Barn Swallows

2021 ◽  
pp. 76-76
Keyword(s):  
1997 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 1176-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horacio de la Cueva ◽  
Robert W. Blake

Aerodynamic power equations predict optimal speeds at which birds ought to fly if they are to maximize time spent in the air on a given energy store (minimum power speed, Vmp), distance covered using a given amount of fuel (maximum range speed, Vmr), and rate of delivering food to the chicks in the nest (Vnest), or maximize the daily energy balance (VDBAL). With the aerodynamic model employed, these speeds are 5.3, 7.0, 7.9, and 8.9 m∙s−1, respectively, for the Barn Swallow, Hirundo rustica. A comparison of the predicted flight speed with both the mean and median flight speeds (8 m∙s−1 in both cases; n = 821) recorded with Doppler radar indicates that Barn Swallows fly at speeds not significantly different from Vnest. The true sample size was unknown, and realistic sample sizes are drawn with bootstrap procedures and compared with those given by the number of measurements (821); no significant differences were found. To test the model, energy requirements for growth, prey density, and time spent foraging were varied independently in a sensitivity analysis. Large but realistic changes in these three variables do not contradict the model and predict speeds within the range measured in the field.


2002 ◽  
Vol 205 (16) ◽  
pp. 2461-2467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Liechti ◽  
Lukas Bruderer

SUMMARYThe flight paths and wingbeat patterns of 39 barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) and 26 house martins (Delichon urbica) were recorded by tracking radar during the spring migration. Depending mostly on flight angle,hirundines performed anything from continuous flapping flight during climbing to single pulse-like wing beats during descent. Unlike most other passerines,hirundines rarely showed regular flapping and rest phases, allowing them to be distinguished from other bird migrants by radar echo signatures. Effective wingbeat frequency (Feff) was calculated as the mean number of wing beats per second, including non-flapping phases. Under comparable flight conditions, Feff was higher in house martins than in barn swallows. Within species, Feff values were higher during climbing and slow flying than during descent. Of the variance in Feff, 71 % could be explained by climb rate,air speed and species; similar results were obtained in the wind tunnel. Under comparable flight conditions, barn swallows and house martins in free flight had significantly lower values of Feff than individuals in wind tunnel experiments (by 40 % and 32 %, respectively). This difference may at least partly be due to the shorter wings of the juveniles tested in the wind tunnel during autumn. However, it seems unlikely that this can account for all of the large difference. It is suggested that wind tunnel experiments might overestimate birds' flight costs compared with free flight.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0129340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith A. Hobson ◽  
Kevin J. Kardynal ◽  
Steven L. Van Wilgenburg ◽  
Gretchen Albrecht ◽  
Antonio Salvadori ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 889-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. McGraw ◽  
Rebecca J. Safran ◽  
Matthew R. Evans ◽  
Kazumasa Wakamatsu
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document