scholarly journals New Findings on the Fiscal Impact of Immigration in the United States

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (1704) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia M. Orrenius ◽  

1947 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 673
Author(s):  
Martin P. Claussen ◽  
James A. Maxwell


1990 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Elster

This paper is a plea for the study of ‘local justice’, i.e. the allocation by institutions of scarce goods and necessary burdens. It is largely programmatic, with few new findings to report. Later, case studies which are currently being carried out in West Germany, France, Norway and the United States will provide answers to some of the questions raised below.



1947 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 426
Author(s):  
James W. Martin ◽  
James A. Maxwell


Author(s):  
Anmol Wadhwa ◽  
Sushama Talegaonkar ◽  
Harvinder Popli

Objective: Medical device acceptance of patients has grown considerably in recent years. This has question the effectiveness of the current regulatory frameworks to ensure the performance, safety, and quality of new devices. This article focuses on the methodical overview on hip and knee joint replacement medical devices evaluating the procedure and proper analysis of medical device regulation in three jurisdictions i.e. the United States of America (USA), EUROPE and INDIA, exploring reforms been laid to stabilize and meet the requirements of existing systems, and further analyse the additional actions which should be employed to fully meet this ultimate goal. Method: We analysed the hip and knee joint replacement medical device regulation system through a secondary research in United States, Europe and India in compliance with the updated national regulatory authority’s legislative documents and requirements. Result: These three regulatory systems vary in their working, organization, acceptance for their specific pre- and post-market evidence requirements, and transparency of process. The most challenging factor remains the same for the countries which are to make sure safety and effectiveness of devices, proper monitoring of its use and important compliance information readiness employing quality management system towards new findings and acceptance for the users. A case study of Johnson & Johnson ASR Implant was also studied, highlighting the major reforms required and the reforms introduced in the United States, Europe and India. Thus, quality and safety reforms are made to strengthen the premarket compliance requirements, enhancing the need of post-market regulation through proper traceability and monitoring of devices by employing the functioning medical device registry. Conclusion: Recent reforms address the major challenges in device regulation, highlighting the need to create connecting points between the device identifier system and existing data collection tools, such as electronic health records, and maintaining effective and up to date use of registries to ensure post-market use of new and existing devices.



1946 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 252
Author(s):  
Alfred G. Buehler ◽  
James A. Maxwell


2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-44
Author(s):  
BERNARD M. HOEKMAN ◽  
PETROS C. MAVROIDIS

AbstractThis paper discusses the 2005 dispute between the European Community (EC) and the United States (US) regarding the customs classification of two specific products and the ambit of Art. X GATT (Publication and Administration of Trade Regulations). The Dispute Settlement Panel and the Appellate Body (AB) essentially upheld the position advocated by the EC, with one exception that is of no practical import, as the EC had already modified its regime. While the AB followed prior case law, it added two new findings. First, the WTO-consistency of laws can be challenged under Art. X GATT if they concern the implementation or application of laws concerning customs administration and enforcement. Second, the obligation included in Art. X.3(b) GATT to establish tribunals or procedures to review and correct administrative actions relating to customs matters concerns courts of first instance only. Thus it is quite possible that their decisions might not be uniform, and absence of uniformity at this level is not a violation of Art. X.3(b).



2005 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Freddy A. Paniagua

This paper argues that, when analyzing and reporting new findings of disparities in health, two areas from the recent U.S. Census of 2000 should be considered for those findings to be meaningful. The first is to avoid analyzing and reporting findings of disparity with an emphasis on the term “Hispanic” and instead to specify the particular Hispanic group from which such findings were collected, such as Mexican-American versus Cuban communities. The second point is that such findings should also take into consideration combination of two or more races. For example, reporting would allow for multiple groupings for respondents who consider themselves African American and White, or African American, Asian, and White.



1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Mangano

From the early 1980s to the early 1990s, the incidence of cancer in American children under 10 years of age rose 37 percent, or 3 percent annually. There is an inverse correlation between increases in cancer rates and age at diagnosis; the largest rise (54 percent) occurred in children diagnosed before their first birthday. Rates rose for all 11 states and cities included in the analysis. A jump in cancer rates for children born in 1982–83 was followed by a drop; but another abrupt rise for the 1986–87 birth cohort has been sustained thereafter. Results indicate that the rising childhood cancer rate represents a far more serious problem in the United States than previous reports have suggested. The methodology used here adds three additional states and cities, analyzes children under 10 rather than under 15, begins the analysis in 1980 rather than in 1973, and extends the study to 1993, which may partially account for the new findings. There are no apparent explanations for these trends, suggesting that researchers should analyze the data more fully and propose hypotheses on potential causes. One possible factor, fetal and infant exposure to low-dose radioactivity, is explored here.



1949 ◽  
Vol 59 (235) ◽  
pp. 432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry G. Johnson ◽  
James A. Maxwell


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document