scholarly journals Guiralt, Carmen: Clarence Brown

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco García Gómez
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
pp. 186-207
Author(s):  
Mary A. Knighton

William Faulkner's novel Intruder in the Dust (1948) thematizes racial debt as a form of racial reparations. Racial debt and its repayment emerge as the white boy Chick Mallison's obsession with defining and ridding himself of a debt he owes Lucas Beauchamp, a black man. When a lynch mob threatens Lucas, it becomes Chick's responsibility to save his life. Guided by Lucas in how to do so, Chick learns about cross-racial family ties and the collective profits and debts of history. Contemporary civil rights and anti-lynching movements, the actual lynching of Ellwood Higginbotham, as well as the shooting of the film version of Intruder in Faulkner's own Oxford, Mississippi in 1949 amplify the novel's debt and reparations theme. Despite publisher and studio warnings, Faulkner and director Clarence Brown render lynching central to Intruder's story while Kauffer's cover art encodes artists' resistance to censorship and marketing demands.


Pólemos ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-51
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Martinico

Abstract This article explores the figure of John Calhoun in two movies, The Gorgeous Hussy (1936), directed by Clarence Brown, and Amistad (1997), directed by Steven Spielberg. In both these movies, John Calhoun’s character had very few but significant scenes that portrayed him as one of those having moral responsibility for the forthcoming Civil War. This representation is in line with the traditional treatment reserved for Calhoun in American history and literature. Building on these cameos in this essay I shall try to reconstruct his thoughts on two matters: States’ rights and slavery.


Author(s):  
Carmen Guiralt Gomar

El largometraje silente norteamericano The Last of the Mohicans (1920), sobre la famosa novela homónima de James Fenimore Cooper, se estrenó como co-dirigido por Maurice Tourneur y Clarence L. Brown. Tourneur era el productor y al inicio el único director, con Brown traba-jando como su ayudante. No obstante, poco después de iniciarse la filmación cayó gravemente enfermo, y Brown realizó la película casi al completo en su lugar. De ahí que Tourneur decidiera otorgar a su discí-pulo la mitad del crédito. Pese a ello, la polémica al respecto de su autoría ha rodeado siempre al film. Tal controversia surge a raíz de que The Last of the Mohicans está considerada por unanimidad como la obra maestra de Tourneur. Este artículo se centra en dicha problemática autoral, con objeto de establecer las verdaderas atribuciones de los dos directores. Para ello, previamente se ha analizado su relación profesional, que abarcó desde 1915 hasta 1921. Con posterioridad, a fin de establecer el grado de participación de cada uno de ellos, se han reconstruido los hechos relativos al rodaje a través de entrevistas de los que participaron en él (muchas de ellas hasta la fecha inéditas), así como de materiales publicados por la prensa de la época. Se ha llevado a cabo la consulta y confrontación de abundante material bibliográfico y, finalmente, el análisis plástico de las imágenes de la cinta.Abstract:The American silent film The Last of the Mohicans (1920), based on the famous homonymous novel by James Fenimore Cooper, was released as co-directed by Maurice Tourneur and Clarence L. Brown. Initially, Tourneur was the producer and the only director, with Brown being his assistant. However, shortly after shooting began he fell seriously ill. As a result, the film was almost entirely directed by Brown. Hence Tourneur decided to share the credit with his disciple. Still, the controversy concerning authorship has always surrounded the film. Such polemic arises from the fact that The Last of the Mohicans is considered unanimously Tourneur’s masterpiece. This article focuses on that authorial problematic, with the aim of determining the real responsibilities of both directors. In order to achieve this objective, their professional relationship (which spans from 1915 to 1921) has been previously analysed. Subsequently, to establish the degree of participation of each of them, the facts of the shooting have been reconstructed using interviews (many of them unpublished) from those who took part in it, as well as through contemporary trade papers. In addition, research and confrontation on extensive bibliography have been carried out. Finally, the visual analysis of the images of the film has been evaluated.Palabras clave:Maurice Tourneur; Clarence Brown; Hollywood; Associated Producers, Inc.; cine mudo.Keywords:Maurice Tourneur; Clarence Brown; Hollywood; Associated Producers, Inc.; Silent film.


Author(s):  
Gwenda Young

Using archival sources from the Clarence Brown Archive at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville, newspaper clippings from a wide range of national and regional press, and unpublished interviews, this article explores how the complexities and contradictions that are central to Clarence Brown’s film version of Intruder in the Dust (1949)—complexities that, arguably, make this film the most ambiguous of all the “race issue” films released in 1949—are mirrored in the director’s own deeply divided attitude to race and to the South. These tensions also surface in the critical reception of the film in the white press, and perhaps more tellingly, in the black press of 1949. The notion that this was a film generally acclaimed in the black press can be challenged, or at the very least nuanced, through a closer examination of newspaper archives, which, in turn, reveals some of the divisions within black intellectual circles of the late 1940s.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document