scholarly journals The Wholesale Fruit and Vegetable Markets of New York City

1940 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 802
Author(s):  
R. G. Bressler ◽  
D. O. Hammerberg ◽  
William C. Crow ◽  
W. T. Calhoun ◽  
J. W. Park
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Casey J. Kelley ◽  
Karla L. Hanson ◽  
Grace A. Marshall ◽  
Leah C. Volpe ◽  
Stephanie Jilcott Pitts ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To examine cross-sectional associations between farmers’ market shopping behaviors and objectively measured and self-reported fruit and vegetable (FV) intake among rural North Carolina (NC) and New York City (NYC) shoppers. Design: Cross-sectional intercept surveys were used to assess self-reported FV intake and three measures of farmers’ market shopping behavior: (1) frequency of purchasing FV, (2) variety of FV purchased, and (3) dollars spent on FV. Skin carotenoids, a non-invasive biomarker for FV intake, were objectively measured using pressure-mediated reflection spectroscopy. Associations between farmers’ market shopping behaviors and FV intake were examined using regression models that controlled for demographic variables (e.g., age, sex, race, smoking status, education, income, and state). Setting: Farmers’ markets (n=17 markets) in rural NC and NYC. Participants: A convenience sample of 645 farmers’ market shoppers. Results: Farmers’ market shoppers in NYC purchased a greater variety of FV and had higher skin carotenoid scores compared to shoppers in rural NC. Among all shoppers, there was a positive, statistically significant association between self-reported frequency of shopping at farmers’ markets and self-reported as well as objectively assessed FV intake. The variety of FV purchased and farmers’ market spending on FV also were positively associated with self-reported FV intake, but not skin carotenoids. Conclusion: Those who shop for FV more frequently at a farmers’ markets, purchase a greater variety of FV, and spend more money on FV have higher self-reported, and in some cases higher objectively measured FV intake. Further research is needed to understand these associations and test causality.


1940 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Reavis Cox ◽  
William C. Crow

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Breck ◽  
Kamila Kiszko ◽  
Olivia Martinez ◽  
Courtney Abrams ◽  
Brian Elbel

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (15) ◽  
pp. 2712-2721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren EW Olsho ◽  
Gayle Holmes Payne ◽  
Deborah Klein Walker ◽  
Sabrina Baronberg ◽  
Jan Jernigan ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveThe present study examines the impact of Health Bucks, a farmers’ market incentive programme, on awareness of and access to farmers’ markets, and fruit and vegetable purchase and consumption in low-income New York City neighbourhoods.DesignThe evaluation used two primary data collection methods: (i) an on-site point-of-purchase survey of farmers’ market shoppers; and (ii) a random-digit-dial telephone survey of residents in neighbourhoods where the programme operates. Additionally, we conducted a quasi-experimental analysis examining differential time trends in consumption before and after programme introduction using secondary Community Health Survey (CHS) data.SettingNew York City farmers’ markets and communities.SubjectsFarmers’ market shoppers (n 2287) completing point-of-purchase surveys in a representative sample of New York City farmers’ markets in 2010; residents (n 1025) completing random-digit-dial telephone survey interviews in 2010; and respondents (n 35 606) completing CHS interviews in 2002, 2004, 2008 and 2009.ResultsGreater Health Bucks exposure was associated with: (i) greater awareness of farmers’ markets; (ii) increased frequency and amount of farmers’ market purchases; and (iii) greater likelihood of a self-reported year-over-year increase in fruit and vegetable consumption. However, our CHS analysis did not detect impacts on consumption.ConclusionsWhile our study provides promising evidence that use of farmers’ market incentives is associated with increased awareness and use of farmers’ markets, additional research is needed to better understand impacts on fruit and vegetable consumption.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 1197-1205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darby Jack ◽  
Kathryn Neckerman ◽  
Ofira Schwartz-Soicher ◽  
Gina S Lovasi ◽  
James Quinn ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveRecommendations for fruit and vegetable consumption are largely unmet. Lower socio-economic status (SES), neighbourhood poverty and poor access to retail outlets selling healthy foods are thought to predict lower consumption. The objective of the present study was to assess the interrelationships between these risk factors as predictors of fruit and vegetable consumption.DesignCross-sectional multilevel analyses of data on fruit and vegetable consumption, socio-demographic characteristics, neighbourhood poverty and access to healthy retail food outlets.SettingSurvey data from the 2002 and 2004 New York City Community Health Survey, linked by residential zip code to neighbourhood data.SubjectsAdult survey respondents (n 15 634).ResultsOverall 9·9 % of respondents reported eating ≥5 servings of fruits or vegetables in the day prior to the survey. The odds of eating ≥5 servings increased with higher income among women and with higher educational attainment among men and women. Compared with women having less than a high-school education, the OR was 1·12 (95 % CI 0·82, 1·55) for high-school graduates, 1·95 (95 % CI 1·43, 2·66) for those with some college education and 2·13 (95 % CI 1·56, 2·91) for college graduates. The association between education and fruit and vegetable consumption was significantly stronger for women living in lower- v. higher-poverty zip codes (P for interaction < 0·05). The density of healthy food outlets did not predict consumption of fruits or vegetables.ConclusionsHigher SES is associated with higher consumption of produce, an association that, in women, is stronger for those residing in lower-poverty neighbourhoods.


