tubal ligation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

689
(FIVE YEARS 100)

H-INDEX

33
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Jaishree Bamniya ◽  
Devanshi Patel ◽  
Pooja Singh ◽  
Nisha Chakravarti

Background: India is projected to be the most populous country according to United Nations’ report; therefore, the knowledge and awareness of contraceptive methods is of utmost important for small family norms and to increase inter-pregnancy interval, so that we can achieve optimum maternal and child outcomes. This study was conducted to assess knowledge, awareness, and acceptance of contraceptive methods among reproductive-age women during Corona pandemic.Methods: A prospective observational questionnaire-based study involving 513 women belonging to the 15-49 years of age group were interviewed with consent. This was a knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) study regarding socio-demographic profile, knowledge, awareness, and acceptance of the contraceptive method.Results: Statistical analysis of data was done by using chi-square and percentage. Out of 513 participants, 63 participants were not using any method of contraception. Barrier method is the most commonly preferred method of contraception. There was significant association of education of women and husband, occupation with usage of contraception (p<0.001, p=0.016 and p<0.001). During corona pandemic acceptance of tubal ligation had taken a hit.Conclusions: During corona pandemic barrier method and oral contraceptive pills were preferred methods. In comparison with pre-COVID era data, tubal ligation was least preferred method. Acceptance of IUCD and Injectable contraception remained same. Higher education level and better financial status had correlation with increased awareness and acceptance of contraceptive methods.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Vernon Wheeler ◽  
Kayla Carman
Keyword(s):  

Menopause ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine R. Langton ◽  
Brian W. Whitcomb ◽  
Alexandra C. Purdue-Smithe ◽  
Lynnette L. Sievert ◽  
Susan E. Hankinson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
John J. Byrne ◽  
Emma M. Smith ◽  
Alexander M. Saucedo ◽  
Kaitlin A. Doody ◽  
Denisse Holcomb ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Taru Gupta ◽  
Divya Baruhee ◽  
Sunaina Agarwal

Background: Recent theory on ovarian malignancy suggests its origin from primary foci in fallopian tubes. Prophylactic salpingectomy may benefit in risk reduction of ovarian cancer. The aim of the study was to compare the feasibility of complete salpingectomy with bilateral tubal ligation was made during caesarean delivery in women desirous of permanent sterilisation.Methods: We conducted a prospective interventional randomized control study in department of obstetrics and gynaecology, ESI-PGIMSR Basaidarapur, New Delhi from October 2018 to February 2021. 70 women participated in this study desiring permanent sterilisation during caesarean delivery. Patients were randomized into two groups who either underwent bilateral tubal ligation [group A (N=35)] or complete bilateral salpingectomy [group B (N=35)].Results: Procedure was completed in 91% patients in group A and 77% in group B (p >0.05) making both the procedures feasible.  Total operative time (min) in group A and B were 47 and 55 respectively (p<0.01). Mean sterilisation procedure time (min) in group A was 5 and group B was 6 (p=0.13). No significant difference was seen in intra-operative blood loss (400 ml in group A vs 300 ml in group B), percentage decrease in post-op haemoglobin (g/dl) (4.56±2.96 in group A vs 3.91±2.7 in group B), post-operative serum Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels (ng/ml) (group A-0.965±0.12 vs 0.7±0.09 in group B) in the two groups.Conclusions: Salpingectomy as an alternative to tubal ligation should be discussed with suitable patients desirous of permanent sterilisation during caesarean delivery. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (11) ◽  
pp. 675-679
Author(s):  
June Ng ◽  
Diana Ho ◽  
Jharna M. Patel ◽  
Cybill Esguerra ◽  
Meike Schuster ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aileen M. Gariepy ◽  
Daniel J. Tancredi ◽  
Carrie Lewis ◽  
Diana Zuckerman ◽  
Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Keyword(s):  

Healthline ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
Viraj Panchal ◽  
Vaibhavi Patel ◽  
Aastha Nayak ◽  
Jay Parikh ◽  
Bansari Parikh

Introduction: Unplanned pregnancy may be the reason of many neonatal and maternal adverse effects. Many factors have been reported to be associated with acceptance of female sterilization. Objective: To identify various socio-demographic factors affecting the decision of choice of Tubal Ligation (TL). Method: A record based study was done using data from the register maintained at the Family Planning Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology department. Analysis of data of TL operations conducted between April 2018 to March 2019 were performed. Results: A total of 675 tubal ligation operations were conducted. The mean age of females undergoing TL was 28.8 ± 3.9 years and their husbands was 33.25 ± 4.38 years. Out of the total, 484(71.1%) couples were Muslims. Total 74(10.8%) females were illiterate and 39(5.8%) males were illiterate. Among 440 (65.1%) couples who had underwent TL had 3 living children. Majority i.e. 518 (76.7%) had the age of their last living child less than 1 month. Ninety one percent of couples had at least one male child. There was a significant relationship of female education with total number of living children. Relationship of total number of living children with religion was also significant statistically. Conclusion: The study concludes that female education as well as religious and cultural beliefs plays a major role in deciding the female sterilization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document