Status update for the IEC series of laser safety standards

Author(s):  
Robert Weiner
1980 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-156
Author(s):  
Harry Zwick ◽  
Bruce E. Stuck ◽  
Edwin S. Beatrice

Although present laser safety standards are based on an adequate data base for acute viewing situations, they are limited in predicting the type of change in visual function that might be induced from prolonged or repetitive viewing of laser sources. Viewing requirements in holography, laser display systems, and, in general, repeated exposure to low levels of laser radiation require a more complete data base for optimizing the environmental protection of individuals who will be required to work in such environments. In these studies, we have simulated very low-level radiation environments and determined the effects of repetitive prolonged exposure on the visual function of the Rhesus. Our data suggest that prolonged viewing of such sources, even though they are well below present laser safety standards, can produce permanent changes in visual processes that underlie normal human day (photopic) and night (scotopic) vision, although preliminary studies of morphology have shown no morphological correlate. The coherency of laser light is implicated as a significant factor in inducing these effects. It is recommended that individuals required to work in these situations be frequently evaluated for changes in visual function by presently available clinical instruments for assessment of visual function. Further confirmation of these studies will determine the impact of these research findings on present laser safety standards.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5-6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Gappenach ◽  
Jörg Krüger ◽  
Friedrich Offenhäuser ◽  
Sabine Pintaske ◽  
Hans-Joachim Krauß

AbstractThe European laser safety standards EN 207, EN 208, and EN 12254 each contain an annex B, which serves as a guidance for the selection of products. These annexes are informative only and are therefore not binding. As there are a variety of hazard scenarios, it is not recommended to change these annexes to a normative status, through which they would become mandatory. Instead, it is recommended to allow users to apply their own skills and know-how in selecting appropriate products, justifying where and why they deviate from the guidance in the standards. This paper explains the background on which the guidance for selection in the annexes of the standards is based and shows physically meaningful leeway.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaroslaw Mlynczak

Abstract The article describes the laser safety classification of a laser toy for children equipped with a laser aimer/illuminator with two radiation sources. Following the rules presented in EN 60825-1: 2014 standard, the tests and measurements of the accessible emission were carried out and the class of the laser product was determined to be 3R. It was shown that the laser toy does not comply with the requirements of the EN 62115: 2020 standard and the Public Health England Guidance. The potential hazards associated with Class 3R, indicated in the EN 60825-1: 2014 standard, are also discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 485-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adarsh Ravishankar ◽  
Yelizaveta Turetsky ◽  
Shelley Novotny ◽  
Taryn Allen ◽  
Ronda S. Farah

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document