scholarly journals Reaksi Pasar Atas Pengumuman Hasil Pemilihan Kabinet Kerja Jilid II Presiden Indonesia Tahun 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 2852
Author(s):  
I Gede Putra Subawa ◽  
Ni Putu Sri Harta Mimba

This study aims to determine the existence of market reaction to the Announcement of the Election Results of the Cabinet Work Volume II of the President of Indonesia in 2019. This research is an event study with event window for 7 days. The study was conducted on companies listed in the LQ-45 Index for the period August-January 2020. The population of this study were 45 companies listed in the LQ-45 index. The sampling method used is the purposive sampling method. Market reaction to the Announcement of the Election Results of the Cabinet Work Volume II of the President of Indonesia in 2019 was measured using abnormal returns. The data analysis technique used is the one-sample t-test. The test results show that there was a market reaction when the Announcement of the Results of the Election of Cabinet Work Volume II of the President of Indonesia in 2019. Keywords: Event Study; Work Cabinet Announcement; Abnormal Return.

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 1152
Author(s):  
Komang Winda Trinadewi ◽  
Gerianta Wirawan Yasa

This study aims to determine the market reaction to the PROPER announcement event and whether there are differences in market reactions between good ratings and poor PROPER ratings. This research is an event study with a window of events for 5 days. The study was conducted on PROPER participating companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2015 to 2017. The number of samples that met the criteria were 39 companies. PROPER announcements are measured using abnormal returns. The analysis technique used is the one sample t-test and the independent t-test. The test results show that the PROPER announcement was reacted negatively by the capital market, and there was no difference in market reaction between good ratings and bad ratings. Keywords : Event Study; Abnormal Return; Environmental Performance; PROPER.


Author(s):  
Alvin Fabian ◽  
Eko Budi Santoso

Abstract: This study aims to examine the differences in market reaction before and after the announcement of dividend omissions and dividend initiations in non- financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2018. The sample used in this study was 71 companies consisting of 26 companies that announced dividend omissions and 45 companies that announced dividend initiations. The sample was determined using the purposive sampling method. This study used the event study method with an event window period of 5 days before the announcement, the announcement day, and 5 days after the announcement. The Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test results in this study indicate that there are no differences in market reaction before and after the announcement of dividend omissions. Meanwhile the announcement of dividend initiations shows that there are differences in market reaction before and after the announcement of dividend initiations. Keywords: Event study, Dividend Omissions, Dividend Initiations, Abnormal Return


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1247
Author(s):  
Gede Rama Wirya Nanda ◽  
Made Gede Wirakusuma

This study aims to determine the market reaction to the momentum of Idul Fitri in 2019. This research is an event study with an observation period of 14 days. The study was conducted at companies classified as the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) in 2019. The population in this study was 30 companies. The sampling method used is the saturated sample method. Samples obtained were 30 companies. Market reaction to the momentum of Idul Fitri in 2019 is measured using abnormal returns and trading volume activity. The data analysis technique used is the one-sample t-test. The test results show that there is a market reaction during the Idul Fitri in 2019 which is indicated by a significant abnormal return and trading volume activity around the event date. This shows that Idul Fitri in 2019 caused a market reaction because of there was an information content of the event. Keywords: Event Study; Abnormal Return; Trading Volume Activity.


2019 ◽  
pp. 2432 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gede Krisna Dharma Putra ◽  
I Gusti Ayu Eka Damayanthi

CGPI is the result of research from the Indonesian Institute for Corporate Governance (IICG) in collaboration with SWA magazine. This study aims to determine the reaction of the capital market on the CGPI announcement. The research was conducted at the company surveyed by CGPI for the period 2013-2016 by accessing the Indonesia Stock Exchange, IICG, Yahoo finance and SWA magazines. The population in this study were the companies surveyed by the Corporate Governance Perception Index (CGPI) for the period 2013-2016. The number of samples taken was 61 using the purposive sampling method. The data analysis technique used is the one sample t-test. Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that during the seven days of stock trading around the announcement of the Corporate Governance Perception Index (CGPI) without involving the comfounding effect (other announcements) there was no market reaction around the CGPI announcement date. Keywords: Corporate Governance Perception Index (CGPI), abnormal return, market reaction


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Achmad Azis Fauzi ◽  
Ali Mutasowifin

Investing in stock instruments in the capital market is interesting for many investors, both local and foreign. However, when the price of stocks is considered too expensive, that will reduce the purchasing power of investors towards these shares and the liquidity of the shares will decrease as well that will impact the decreasing returns of investors. Overcoming this condition, companies often take corporate action in the form of a stock split. This study analyzes the effect of stock split on abnormal returns of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2019. Using a purposive sampling method (nonprobability sampling) we obtained 34 companies as a research sample. We use the event study approach for data processing in finding abnormal returns and t-test as well. This study classifies samples into two categories, complex sample category, and sectoral industries. The result shows that for the complex category, there are three out of eleven days of events that have an impact on abnormal returns marked by the t-test results greater than t-table. Whereas in each sectoral industries there are only five affected sectors, three unaffected sectors and one sector cannot be tested due to insufficient data. This result is also consistent with theories related to the stock split, signaling theory, and trading range theory.


