Introduction

Author(s):  
Alan L. Mittleman

This book is a philosophical inquiry into the relationships among holiness, ethics, and violence. Drawing on the resources of Jewish philosophy, it examines what holiness is, how it is connected to morality, and how it is implicated in that breakdown of morality otherwise known as violence. The discussion aims to facilitate an analysis of religious violence in Judaism and present a concept of holiness in Judaism that is true to its biblical roots—that is not simply reducible to moral categories but that is nonetheless linked to morality. Working in the idioms of philosophical theology and ethics, this book also considers God's character and conduct. The question about holiness and violence, it asserts, is a question about how we ought to conceive of God. Finally, the book looks at the entanglement of holiness with goodness and advances an original theory of holiness, what it calls a “natural history of holiness”.

Author(s):  
John Teehan

Morality from an evolutionary perspective is a code of conduct that regulates behavior within a group in order to promote social cohesion and stability. Both religion and secularism are grounded in the same moral psychology. How should the distinction between secular and religious ethics be assessed? Religious morality is a late-comer to the natural history of morality, reinforcing much of morality with a worldview about unnatural powers that humans’ brains are prone to projecting onto reality. However, the natural history of morality reveals that religious moral traditions do not originate moral rules but instead reinforce ancient moral intuitions. Secularism as a worldview works within an immanent frame, compared to the transcendent frame of religious worldviews. This distinction is helpful in understanding the relationship between religious violence and secular-ideological driven violence.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannes Rakoczy

Abstract The natural history of our moral stance told here in this commentary reveals the close nexus of morality and basic social-cognitive capacities. Big mysteries about morality thus transform into smaller and more manageable ones. Here, I raise questions regarding the conceptual, ontogenetic, and evolutionary relations of the moral stance to the intentional and group stances and to shared intentionality.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A128-A128 ◽  
Author(s):  
H MALATY ◽  
D GRAHAM ◽  
A ELKASABANY ◽  
S REDDY ◽  
S SRINIVASAN ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A366-A366
Author(s):  
C MAZZEO ◽  
F AZZAROLI ◽  
A COLECCHIA ◽  
S DISILVIO ◽  
A DORMI ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 77-78
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Porter ◽  
Jochen Walz ◽  
Andrea Gallina ◽  
Claudio Jeldres ◽  
Koichi Kodama ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 397-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wassim Kassouf ◽  
Philippe E. Spiess ◽  
Gordon A. Brown ◽  
Mark F. Munsell ◽  
H. Barton Grossman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document