Psychometric Data on the Group Embedded Figures Test for a Sample of Adult Learners

1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 583-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne L. Cummings ◽  
Harry G. Murray

The Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) was administered to 70 teachers taking a counseling course. Distribution characteristics, reliability, internal consistency, and sex differences are presented.

1988 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lissa S. E. McRae ◽  
Jeffrey D. Young

The Group Embedded Figures Test was administered to a group of 150 Canadian senior undergraduates in business administration. Distribution characteristics, sex differences, reliability, and internal consistency measures for this group were compared to previously published norms for samples of USA students.


1983 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 707-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardine De Sanctis ◽  
Robert Dunikoski

185 undergraduate students in business completed the Group Embedded-figures Test. Distribution characteristics, sex differences, reliability, internal consistency, and differences across independent samples were examined.


1980 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Carter ◽  
Robert Loo

The study examined the performance of 266 undergraduates on the Group Embedded-figures Test. Item analyses, distribution characteristics, internal consistency, sex differences, and differences across independent samples were examined.


1983 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 423-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc C. Mahlios ◽  
Karen D'Angelo

154 fifth-grade students (72 boys and 82 girls) were given the Group Embedded Figures Test. Distribution characteristics and sex differences were examined. Earlier norms developed for adult samples are substantially different from those of a sample of children. The norms presented here provide a guide for identification of field dependence in children.


1997 ◽  
Vol 84 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1135-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Joseph Murphy ◽  
Barbara Casey ◽  
Deborah A. Day ◽  
Jeffrey D. Young

The Group Embedded Figures Test was administered to 63 undergraduates in a program for a Bachelor of Applied Arts in Information Management. Distribution characteristics, sex differences, reliability, and internal consistency measures for this sample were compared with those for Witkin's original sample. In addition, item difficulty and discrimination coefficients are provided. Scores for this group show desirable measurement characteristics.


1980 ◽  
Vol 50 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1171-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Panek ◽  
Laura G. Funk ◽  
Pamela K. Nelson

Data from a previous investigation were reanalyzed to determine the split-half reliability and two forms of validity, i.e., internal consistency and construct, of the Group Embedded Figures Test across the life span. Subjects were 175 females, ranging in age from 17 to 72 yr., who fell into one of seven age groups. The Group Embedded Figures had adequate split-half reliability for the entire sample and for each age group. Significant, consistent differences between performance on Parts II and III of the GEFT were found. Estimates of internal consistency were adequate. Though satisfactory construct validity for the total correct on Parts II and III was obtained as correlations with the Portable-Rod-and-Frame Test for the entire sample, the construct validity of the Group Embedded Figures and separate parts was not adequately demonstrated within all age groups.


1985 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 707-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen V. Pincus

The study examined the performance of 124 practicing accountants on the Group Embedded Figures Test. Descriptive statistics and reliability measures for the sample of accountants were compared to previously published norms for samples of students. The accountants were significantly less field independent than two of the three samples of business students. Sex differences noted previously for liberal arts students were not observed for the accountants.


1994 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-79
Author(s):  
Reuben R. Rusch ◽  
Cynthia L. Trigg ◽  
Ray Brogan ◽  
Scott Petriquin

The validity and reliability of the Children's Group Embedded Figures Test was reported for students in Grade 2 by Cromack and Stone in 1980; however, a search of the literature indicates no evidence for internal consistency or item analysis. Hence the purpose of this study was to examine the item difficulty and item validity of the test with children in Grades 1 and 2. Confusion in the literature over development and use of this test was seemingly resolved through analysis of these descriptions and through an interview with the test developer. One early-appearing item was unreasonably difficult. Two or three other items were quite difficult and made little contribution to the total score. Caution is recommended, however, in any reordering or elimination of items based on these findings, given the limited number of subjects ( n = 84).


1985 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 653-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ed Cairns ◽  
Stephanie Malone ◽  
Jacqui Johnston ◽  
Tommy Cammock

1995 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 515-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Y. Mills

This study examined the performance of 49 accountants on the Group Embedded Figures Test and the Figural Intersections Test and used the two sets of scores to measure not only the accountants' field dependence-independence but also whether they may be mobile or fixed. This combination of test scores led to dividing accountants into one of four cognitive subtypes (field-independent scorers, both fixed and mobile, and field-dependent scorers, both fixed and mobile). The implications of mobility-fixity for accountants are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document