scholarly journals Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: How Do You Perform? Left and Right Atrial Linear Ablation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-114
Author(s):  
Michele Brunelli ◽  
Mark Adrian Sammut
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Low Voltage ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Pulmonary Veins ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Linear Ablation

Catheter ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation is not yet clearly defined with respect to endpoints, and different ablative strategies are offered to patients. Presented here is an approach aiming at biatrial debulking in the form of extensive linear ablation, specifically targeting areas of low-voltage complex fractionated electrograms, in addition to pulmonary vein isolation. Its main advantage is that it is not dependent on operator/system variability, since the strategy of isolating the pulmonary veins, superior vena cava and left atrial posterior wall together with achievement of bidirectional block during linear ablation provides objective endpoints that can consistently be reproduced.

Pulmonary vein isolation alone vs. more extensive ablation with defragmentation and linear ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: the EARNEST-PVI trial

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Inoue ◽  
Shungo Hikoso ◽  
Masaharu Masuda ◽  
Yoshio Furukawa ◽  
Akio Hirata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Inferior Margin ◽  
Linear Ablation

Abstract Aims Previous studies could not demonstrate any benefit of more intensive ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) including complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) and linear ablation for recurrence in the initial catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to establish the non-inferiority of PVI alone to PVI plus these additional ablation strategies. Methods and results Patients with persistent AF who underwent an initial catheter ablation (n = 512, long-standing persistent AF; 128 cases) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either PVI alone (PVI-alone group) or PVI plus CFAE and/or linear ablation (PVI-plus group). After excluding 15 cases who did not receive procedures, we analysed 249 and 248 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint was recurrence of AF, atrial flutter, and/or atrial tachycardia, and the non-inferior margin was set at a hazard ratio of 1.43. In the PVI-plus group, 85.1% of patients had linear ablation and 15.3% CFAE ablation. After 12 months, freedom from the primary endpoint occurred in 71.3% of patients in the PVI-alone group and in 78.3% in the PVI-plus group [hazard ratio = 1.56 (95% confidence interval: 1.10–2.24), non-inferior P = 0.3062]. The procedure-related complication rates were 2.0% in the PVI-alone group and 3.6% in the PVI-plus group (P = 0.199). Conclusion This randomized trial did not establish the non-inferiority of PVI alone to PVI plus linear ablation or CFAE ablation in patients with persistent AF, but implied that the PVI plus strategy was promising to improve the clinical efficacy (NCT03514693).

Initial Experience with Robotic Epicardial Off-Pump Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 247-250
Author(s):  
Filip Casselman ◽  
Ihsan Bakir ◽  
Pedro Brugada ◽  
Peter Geelen ◽  
Francis Wellens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Veins ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Transverse Sinus ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Off Pump

Objective To evaluate the feasibility and results of isolated endoscopic pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using robotics. Methods Between November 2004 and December 2005, 13 patients (38.5% female) underwent robotic pulmonary vein isolation at our institution. Mean age was 46.8 ± 8.4 years and mean preoperative duration of atrial fibrillation was 52.7 ±31.5 months. Indication for surgery was symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or recurrence after percutaneous treatment (n = 3). Mean preoperative left atrial dimension was 38.5 ± 6.9 mm. The surgical procedure was performed off-pump as an isolated right chest approach. All procedures were performed using the Flex 10 microwave ablator (Guidant, Indianapolis, IN), which was positioned from the right side through the transverse sinus and around the 4 pulmonary veins. Postoperative drug regimen included sotalol and Coumadin. Mean follow-up was 8.5 ± 3.4 months. Results The procedure was successful in 11 patients. One patient needed conversion to median sternotomy for right pulmonary artery bleeding and a second patient had severe transverse sinus adhesions requiring conversion to a bilateral video-assisted small thoracotomy approach. No other morbidity occurred. Mean procedure time in successful cases was 2.7 ± 0.8 hours (range 1.7 to 4 hours). Permanent sinus rhythm was successfully restored in 10 of 13 patients (76.9% beyond 6 months). Nonsuccessful patients had markedly reduced symptoms and frequency of events. One patient required a left and another a right atrial flutter ablation during follow-up. Conclusions Robotic pulmonary vein isolation is a feasible procedure that has the potential to become a valid option in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Ectopies from the superior vena cava after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1562-1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sousuke Sugimura ◽  
Takashi Kurita ◽  
Kazuaki Kaitani ◽  
Ryobun Yasuoka ◽  
Shunichi Miyazaki
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava

scholarly journals Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation without pulmonary vein isolation

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Futyma ◽  
L Zarebski ◽  
A Wrzos ◽  
M Futyma ◽  
P Kulakowski
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ganglionated Plexus

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a cornerstone for catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF), however, long-term efficacy of PVI is frequently below expectations. PVI is invasive, expensive and may be associated with devastating complications. It has been postulated that vagally-mediated AF can be treated by attenuation of parasympathetic drive to the heart using cardioneuroablation by means of radiofrequency CA (RFCA) of the right anterior ganglionated plexus (RAGP), however, data in literature and guidelines are lacking. Purpose To examine the efficacy of RFCA targeting RAGP without PVI in management of vagal AF. Methods We included consecutive 9 male patients with vagal AF who underwent RFCA of RAGP without PVI. RAGP was targeted anatomically from the right atrium (RA) at the postero-septal area below superior vena cava (SVC) and from the left atrium (LA) if needed. The aim was to achieve >30% increase in heart rate (HR) . The follow up consisted of regular visits and Holter ECG conducted every 3 months. Results A total number of 9 patients (age 52 ± 13) with vagally-mediated AF underwent RFCA of RAGP (mean RAGP RF time 147 ± 85, max power 34 ± 8W). The mean procedure time was 60 ± 29min. HR increase >30% was achieved in 8 (89%) patients (pre-RF vs post-RF: 58 ± 8bpm vs 87 ± 12bpm, p = 0.00002) . Transseptal  to reach RAGP also from the LA was needed in 2 (22%) patients. There were no major complications during the procedures. The follow up lasted 6 ± 2 months. Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued in 8 (89%) patients. There was 1 (11%) AF recurrence in the patient in whom targeted HR acceleration during RFCA was not achieved. B-blockers were administered in  6 (67%) patients due to increased HR and such treatment was well tolerated by all. Conclusions Catheter ablation of RAGP without performing PVI is feasible and can be effective in majority of patients with vagally-mediated AF. Increased HR after such cardioneuroablation can be well controlled using b-blockers and is usually associated with mild symptoms. The role of cardioneuroablation for treatment of vagally-mediated AF needs to be determined in prospective trials. Abstract Figure. Cardioneuroablation in vagal AF

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document