meaningful, teaches them how to review the literature, collect data, make meaning of the data, and create the final research project. Researchers will finish this book and project knowing they made a positive difference in children’s lives.

scholarly journals Editorial: e-Learning and knowledge management in the early years: Where are we and where should we go

2009 ◽  
pp. 245-250
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Early Childhood Education ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Childhood Education ◽  
E Learning ◽  
The Media

E-learning and knowledge management are increasingly accepted as established practices in the field of early childhood education. Living in the age of Web 2.0, young children can learn through experience, application, and conversation in community, physically or virtually, with peers, parents, teachers, and other adults, beyond the classroom and across the media. These concepts are of growing interest in communities of practice and knowledge networks. Although most early childhood educators recognize and practice some kinds of e-learning, most have yet to master the basic theory and practice of knowledge management. What does e-learning mean for young children? How do we apply knowledge management in early childhood setting? These questions are of great importance and a special collection such as this issue will be beneficial to take stock of the ongoing practices as well as to explore future directions in the field. This issue will combine knowledge management and e-learning with early childhood education to provide a valuable arena for the discussion and dissemination of this topic and related studies.

scholarly journals Professional Love in Early Childhood Education: the experience of Aotearoa New Zealand

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Lorraine Grace Stewart-MacKenzie
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Early Childhood Education ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Childhood Education ◽  
Care Givers ◽  
Aotearoa New Zealand ◽  
Nation Wide Survey

Abstract Love is essential for human psycho-social development, in particular in the early years. Just as the love of parents/care-givers and others in the home setting is vital, there is increasing recognition that love is important for infants, toddlers and young children in early childhood education settings (ECES). However, love demonstrated by teaching professionals continues to be under-researched (Dalli 2005; Page 2017a). As a result, educational policy and practice guidelines are still embryonic, or may not yet exist (Dalli et al 2011; Hughs 2013). This article presents findings from a nation-wide survey of early childhood professionals in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) undertaken in 2020 which explored early childhood teachers’ understandings of professional love in ECES in NZ; the first such survey undertaken. Respondents emphasised that a professional approach to love is important despite many responses indicating love is still viewed as unprofessional by early childhood education (ECE) teachers and managers. A key finding of this research is that understanding the nature of love in ECES is required in order to legitimise professional love and thereby inform policy and practice. Findings from the research suggest a way forward.

scholarly journals Understanding Early Childhood Science Education: Comparative Analysis of Australian and Finnish Curricula

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sari Havu-Nuutinen ◽  
Sarika Kewalramani ◽  
Nikolai Veresov ◽  
Susanna Pöntinen ◽  
Sini Kontkanen
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Science Education ◽  
Early Childhood Education ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Science Curriculum ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Childhood Education ◽  
Curriculum Framework ◽  
International Comparative

AbstractThis research is a comparative study of Finnish and Australian science curricula in early childhood education (EC). The study aims to figure out the constructivist components of the science curriculum in two countries as well as locate the similarities and differences in the rationale and aims, contents, learning outcomes, learning activities, teacher’s role and assessment. The curriculum analysis framework developed by Van den Akker (2003) was used as a methodological framework for the curricula analysis. Based on the theory-driven content analyses, findings show that both countries have several components of constructivist curriculum, but not always clearly focused on science education. The Australian Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) integrates children’s science learning within their five specific learning outcomes, whereas the Finnish national core curriculum for early childhood education and care has no defined learning outcomes in general. The Finnish curriculum more clearly than EYLF encompasses science and environmental education as a learning domain, within which children participate in targeted scientific activities to gain procedural knowledge in specific environmental-related concepts. More focus should be turned to the teachers’ role and assessment, which are not determined in science context in both countries. This international comparative study calls for the need of a considered EC curriculum framework that more explicitly has science domains with specifically defined rationale, aims, content areas, learning outcomes and assessment criteria. The implications lie in providing early childhood educators with tangible and theoretically solid curriculum framework and resources in order to foster scientific thinking in young children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document