2013 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 1282-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erikka Loftfield ◽  
Stella Yi ◽  
Christine J Curtis ◽  
Katherine Bartley ◽  
Susan M Kansagra

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Casey J. Kelley ◽  
Karla L. Hanson ◽  
Grace A. Marshall ◽  
Leah C. Volpe ◽  
Stephanie Jilcott Pitts ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Fruit and vegetable (FV) intake is associated with reduced risk of numerous chronic diseases. The community food environment can support FV intake through enhanced access via food outlets, such as farmers’ markets. This paper examines cross-sectional associations between farmers’ market shopping behaviors and objectively-measured and self-reported FV intake to better understand whether farmers’ market shopping behavior relates to FV intake among farmers’ market shoppers. Methods: Farmers’ market shoppers were surveyed at 17 farmers’ markets in rural North Carolina and New York City. A questionnaire assessed self-reported FV intake and three measures of farmers’ market shopping behavior: (1) frequency, (2) variety of FV purchased, and (3) dollars spent on FV. Skin carotenoid status, a non-invasive biomarker for FV intake, was objectively measured using pressure-mediated reflection spectroscopy. Associations between shopping behaviors at farmers’ markets and FV intake were examined using regression models that controlled for individual demographics (age, sex, race, smoking status, education, income, and site). Results: Farmers’ market shoppers in New York City purchased a greater variety of FV and had higher skin carotenoid scores than in North Carolina. There was a positive, statistically significant association between self-reported frequency of shopping at farmers’ markets and both self-reported and objectively assessed FV intake. We also observed that variety of FV purchased and farmers’ market spending were positively associated with self-reported FV intake, but not skin carotenoid status.Conclusion: Those who shop more frequently at a farmers’ markets, purchase a greater variety of FV, and spend more money on FV have higher self-reported, and in some cases, higher objectively measured FV intake. Further research is needed to understand these associations and test causality.


Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhouyang Lou ◽  
Heesun Eom ◽  
Junxiu Liu ◽  
Stella S Yi ◽  
Rienna Russo ◽  
...  

Background: Both high sugar intake and low fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption increase the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes can reduce sugar intake, whereas FV subsidies increase FV consumption. Several cities in the US have proposed an innovative policy that used the SSB tax revenue towards FV subsidies. It is unclear what the long-term health and economic impact this innovative policy could have in large cities such as New York City (NYC). Objective: To project lifetime CHDs averted and costs if a penny-per-ounce SSB tax were used to subsidize FV incentives in NYC using a validated microsimulation model of cardiovascular disease. Methods: We used the SHINE CVD model to compare the cost and CHD outcomes of a combination of SSB tax and FV subsidy policy with only SSB tax, only FV subsidy, and no policy from a healthcare sector perspective, respectively. Population demographics and health profiles were estimated using data from the 2013-2014 NYC Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We simulated 10,000 adults starting at age 40. CHD risk factor trajectories and risk of incident CHD events were derived from six pooled prospective U.S. cohorts. Policy effects and price elasticity were derived from recent meta-analyses. SSB tax (penny-per-ounce) and FV subsidy were modeled to directly affect incidence rates of CHD events. Medical costs were included and discounted at 3%. Results: Compared to the non-policy scenario over the simulated lifetime, the SHINE CVD model projected that the policy intervention with SSB taxes only would prevent 62 per 10,000 (95% CI: 57 - 67) CHD events at a penny-per-ounce rate, the intervention with FV subsidies only would prevent 28 per 10,000 (95% CI: 24-34), and the combined policy would prevent 91 CHD events (95% CI: 87 - 96). Total medical cost savings over the simulation period ranged from $22.5 million (95% CI: $21.5 - $23.6 million), $13.1 million (95% CI: $12.3 - $13.8million), and $37.9 million (95% CI: $36.5 - $39.4million), or $0.45 million/year, $0.27 million/year, $0.75 million/year for SSB taxes only, FV subsidies only, and the combined policy, respectively. Conclusion: Using a computer simulation model, we showed how converting SSB tax revenues into FV subsidies could result in substantial benefits within the NYC population in terms of CHD outcomes and overall healthcare cost savings. Results from the SHINE CVD model may inform the ongoing policy-making efforts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document