Effects of a Peer-Mediated Program on Reading Skill Acquisition for Two-Way Bilingual First-Grade Classrooms

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Beth Calhoon ◽  
Stephanie Al Otaiba ◽  
David Cihak ◽  
Amber King ◽  
Annalise Avalos
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Early Literacy ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Skill Acquisition ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
English Language ◽  
First Grade ◽  
Reading Program ◽  
Word Fluency

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a supplemental peer-mediated reading program on reading achievement of first graders ( N = 76) in a two-way bilingual immersion (TWBI) program. Nearly 80% of students were Hispanic; of these, 24 were identified as English language learners (ELLs). Classrooms were randomly assigned to peer-assisted learning strategies (PALS) or contrast condition. PALS students participated in a 30-hour peer-mediated early literacy intervention that was conducted three times a week. Results showed statistically significant differences, with large effect sizes favoring PALS on phoneme segmentation fluency, nonsense word fluency, and oral reading fluency. Additionally, disaggregated results analyzed by subgroups (ELLs and English proficient) revealed a differential pattern in response to intervention. Implications of findings in relation to research and practice are discussed.

scholarly journals The Fluency of Oral Reading with Natural Reader Software

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-163
Author(s):  
Varia Virdania Virdaus ◽  
Saiful Rifa’i
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Oral Reading Fluency ◽  
English Language ◽  
English Education ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Grade Levels ◽  
Group 2

This recent investigation aims to find out whether natural reader software improves oral reading fluency for English language learners. In this recent study, the natural reader software was considered as independent variable and the oral reading fluency score was regarded as dependent one. The subjects of this investigation were students of English education study program. The number of the students of group (1) were 32 students who are taught using natural reader software and this group was considered to be an experimental group and The number of the students of group (2) were35 students who are taught without using natural reader software this group was considered to be control group. This study has proven that this software can significantly prove that most of  students have more accurate and more precise reading skills. This study has revealed that oral reading fluency instruction does improve global reading proficiency at all grade levels

Reading Instruction for Elementary-Age Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Academic and Behavioral Outcomes

2005 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally M. Barton-Arwood ◽  
Joseph H. Wehby ◽  
Katherine B. Falk
Keyword(s):  
Reading Achievement ◽  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Behavioral Disorders ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
Reading Intervention ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Social Behaviors ◽  
Reading Program ◽  
Future Research

This study evaluated the effects of a reading intervention on the reading achievement and social behaviors of 6 third-grade students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Reading instruction occurred 4 days a week using the Horizons Fast Track reading program and Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies. Analyses indicated variable improvements in basic reading skills with limited transfer to oral reading fluency. Outcomes for social behaviors indicated that changes in total inappropriate behavior were not directly related to the reading intervention; improved engagement appeared related to intervention but not necessarily reading achievement. Results are discussed in the context of possible reasons for differential responding and implications for practice and future research.

Determining English Language Learners' Response to Intervention: Questions and Some Answers

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Linan-Thompson ◽  
Paul T. Cirino ◽  
Sharon Vaughn
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
English Language Learners ◽  
Response To Intervention ◽  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
English Language ◽  
First Grade ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Not At Risk

Using an extant database, we examined three grade 1 criteria for identifying response to intervention (RTI) in English language learners (ELLs): (a) set benchmark criteria with a standard score above 95 (37th %ile) on both decoding and comprehension measures and a raw score of 40 or more correct words per minute (CWPM) on oral reading fluency; (b) discrepancy benchmark criteria, with performance on these measures at or above the mean of not-at-risk peers; and (c) discrepancy slope criteria, with growth during grade 1 on these measures at or above the mean of not-at-risk peers. The sample consisted of 81 students (41 intervention, 40 comparison) who were bilingual (Spanish/English) and were part of a supplemental reading instruction study during first grade. The three grade 1 criteria were evaluated in relation to a set benchmark criteria in grade 2. Results indicated that approximately 80% of the students did not meet any criteria in either year, but that the discrepancy slope criteria in grade 1 were most predictive of set benchmark criteria in grade 2. Recognizing that we applied highly stringent criteria, implications and issues are presented related to using RTI with ELLs to facilitate decision making about further intervention and referral for special education.

LONGITUDINAL PREDICTION OF 1ST AND 2ND GRADE ENGLISH ORAL READING FLUENCY IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS: WHICH EARLY READING AND LANGUAGE SKILLS ARE BETTER PREDICTORS?

