scholarly journals Multi-objectives Optimal Scheduling in Smart Energy Hub System with Electrical and Thermal Responsive Loads

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heydar Chamandoust ◽  
Ghasem Derakhshan ◽  
Seyed Mehdi Hakimi ◽  
Salah Bahramara

AbstractIn this study, multi-objective optimal scheduling of smart energy Hub system (SEHS) in the day ahead is proposed. A SEHS is comprising of interconnected energy hybrid system infrastructures such as electrical, thermal, wind, solar, natural gas and other fuels to supply many types of electrical and thermal loads in a two-way communication platform. All objectives in this paper, are minimized and consist of 1) operation cost and emission polluting in generation side, 2) loss of energy supply probability (LESP) in demand side, and 3) deviation of electrical and thermal loads with the optimal level of electrical and thermal profile in the day ahead. The third objective to flatten electrical and thermal demand profile using Demand Side Management (DSM) by the optimal shifting of electrical and thermal shiftable loads (SLs) is proposed. Also, stochastic modelling of renewable energy sources (RESs) and electrical and thermal loads by Monte Carlo technique is modelled. Using GAMS optimization software, proposed approach by ε -constraint method for obtaining to non-dominated Pareto solutions of objectives is implemented. Moreover, by the decision-making method, the best solution of non-dominated Pareto solutions is selected. Finally, two case studies and sensitivity analysis in case studies for confirmation of the proposed approach are analysed.

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (33) ◽  
pp. 16751-16772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Karkhaneh ◽  
Yousef Allahvirdizadeh ◽  
Heidarali Shayanfar ◽  
Sadjad Galvani

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 102731
Author(s):  
Elham Mokaramian ◽  
Hossein Shayeghi ◽  
Farzad Sedaghati ◽  
Amin Safari

2019 ◽  
Vol 236 ◽  
pp. 117584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heydar Chamandoust ◽  
Ghasem Derakhshan ◽  
Seyed Mehdi Hakimi ◽  
Salah Bahramara

Energy ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 979-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
A DEALMEIDA ◽  
A LOPES ◽  
A CARVALHO ◽  
J MARIANO ◽  
A JAHN ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Adams ◽  
Lisa Diamond ◽  
Tara Esterl ◽  
Peter Fröhlich ◽  
Rishabh Ghotge ◽  
...  

Executive Summary of the final report of the Users TCP Social License to Automate Task findings from a 2 year project with 16 researchers in 6 countries, 26 Case studies spanning electric vehicles, home and precinct batteries, air conditioners and other heat pumps.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Xu ◽  
Huizhen Pang ◽  
Bingzhe Zhang ◽  
Qixian Li ◽  
Yu Huang

2021 ◽  
pp. 47-65
Author(s):  
Alasdair R. Young

This chapter presents the qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of all twenty-three EU policies that were successfully challenged before the WTO with reasonable periods to comply expiring before the end of 2019 and for which policy change was necessary for compliance. The chapter discusses how the conditions associated with compliance in the literature—the power of the complainant, the nature of the policy, and the number of veto players—are operationalized. The QCA finds that none of the conditions were necessary for compliance. It does, however, suggest (in line with expectations) that trade policy was sufficient for prompt and sufficient policy change. Contrary to expectations, however, the QCA strongly suggests that the power of the complainant was not associated with policy change. The analysis also found no association between the number of veto players and policy change. The QCA, therefore, contradicts the demand-side explanation of compliance and is consistent with the supply-side explanation. The chapter explores why the power of the complainant is not associated with policy change. It also contextualizes and justifies the case studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document