scholarly journals Balanced Scorecard Model for Hazards Risk Management at Limpopo River Basin A Country Participatory Approach for MCDA with Scenario Planning

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1268-1285
Author(s):  
Avelino Isaias Mondlane ◽  
Karin Hasson ◽  
Oliver Popov

This paper focuses on the application of both Balanced Scorecard (BSC) conceptual framework and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) a tool for Scenario Planning as a tool for Strategic Decision Thinking, on hazard risk management within Limpopo River Basin. We discuss best practices in four main domains areas, namely Politic (as pool for country raking worldwide), Economic, Social Development and Technology and how they can contribute to build a viable scenario for the management of the basin.  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 610-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.H. Crawford ◽  
K. Crowley ◽  
S.H. Potter ◽  
W.S.A. Saunders ◽  
D.M. Johnston

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Clar ◽  
Lukas Löschner ◽  
Ralf Nordbeck ◽  
Tatjana Fischer ◽  
Thomas Thaler

Abstract This contribution explores the conceptual and empirical linkages between population dynamics and natural hazard risk management (NHRM). Following a review of the international scholarly literature, we conduct a mixed-methods approach in Austria, combining an online survey among policy makers and other stakeholders with a thematic analysis of policy documents. The aim is to investigate the practical relevance of socio-demographic change in Austria’s NHRM. The study shows that many hazard-prone regions in Austria face population change, in particular demographic ageing and population decline. In addition, our findings from the online survey demonstrate the relevance of population dynamics in NHRM, especially with regard to hazard response and recovery. Nonetheless, policy formulation in NHRM overwhelmingly disregards demographic change as a relevant factor. Accordingly, the study underscores the importance of future-oriented risk management strategies to better account for ongoing and expected socio-demographic changes.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara A. Morrongiello ◽  
Brae Anne McArthur ◽  
Melissa Bell

Author(s):  
Saemi Shin ◽  
Sang-Hoon Byeon

In 2012, the Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency developed Chemical Hazard Risk Management (CHARM) as a risk assessment tool. This study aims to reorganize the CHARM technique by complementing its logical loopholes, while evaluating the risk to enterprises and verifying this technique by applying it to some enterprises in Korea. The optimized technique changed the method of quantitative assessment and evaluation criteria, matched the risk level with the required control level, and specified the use of control practice. For the target enterprises, for several assessment methods, risk levels, hazard bands, exposure bands, and the risk assessment results were derived, and the same types of options were compared. Fewer informational methods resulted in more conservative results of risk levels and hazard bands. Since the control status of the enterprises could not be confirmed and the substances handled at the target enterprises were limited in this study, a follow-up study should be performed with more target materials and additional information on the current control status of the enterprises.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document