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily J. Solari ◽  
Terese C. Aceves ◽  
Ignacio Higareda ◽  
Cara Richards-Tutor ◽  
Alexis L. Filippini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Oral Reading Fluency ◽  
English Language ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Early Reading

Early Reading Intervention: Responding to the Learning Needs of Young at-Risk English Language Learners

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Klett Gyovai ◽  
Gwendolyn Cartledge ◽  
Lefki Kourea ◽  
Amanda Yurick ◽  
Lenwood Gibson
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Early Literacy ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Reading Intervention ◽  
English Language ◽  
Early Reading ◽  
First Grade ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Baseline Design ◽  
Early Reading Intervention

This study examined the effects of a supplemental early reading intervention on the beginning literacy skills of 12 kindergarten/first-grade urban English language learners (ELLs). The Early Reading Intervention (ERI; Simmons & Kame'enui, 2003) was the instructional intervention used with all students. A multiple-baseline design across students was used to investigate the effects of the instruction on phoneme segmentation fluency (PSF) and nonsense word fluency (NWF), as measured by the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS; Good & Kaminski, 2002). Data analyses showed that all students increased in the number of phonemes segmented and the number of letter sounds produced correctly. Gains were commensurate with the amount of instruction received.

scholarly journals Examining Agreement and Longitudinal Stability Among Traditional and RTI-Based Definitions of Reading Disability Using the Affected-Status Agreement Statistic

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica S. Brown Waesche ◽  
Christopher Schatschneider ◽  
Jon K. Maner ◽  
Yusra Ahmed ◽  
Richard K. Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Early Literacy ◽  
Reading Disability ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Low Achievement ◽  
Word Fluency ◽  
Longitudinal Stability ◽  
Poor Reading ◽  
Reading Measures

Rates of agreement among alternative definitions of reading disability and their 1- and 2-year stabilities were examined using a new measure of agreement, the affected-status agreement statistic. Participants were 288,114 first through third grade students. Reading measures were Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Oral Reading Fluency and Nonsense Word Fluency, and six levels of severity of poor reading were examined (25th, 20th, 15th, 10th, 5th, and 3rd percentile ranks). Four definitions were compared, including traditional unexpected low achievement and three response-to-intervention-based definitions: low achievement, low growth, and dual discrepancy. Rates of agreement were variable but only poor to moderate overall, with poorest agreement between unexpected low achievement and the other definitions. Longitudinal stability was poor, with poorest stability for the low growth definition. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

scholarly journals The effect of COVID on Oral Reading Fluency during the 2020-2021 Academic Year

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Domingue ◽  
Madison Dell ◽  
David Nathan Lang ◽  
Rebecca Deffes Silverman ◽  
Jason D Yeatman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Reading Ability ◽  
Oral Reading Fluency ◽  
English Language ◽  
Rapid Assessment ◽  
School Year ◽  
Policy Interventions

Education has faced unprecedented disruption during the COVID pandemic. Understanding how students have adapted as we have entered a different phase of the pandemic and some communities have returned to more typical schooling will inform a suite of policy interventions and subsequent research. We use data from an oral reading fluency assessment-a rapid assessment taking only a few minutes that measures a fundamental reading skill-to examine COVID’s effects on children’s reading ability during the pandemic. We find that students in the first 200 days of the 2020-2021 school year tended to experience slower growth in ORF relative to pre-pandemic years. We also observed slower growth in districts with a high percentage of English language learners (ELLs) and/or students eligible for free and reduced-price lunch (FRL).

A Quasiexperimental Evaluation of Two Versions of First-Grade PALS: One With and One Without Repeated Reading

2020 ◽  
pp. 001440292092182
Author(s):  
Douglas Fuchs ◽  
Eunsoo Cho ◽  
Jessica R. Toste ◽  
Lynn S. Fuchs ◽  
Jennifer K. Gilbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
Word Reading ◽  
Repeated Reading ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Cluster Randomized Trial ◽  
First Grade ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Reading Program ◽  
Cluster Randomized

We attempted to strengthen an evidence-based, peer-mediated, first-grade reading program (First Grade Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies [PALS]) by modestly revising its content and adding a repeated-reading (RR) component. In a cluster-randomized trial, we conducted a component analysis of the revised program by creating two versions of it. “PALS+Fluency” represented the modified program with an RR component, whereas “PALS-Only” represented the same program without RR. We tested the efficacy of the two PALS versions together against controls and against each other to determine if peer-mediated RR had “value added.” With moderator analyses, we further explored whether the PALS programs benefited weaker and stronger readers alike. Thirty-three first-grade classroom teachers (and 491 students) from eight urban schools were randomly assigned to the three study groups within their schools. The PALS-Only and PALS+Fluency programs ran for 22 weeks. Multilevel modeling showed that the combined effects of the two PALS programs on phonological awareness (PA), word reading, and reading fluency were superior to those of controls. Students’ pretreatment PA moderated combined program effects on PA and word reading, indicating stronger effects for students with weaker PA. PALS-Only students improved PA skills (over PALS+Fluency students) with stronger effects for those with weaker pretreatment PA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document