A Treatise on the Law of Marriage and Divorce

1924 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 454
Author(s):  
Karl Nickerson Llewellyn ◽  
Frank H. Keezer
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-479
Author(s):  
Sridevi Thambapillay

The Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (LRA) which was passed in 1976 and came into force on 1st March 1982, standardized the laws concerning non-Muslim family matters. Many family issues concerning non-Muslim have emerged ever since, the most important being the effects of unilateral conversion to Islam by one of the parties to the marriage. There has been a lot of public hue and cry for amendments to be made to the LRA. After much deliberation, the Malaysian Parliament finally passed the amendments to the LRA in October 2017, which came into force in December 2018. Although the amendments have addressed selected family law issues, the most important amendment on child custody in a unilateral conversion to Islam was dropped from the Bill at the last minute. Howsoever, at the end of the day, the real question that needs to be addressed is whether the amendments have resolved the major issues that have arisen over the past four decades? Hence, the purpose of this article is as follows: first, to examine the brief background to the passing of the LRA, secondly, to analyse the 2017 amendments, thirdly, to identify the weaknesses that still exist in the LRA, and finally, to suggest recommendations to overcome these weaknesses by comparing the Malaysian position with the Singaporean position. In conclusion, it is submitted that despite the recent amendments to the LRA, much needs to be done to overcome all the remaining issues that have still not been addressed.


Author(s):  
V.C. Govindaraj

This chapter deals with the law relating to marriage and divorce, as interpreted and applied by courts in India. Marriage involves many topics/processes such as celebration, divorce, nullity, etc., and each one is accorded a different treatment by the concerned law. The following topics/processes under each matrimonial law are discussed: pre-solemnization requisites; solemnization; divorce; marriages solemnized under the Foreign Marriages Act, 1969; the conversion of spouses of the Hindu, Christian, and Parsi marriages to Islam, and right to polygamy after such conversion; conversion of Muslim women from Islam after dissolution of marriage under Muslim Law; and rights of a Muslim woman to seek divorce and maintenance.


2019 ◽  
pp. 173-212
Author(s):  
Lawrence M. Friedman

This chapter discusses the law on marriage and divorce, family property, adoption, poor laws and social welfare, and slavery and African Americans in the United States. In the colonial period, the United States had no courts to handle matters of marriage and divorce. Marriage was a contract—an agreement between a man and a woman. Under the rules of the common law, the country belonged to the whites; and more specifically, it belonged to white men. Women had civil rights but no political rights. There were no formal provisions for adoption. A Massachusetts law, passed in 1851, was one of the earliest, and most significant, general adoption law. The so-called poor laws were the basic welfare laws.


1972 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Read

When the Commission on the Law of Marriage and Divorce in Kenya presented its Report in 1968, the basic scheme of its proposals, and the draft Bill it had prepared for the reform and integration of the laws, were widely welcomed and it has been a disappointment to many—not least, it may be supposed, to the members of the Commission—that four years have passed without those proposals having been translated into statutory form in Kenya. It is a little ironic, though no doubt an interesting example of East African inter-dependence, that the essential basis of those proposals, and indeed in many respects the detailed draft provisions which accompanied them, have now been given their first legislative effect not in Kenya but in Tanzania.


1983 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Coldham

The 1982 Report on the Law of Succession (the Report) was the first report to be published by the Law Development Commission (the Commission) sinceit was established in 1974. This almost certainly indicates the importance which the government of Zambia attaches to the reform of the law of succession, and perhaps marks a change of attitude on its part towards customary law, which could also have implications for the law of marriage and divorce. Statements by government ministers indicate that legislation along the lines proposed by the Commission is likely in the near future. It seems appropriate, therefore, to appraise these proposals and to compare them with reforms carried out elsewhere in Commonwealth Africa.


2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Abdul Hak

This article seeks to discuss in general the practice of family mediation in some selected Asian countries. For this purpose the practice in Singapore, China, Japan and Hong Kong is described. However the focus of the article is the law and practice of conciliation in Malaysia which are governed by the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act, 1976. Some issues pertaining to the position of the non-Muslims in Malaysia are also highlighted.


ICR Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-274
Author(s):  
Mohamed Azam Mohamed Adil

Child custody refers to the upbringing of a child, including the parental responsibility to provide protection, love, care, education, shelter and management. Generally, in determining who will be the legal custodian of a child, a court will first and foremost ensure that the child’s welfare is well-protected.  In Malaysia, child custody is governed by two separate laws, one for non- Muslims and one for Muslims. For non-Muslims, the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act of 1976 (Act 164) holds sway, while for Muslims it is either the Islamic Family Law Enactments of the respective states or the Islamic Family Law Act of the Federal Territories that are relevant. While the Malaysian civil court operates over the non-Muslim laws, the Syariah court operates over the Muslim ones.  


1999 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 743-755
Author(s):  
Reuven Yaron

Our colleague, Professor Ze'ev Falk died on the eve of Rosh Hashana 5759, at the age of 75. His scholarly interests ranged widely; he was expert, inter alia, on the law of the interim period, between Bible and Talmud. Concerning later periods, his attention was given primarily to the law of marriage and divorce. He was a deeply religious man, yet free from any trace of complacency. When, as happens, he was unhappy with the way halakha went, he was wont to speak out and search for solutions. That the custodians of halakha would not tend to heed his suggestions, need not surprise. As a rule, they are reluctant to take notice of question-marks and solutions originating from without; and in their strict sense Falk was an outsider. But this was their problem rather than his.This short paper is presented here in eius memoriam, as a token of friendship and respect. It would have been within the sphere of his interest.May he rest in peace.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document