Civilization, Hierarchy, And Political-economic Inequality

2018 ◽  
pp. 77-96
Author(s):  
Stephan Feuchtwang
2021 ◽  
pp. 089692052110494
Author(s):  
Robert J. Antonio

This paper addresses Trump’s failed self-coup, its authoritarian backwash, and threats to democracy. It analyzes his handling of the coronavirus pandemic, which contributed to his 2020 election loss and deepened the political polarization that led to the January 6 Capitol insurrection. The essay also discusses how the forty-year acceleration of economic inequality and sociopolitical de-democratization generated a legitimacy crisis of the hegemonic, neoliberal regime that opened way for Trumpist ethnoracial nationalism. The Trump presidency and pandemic increased the intensity of the political-economic contradictions and transparency of the attenuated relationship of democracy and capitalism. In the consequent “interregnum,” fundamental threats to democratic electoral institutions persist, yet a clear, realistic vision of an alternative democratic regime and the political bloc to bring it into being have yet to be forged. The fate of American democracy rides on overcoming the remarkable denial and normalization of the Trump coup attempt and on forging new safeguards for electoral institutions. Preventing a recurrence, however, requires a progressive transformation of Trumpism’s de-democratized seedbed – neoliberal capitalism.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (Extra-D) ◽  
pp. 111-116
Author(s):  
Anna I. Yakovleva ◽  
Ekaterina V. Kartashevich ◽  
Dmitry N. Levashеv ◽  
Margarita V. Finko ◽  
Vladimir I. Mareev

This work considers the specifics of social and economic inequality in Russian society. The institutional, resource and transformational approaches outline the methodological framework of this study and allow for a comprehensive analysis of political, economic and cultural institutions of Russian society, which functioning contributed to excessive social and economic inequality in the country. It is revealed that the authoritarian model of state management, the social structure of rent-class type and the lack of formation of civil society institutions are the main factors of reproduction of excessive social and economic inequality in Russian society. The results obtained in the course of the study can be applied in activities of federal and regional structures dealing with issues of economic and social policy of the state, as well as in activities of legislative authorities at the federal and regional levels.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Brittain

The ‘intellectual’ justification of economic inequality as framed through the work of Harry G. Frankfurt is the basis of the following review essay. The target adopts a belief in the practice where the more one repeats a simplistic argument so, too, will such ideas hold the potential weight to be uncritically received. In a demeanour that only one from the insulated armchair of affluence and security provided by the academy can, Frankfurt, less than subtlety, reiterates a claim that an authentic morality would suggest inequality is the most proficient stasis for a given sociality. Challenging such a position, the trajectory of this assessment invokes both Marx’s early conceptualization of estrangement and a Gramscian critique toward the dumbing-down of critical thought alongside academia’s subservient role to political-economic power. Misinformed of the causality of socioeconomic disparity (and impediments to human potential), a review of Marxian thought can shed light on how economic inequality is not centred on a deficiency in subjective perception but rather a structural equation of material relations that have long enabled such a reality to withstand. It is through an insolent exposure of elitist proposition and ill-informed misdirection that those who would distort philosophical thought can be shown for what they are; (unconscious or not) ‘traditional intellectuals’ validating the endurance of capitalist enclosure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document