2019 ◽  
pp. 1448
Author(s):  
Putu Gede Aditama Putra ◽  
I Gusti Ngurah Agung Suaryana

Every corporate action carried out by a company has the potential for information content as signal. The purpose of this study is to reexamine the market reaction to the announcement of the stock split proxied by using abnormal return. Testing information content will be done by looking at the cumulative abnormal return significance. The method of determining the sample is by nonprobability purposive sampling technique. The data analysis technique used was the One Sample t-test. The results of this study indicate there is a market reaction to the announcement of the stock split. This is indicated by the existence of abnormal returns around the announcement of the stock split. The results of this study theoretically can provide empirical evidence that strengthens the signaling theory that the information published by the issuer is reacted by the market, which shows that any accounting information that enters the capital market has information content. Keywords: Stock split, abnormal return.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-529
Author(s):  
Mohamad Hassan ◽  
Evangelos Giouvris

Purpose This study Investigates Shareholders' value adjustment in response to financial institutions (FIs) merger announcements in the immediate event window and in the extended event window. This study also investigates accounting measures performance, comparison of post-merger to pre-merger, including several cash flow measures and not just profitability measures, as the empirical literature review suggests. Finally, the authors examine FIs mergers orientations of diversification and focus create more value for shareholders (in the immediate announcement window and several months afterward) and/or generates better cash flows, profitability and less credit risk. Design/methodology/approach This study examines FIs merger effect on bidders’ shareholder’s value and on their observed performance. This examination deploys three techniques simultaneously: a) an event study analysis, to estimate and calculate abnormal returns (ARs) and cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) in the narrow windows of the merger announcement, b) buy and hold event study analysis, to estimate ARs in the wider window of the event, +50 to +230 days after the merger announcement and c) an observed performance analysis, of financial and capital efficiency measures before and after the merger announcement; return on equity, liquidity, cost to income ratio, capital to total assets ratio, net loans to total loans, credit risk, loans to deposits ratio, other expenses and total assets, economic value addition, weighted average cost of capital and return on invested capital. Deal criteria of value, mega-deals, strategic orientation (as in Ansoff (1980) growth strategies), acquiring bank size and payment method are set as individually as control variables. Findings Results show that FIs mergers destroy share value for the bidding firms pursuing a market penetration strategy. Market development and product development strategies enable shareholders’ value creation in short and long horizons. Diversification strategies do not influence bidding shareholders’ value. Local bank to bank mergers create shareholders’ value and enhance liquidity and economic value in the short run. Bank to bank cross border mergers create value for bidders’ in the long term but are associated with high costs and higher risks. Originality/value A significant advancement over the current literature is in assessing mergers, not only for bank bidders but also for the three pillars FIs of the financial sector; banks, real-estate companies and investment companies mergers. It is an improvement over current finance literature because it deploys two different strategies in the analysis. At a univariate level, shareholder value creation and market reaction to merger announcements are examined over short (−5 or +5 days) and long (+230 days) windows of the event. Followed by regressing, the resultant CARs and BHARs over financial performance variables at the multivariate level.


2018 ◽  
pp. 1870
Author(s):  
Ika Putri Adnyani ◽  
Gayatri Gayatri

This research is conducted on all acquisition companies that conduct acquisitions listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange 2011-2016 period. Sampling method using purposive sampling. The number of samples of this research is 50 companies. The market reaction in this study used abnormal return and trading volume activity. The testing of information content will be done by looking at differences in cumulative abnormal return and the average trading volume of shares five days before and five days after the announcement of the acquisition. Data analysis technique used is paired sample t-test. Based on the test results, found there are significant differences in the abnormal return of the acquirer company before and after the announcement of the acquisition. However, there is no difference in trading volume activity of the acquirer's stock before and after the acquisition announcement   Keywords: acquisitions, stock market, abnormal return, trading volume activity


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 1247-1262
Author(s):  
Kylie A. Braegelmann ◽  
Nacasius U. Ujah

PurposeThis paper aims to revisit the extant evidence on gender bias in the market. Specifically, it revisits reaction to CEO announcements. Also, it explores whether the development of the bias over time and by firm size aligns with existing theory.Design/methodology/approachThe paper examines cumulative abnormal returns around CEO announcements from 1992 through 2016 using a modified event study methodology. This evidence shown examines market reactions over time and by firm size.FindingsFinancial markets react more favorably to male CEO announcements, with a cumulative abnormal return of 49 basis points above the reaction to their female counterparts. Moreover, the paper finds that market reaction varies over time, which may be because of the increasing proportion of female CEOs, and by firm size, which may be due to the differences in new information available to investors.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations include sample size due to the paucity of female CEO announcements. This paper does not examine the effect of industry, detailed CEO characteristics or announcement content on market reaction. In addition, using an extended event window may increase the likelihood of capturing confounding events, such as mergers or earnings announcements, which limits the interpretability of the results.Practical implicationsGender bias in financial markets creates another institutional barrier for the advancement of female professionals, as well as implies inefficient capital allocation in markets.Originality/valueThe literature in this field is still inconclusive. Furthermore, bias development over time and the effect of information on bias remain unexplored. This study aims to fill that gap; furthermore, it introduces an extended event-window approach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 340
Author(s):  
Fitri Astuti ◽  
Anggi Setya Prayoga

This study intends to examine the differences in market reaction around the announcement of the Annual Report Award which is not only measured by abnormal return but is also measured using trading volume activity and stock prices. The data used are quantitative data in the form of a list of companies that received the Annual Report Award for the 2015-2018 period, the daily closing price of the ARA-winning company in the event window, the composite stock price index, the number of shares traded, and the number of shares outstanding. The event window is selected for 11 days because the long window period will blend with the effects of other events or confounding effects. The results of the study concluded that the market reacted around the announcement of the Annual Report Award for the 2015-2018 period measured using abnormal returns, trading volume activity, and stock prices. There is no difference in abnormal returns before and after the announcement of the 2013-2016 Annual Report Award period. Instead there are differences in trading volume activity and stock prices before and after the announcement of the Annual Report Award for the 2015-2018 period.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document