scholarly journals Spherical aberration correction and Energy Filtering for Transmission Electron Microscope

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 382-389
Author(s):  
Eiji Okunishi
Author(s):  
M. G. R. Thomson

The variation of contrast and signal to noise ratio with change in detector solid angle in the high resolution scanning transmission electron microscope was discussed in an earlier paper. In that paper the conclusions were that the most favourable conditions for the imaging of isolated single heavy atoms were, using the notation in figure 1, either bright field phase contrast with β0⋍0.5 α0, or dark field with an annular detector subtending an angle between ao and effectively π/2.The microscope is represented simply by the model illustrated in figure 1, and the objective lens is characterised by its coefficient of spherical aberration Cs. All the results for the Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope (STEM) may with care be applied to the Conventional Electron Microscope (CEM). The object atom is represented as detailed in reference 2, except that ϕ(θ) is taken to be the constant ϕ(0) to simplify the integration. This is reasonable for θ ≤ 0.1 θ0, where 60 is the screening angle.


1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (S2) ◽  
pp. 620-621
Author(s):  
K.T. Moore ◽  
J.M. Howe

The dependence of diffraction contrast on electron energy loss is an important relationship that needs to be understood because of its potential effect on energy-filtering transmission electron microscope (EFTEM) images. Often when either a two-window jump-ratio image or a three-window elemental map is produced diffraction contrast is not totally eliminated and contributes to the intensity of the final EFTEM image. Background removal procedures often are unable to completely account for intensity changes due to dynamical effects (i.e., elastic scattering) that occur between images acquired at different energy losses, leaving artifacts in the final EFTEM image.In this study, the relationship between diffraction contrast and electron energy loss was investigated by obtaining EFTEM images of a bend contour in aluminum in 100 eV increments from 0 to 1000 eV (Fig. 1). EFTEM images were acquired a JOEL 2010F FEG TEM with a Gatan imaging filter (GIF) at a microscope magnification of 8 kX using a 1 eV/pixel dispersion, 2X binning (512 x 512) and exposure times ranging from 0.25 s for 0 eV energy loss up to 132 sec for 1000 eV energy loss.


2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (S2) ◽  
pp. 160-161
Author(s):  
R.D. Leapman ◽  
C.M. Brooks ◽  
N.W. Rizzo ◽  
T.L. Talbot

Electron energy loss spectrum-imaging (EELSI) in the energy filtering transmission electron microscope (EFTEM) can provide more accurate analysis of elemental distributions than that obtainable by the standard two-window or three-window background subtraction techniques. Spectra containing many channels can be extracted from regions of interest and analyzed using established methods for quantitation. For example, the pre-edge background can be fitted by an inverse power law and subtracted from the post-edge spectrum. EELSI in the EFTEM is often superior to spectrum-imaging in the scanning transmission electron microscope for mapping specimen regions of size greater than 1 μm. This is due the much larger total beam current that is available at the specimen in a fixed-beam microscope relative to a scanned-beam microscope. Our aim here is demonstrate the advantages of such EELSI measurements for analysis of biological specimens. However, we also indicate some potential pitfalls in acquiring elemental maps in the EFTEM, which can be attributed to specimen instabilities during the acquisition.


2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannes Lichte ◽  
Martin Linck ◽  
Dorin Geiger ◽  
Michael Lehmann

AbstractElectron holography has been shown to allow a posteriori aberration correction. Therefore, an aberration corrector in the transmission electron microscope does not seem to be needed with electron holography to achieve atomic lateral resolution. However, to reach a signal resolution sufficient for detecting single light atoms and very small interatomic fields, the aberration corrector has turned out to be very helpful. The basic reason is the optimized use of the limited number of “coherent” electrons that are provided by the electron source, as described by the brightness. Finally, quantitative interpretation of atomic structures benefits from the holographic facilities of fine-tuning of the aberration coefficients a posteriori and from evaluating both amplitude and phase.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document