Non-invasive biomarkers for gastric cancer diagnosis: ready for prime time?

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide G. Ribaldone ◽  
Daniele Simondi ◽  
Elisa Petrini ◽  
Marco Astegiano ◽  
Marilena Durazzo
2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Cuellar-Gomez ◽  
Ma Esther Ocharán-Hernández ◽  
Claudia C. Calzada-Mendoza ◽  
David A. Comoto-Santacruz

2015 ◽  
pp. 5-14
Author(s):  
Van Huy Tran ◽  
Quang Trung Tran

The prognosis of gastric cancer depends principally upon an early diagnosis. An early and accurate diagnosis of gastric cancer needs some basic knowledges about the endoscopic characteristics of white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, magnified endoscopy, FICE and NBI…A strategy of screening is also a key factor for early diagnosis. The treatment of early gastric cancer by endoscopy techniques have showed more and more advantages. Beside of EMR, the technique of ESD is now applied more widely and lead to a very good prognosis and nearly a curative treatment for the patients with early gastric cancer. Key words: gastric cancer, early gastric cancer, diagnosis, endoscopy


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
meng yang zhou ◽  
chao li ◽  
bao long wang ◽  
Lin Huang

Exosomes as fluid biomarkers hold great promise for non-invasive cancer diagnosis. However, a method with rapid and convenient for exosome detection is still challenging duo to the current analysis process...


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donglang Jiang ◽  
Xing Chen ◽  
Zhiwen You ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Xiaoyun Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Early and precise diagnosis and staging of gastric cancer are important for its treatment and management. However, the low sensitivity of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) for gastric cancer diagnosis limits its application. Currently, the tracer 68Ga-FAPI, which targets fibroblast activation protein (FAP), is widely used to diagnose various cancers. However, the diagnostic value of 68Ga-FAPI in gastric cancer is still unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential advantage of 68Ga-FAPI-04 over 18F-FDG in the evaluation of gastric cancer.Methods: Thirty-eight patients with gastric cancer (31 with adenocarcinoma and 7 with signet ring cell carcinoma) were recruited for this study. All of the participants underwent 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG imaging by positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) or PET/magnetic resonance (MR). The results were interpreted by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was calculated.Results: For the detection of primary gastric cancer, the sensitivities of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET and 18F-FDG PET were 100% (38/38) and 81.6% (31/38), respectively. Four cases of adenocarcinoma and three cases of signet ring cell carcinoma were missed by 18F-FDG PET. The SUVmax of 68Ga-FAPI-04 in tumors greater than 4 cm (11.0 ± 4.5) was higher than tumors less than 4 cm (4.5 ± 3.2) (P = 0.0015). The SUVmax of 68Ga-FAPI-04 was higher in T2-4 tumors (9.7 ± 4.4) than in T1 tumors (3.1 ± 1.5) (P = 0.0002). For the detection of metastatic lesions, the sensitivities of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET and 18F-FDG PET in 10 patients with regional lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were 6/10 and 5/10, respectively.Conclusion: Compared to 18F-FDG PET, 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET had superior potential in detecting primary gastric cancers and metastatic lymph nodes, 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET also had a better performance on small gastric cancer detection. 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET could provide better performance for gastric cancer diagnosis and staging.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Ge ◽  
Xiaolei Zhang ◽  
Yanling Ma ◽  
Shaohua Chen ◽  
Zhaowu Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Early diagnosis is very important to improve the survival rate of patients with gastric cancer, especially in asymptomatic participants. However, low sensitivity of common biomarkers has caused difficulties in early screening of gastric cancer. In this study, we explored whether MIC-1 can improve the detection rate of early gastric cancer.METHODS We screened 8,257 participants based on risk factors such as age, gender, and family history for physical examination including gastroscopy. Participant blood samples were taken for measure MIC-1, CA-199, CA72-4 and PG1/PG2 levels. The diagnostic performance of MIC-1 was assessed and compared with CA-199, CA72-4 and PG1/PG2, and its role in early gastric cancer diagnosis and the assessment of the risk of precancerous lesions have also been studied.RESULTS Based on endoscopic and histopathological findings, 55 participants had gastric cancer, 566 participants had low-grade neoplasia, 2605 participants had chronic gastritis. MIC-1 levels were significantly elevated in gastric cancer serum samples as compared to controls (p<0.001). The sensitivity of serum MIC-1 for gastric cancer diagnosis was much higher than that of CA-199 (49.1% vs. 20.0%) with similar specificities. Moreover, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis also showed that serum MIC-1 had a better performance compared with CA-199, CA72-4 and PG1/PG2 in distinguishing early-stage gastric cancer (AUC: 72.9% vs. 69.5%, 67.5%, 44.0% respectively).CONCLUSIONS Serum MIC-1 is significantly elevated in most patients with early gastric cancer. MIC-1 can serve as a novel diagnostic marker of early gastric cancer and value the risk of gastric cancer.


2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yee Leng Yap ◽  
Xue Wu Zhang ◽  
David Smith ◽  
Richie Soong ◽  
Jeffrey Hill

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document