scholarly journals Anesthesia Management in Cesarean Section for Close Contact Parturient with COVID-19 Patient: A Case Report

Author(s):  
Yeon Ji Roh ◽  
Ki Young Shin ◽  
Jangho Bae ◽  
Seongsik Kang

During the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak, which produced a disease that had been termed COVID-19, safely treating patients that have contracted COVID-19 has become a very challenging problem for both patients and healthcare workers alike. The case we will be dealing with concerns a surgery of a full-term parturient who tested negative for COVID-19 at the time of surgery but had been living with a husband who contracted COVID-19. The parturient was taken up for an elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia in an isolated operating room. It is necessary to consider how to manage the patient who was a close contact even if their COVID-19 test result is negative and how to set up the protocols to protect healthcare workers themselves in such situation. Keywords ---- (COVID-19, Caesarean section, Parturient, Spinal anesthesia)

Author(s):  
Devindra Kaur ◽  
Harminder Singh

<p class="abstract"><span lang="EN-US">Birth fractures are common during vaginal deliveries and with breech presentations. This case report of fracture humerus during elective LSCS done for previous LSCS with vertex presentation and with no predisposing risk factors.</span></p>


Author(s):  
Angelo Baggiani ◽  
Silvia Briani ◽  
Grazia Luchini ◽  
Mauro Giraldi ◽  
Carlo Milli ◽  
...  

In Italy, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency took hold in Lombardy and Veneto at the end of February 2020 and spread unevenly among the other regions in the following weeks. In Tuscany, the progressive increase of hospitalized COVID-19 patients required the set-up of a regional task force to prepare for and effectively respond to the emergency. In this case report, we aim to describe the key elements that have been identified and implemented in our center, a 1082-bed hospital located in the Pisa district, to rapidly respond to the COVID-19 outbreak in order to guarantee safety of patients and healthcare workers.


2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (181) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Subedi ◽  
M Tripathi ◽  
BK Bhattarai ◽  
PK Gupta ◽  
K Pokharel ◽  
...  

Introduction: The study compared spinal anesthesia using intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine between height and weight adjusted dose and fi xed dose during caesarean section. Methods: A hundred parturients, who had given their consent and were scheduled for elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia, were randomly assigned into two groups. We adjusted the intrathecal dose of heavy bupivacaine (0.5 %) according to the height and weight of patients (Group AD) from Harten’s dose chart developed from the Caucasian parturients and the fi xed dose (2.2 ml) was used in Group FD patients. Keeping the observer blinded to the study groups, the onset time to sensory block up to T5, haemodynamic changes, side effects, and fetal outcome were observed. Results: The median onset time of spinal block in Group FD was faster than in Group AD (6 min vs. 4 min; p = 0.01). The spinal block level extended above T3 level in a signifi cantly (p < 0.05) larger number of patients 12 (24 %) in Group FD than in one (2 %) patient in Group AD. A signifi cantly (p < 0.05) larger number of patients, 32, (64 %) in Group FD had hypotension than in 15 (30 %) patients in Group AD. The lowest recorded SAP (101 ± 6 mm Hg) in Group AD was higher than in Group FD (96 ± 6.7 mm Hg). Nausea and vomiting were more pronounced in Group FD patients. Conclusions: The bupivacaine dose was signifi cantly reduced on its dose adjustment for the body weight and height of patients for cesearean section. This adjusted-dose use suitably restricted spinal block level for cesarean section with a distinct advantage of less hypotension and with a similar neonatal outcome as fi xed compared with the dose use. keywords: caesarean section; low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine; spinal anesthesia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4 (Part 2)) ◽  
pp. 1384-1386
Author(s):  
Naveed Abrar ◽  
◽  
Ahmedi Fathima ◽  
Waseem Anjum ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
K. Tunau ◽  
S. Bello ◽  
A. Panti ◽  
S. Alabi

Bilateral tubal ligation is a form of female sterilization. It is the most commonly used method of family planning worldwide and it is a permanent method of fertility control. However the failure rate is 0.1 – 0.8%. A case report of a booked Gravida 5, Para 3+1, Alive 3 who had two previous Caesarean Sections and a previous Uterine Rupture is presented. She had a Bilateral Tubal Ligation (BTL) performed. She however presented six years after this with a spontaneous pregnancy. She presented in the first trimester, the pregnancy was followed up and she eventually had elective caesarean section and repeat bilateral tubal ligation.


Author(s):  
Pradeep Kumari ◽  
Sifna Tahir ◽  
Haveena Kumari ◽  
Altaf Ahmad Mir

Background: During caesarean section hypotension due to spinal block is secondary to the sympathetic blockade and aorto-caval compression by the uterus. It can have important consequences for the mother and may affect neonatal outcome. The present study was aimed to compare intravenous bolus doses of phenylephrine and ephedrine to treat maternal hypotension during spinal block for elective caesarean section.Methods: After fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 100 parturient were randomly allocated into two groups of fifty each. For spinal anesthesia lumber puncture was done and 12.5mg, 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine was given intra-thecally. In this observational study, patients who developed hypotension under spinal anesthesia were selected for the study. According to their group, patients received either ephedrine 6mg (Group E) or phenylephrine 75µg (Group P) as vasopressor. During the study, number of vasopressor boluses, hemodynamic response and time taken to recover from hypotension was noted.Results: Ephedrine and phenylephrine were used in the mean doses of 6.72±1.97mg and 91.5±31.38µg respectively. In 88% parturient single bolus dose of ephedrine was effective in treating hypotension while phenylephrine was effective in 78% parturient. There was no significant difference observed in total number of boluses used. No significant difference was seen in mean systolic blood pressure, mean diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure over a given period of time in Group E and Group P. Mean systolic BP was less than 20% when compared to baseline in both the groups at different time intervals. In Group P the mean heart rate was significantly lower as compared to the Group E (p<0.05).Conclusions: Intravenous phenylephrine and ephedrine are both similar in performance in treating hypotension after spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section and the hypotensive control offered is comparable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document