Marketing Cooperatives in the U.S.: Membership Policies, Market Power, and Antitrust Policy

1966 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
James G. Youde ◽  
Peter G. Helmberger
Agribusiness ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 771-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanjin Chung ◽  
Seongjin Park ◽  
Jungmin Lee
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry J. Seldon ◽  
Chulho Jung ◽  
Roberto J. Cavazos
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia A Montgomery

This paper documents the significant presence of diversified firms in the U.S. economy and presents three views on why firms diversify. The market power view argues that firms diversify to wield conglomerate power across markets. The agency view argues that diversification is undertaken by managers pursuing their own interests at the expense of the firm's owners. The resource view argues that firms diversify in response to excess capacity in productive factors. A review of recent empirical research finds little support for the market-power view and a substantial amount of evidence that is consistent with the agency and resource views.


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 559-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Nebesky ◽  
B. Starr McMullen ◽  
Man-Keung Lee

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson Villoria ◽  
Rachael Garrett ◽  
Florian Gollnow ◽  
Kimberly Carlson

Abstract Supply chain policies that leverage the upstream market power of trading companies and importing countries offer great promise to address forest clearing1,2 in regions of rapid commodity expansion but weak forest governance3,4. Yet leakage—when deforestation is not eliminated but instead pushed to other regions—is a potentially major but unquantified factor that could dilute the global effectiveness of regionally successful supply chain policies5,6. We find substantial domestic leakage rates (43-50%) induced by zero deforestation policy implementation in Brazil’s soy sector, but insignificant cross-border leakage (<3%) due to the interdependence of soy production in the U.S. and Brazil. Currently implemented zero-deforestation policies in the Brazilian soy sector offset 0.9% of global and 4% of Brazilian deforestation from 2011-2016. However, completely eliminating deforestation from the supply chains of all firms exporting soy to the EU or China over the same period could have reduced global deforestation by 2% and Brazilian deforestation by 9%. If major tropical commodity importers adopt policies that require traders to eliminate deforestation from their supply chains, as currently proposed in the EU, it could help bend the curve on global forest loss.


2019 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 138-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Kanieski Silva ◽  
Frederick W. Cubbage ◽  
Ronalds Gonzalez ◽  
Robert C. Abt

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 871-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Stelzner ◽  
Mayuri Chaturvedi

Abstract Starting in the 1980s, market concentration began to rise dramatically decreasing competition and increasing market power for the firms that remain. Such developments have important effects on a number of economic variables such as the efficiency of our economy and income inequality. Thus, it is important to ask: how has the administration of antitrust policy changed over the last half century? To shed more light on these important questions, we explore both change in policy outline by the Department of Justice in its Horizontal Merger Guidelines and change in administrative actions looking at both secondary requests for mergers and acquisitions of different sizes, and pre, post and change in Herfindahl–Hirschman Index in mergers and acquisitions contested by the Department of Justice through the courts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document