scholarly journals Pengaruh Dimensi Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Future Institutional Ownership

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Rizky Eriandani
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Measurement Instrument ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

<em>Corporate social responsibility practice becomes important subject in company`s activity, because it will affect the company's reputation. Besides, institutional investors likely prefer to invest in companies that have a social responsibility as it is considered to increase the legitimacy and future performance. This study aims to investigate the effect of CSR disclosure on institutional ownership. We use percentages ownership to measure institutional ownership. CSR measurement instrument used in this study adopted a previous research. The instrument comes from research Hackston and Milne, which was adjusted with Bapepam regulation in Indonesia. We also divided CSR disclosures in four sub-dimensions. The samples used in this research were 115 listed agriculture, mining, and manufacturing companies in indonesian Stock Exchange which studied during the years of 2010. Using SPSS 20, The analysis methods of this research used multiple regression analysis. Studies shows that not all dimensions of CSR disclosure effect on institutional ownership. Only product dimensions of CSR disclosures has a significant positive impact on institutional ownership. However, this paper fail to find any significant impact of another CSR dimensions. Thus, our study suggests that the dimensions of the product can affect investment decisions. In contrast, institutional investors have not focused on environment, employee relation, and community activities in investment decisions.</em>

scholarly journals Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Performance: Empirical Evidence from Indonesian Companies

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Fauzi ◽  
Lois Mahoney ◽  
Azhar Abdul Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
North American ◽  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Corporate Social

Prior research on the relationships of institutional ownership and corporate social responsibility has focused on North American (U.S. and Canada) and European companies.  With the passage of Indonesian Law No. 40 in 2007, Indonesian companies are now obligated to conduct CSP. As these companies objected to the passage of this law, awareness of how CSP may benefit Indonesian companies in terms of its positive impact on institutional investors needs to be investigated. Thus, this paper examines the relationships of IO and CSP for Indonesian companies. Unfortunately, contrary to the results for North American and European companies, we found no relationships between institutional ownership and corporate social responsibility for Indonesian companies. This finding suggests that most institutional investors do not include CSP as part of their investment decisions.  <br /><br />

scholarly journals Determinant of The Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure

ETIKONOMI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-172
Author(s):  
Uun Sunarsih ◽  
N. Nurhikmah
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Multiple Regression Analysis ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has a very important role for the company and now become an obligation for every company. The purpose of this study examined the effect of institutional ownership, board of commissioners, profitability and size on CSR disclosure. This research conducted at mining manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2013-2014 and obtained 76 sample companies. The method used is multiple regression analysis. The result showed only institutional ownership affecting CSR disclosure. This suggests institutional ownership structure can act in monitoring the company. Independent board has not effected on CSR, it failed to monitor the actions of top management. Profitability has not effected on the disclosure of CSR, it enabled the company to have two perspectives on CSR. The most companies view CSR as a deduction from earnings. CSR disclosure has not affect the size of the CSR disclosure area.DOI: 10.15408/etk.v16i2.5236

The effect of managerial and institutional ownership on corporate social responsibility disclosure

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurleni Nurleni ◽  
Agus Bandang ◽  
Darmawati Darmawati ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

PurposeThis study aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure that consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership of the extensive of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure.Design/methodology/approachThe population in this study is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI), as the manufacturing companies are considered to have great potential on environmental damage (Mathews, 2000). The selected sample were the companies which meet certain criteria (purposive sampling) which published the complete annual financial statements from 2011 to 2015. This study used an analysis method using partial least square (WarpPLS) to assess the effect of the structure of ownership consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership on the extent of the CSR disclosure.FindingsThe results showed that there is a direct effect of a negative and significant correlation between managerial ownership on CSR disclosure, and there is a direct effect of a positive and significant correlation between institutional ownership on CSR disclosure.Originality/valueOriginality of this paper shows PLS (WarpPLS) that applied to determine the effect between variables managerial and institutional ownership on CSR disclosure. This research is collected data financial statements and annual reports of manufacturing companies obtained from the Indonesia Capital Market Reference Center (PRPM), which is located in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), which there has not been research by the methods and the same location.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF EFFECT OF FIRM SIZE, INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP, PROFITABILITY, AND LEVERAGE ON FIRM VALUE WITH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) DISCLOSURE AS INTERVENING VARIABLES (Study on Banking Companies Listed on BEI Period 2012-2016)

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Fitria Yuni Astuti ◽  
Sugeng Wahyudi ◽  
Wisnu Mawardi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Shareholder Wealth ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

The main objective of the company survives in the stringent competitive by maximizing the value of the company to shareholder wealth. Firm value is experiencing a downward trend is a problem that must be resolved. The banking company also undertakes a social responsibility that is perceived to have a positive impact on the company's image. This study aimed to analyze the effect of the firm size, institutional ownership, profitability, and leverage with corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure as a variable intervening.Populations are banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2012-2016. Sampling technique used is purposive sampling with 29 companies selected according to predetermined criteria. This research is done by using multiple linear regression analysis methods and path analysis also Sobel test to examine the effect of intervening. Test results with CSRD as the dependent variable indicate that institutional ownership and Leverage have no effect on CSRD While firm size and profitability (ROA) have a positive significant effect on CSRD. The result of testing with Firm Value (Tobins'Q) as the dependent variable indicates that Firm Size, Institutional Ownership, and Profitability (ROA) have no effect on Firm Value (Tobins'Q). Leverage (DAR) has a negative and significant influence on Firm  Value (Tobins'Q) while CSRD has a significant positive effect on Firm Value (Tobins'Q). CSRD does not mediate the effect of Institutional Ownership, Profitability (ROA) and Leverage (DAR) on Firm Value (Tobins'Q). CSRD mediates the effect of Firm Size on Firm Value (Tobins'Q).

scholarly journals Institutional Ownership and Value Relevance of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from China

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2311
Author(s):  
Ramiz ur Rehman ◽  
Zahid Riaz ◽  
Charles Cullinan ◽  
Junrui Zhang ◽  
Fanghua Wang
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Market Value ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship

We examine the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and firm value in China. Using a sample of listed companies on the Shanghai Stock Exchange from 2008 to 2012, we find that market value of a firm is higher when a company makes a lower level of CSR disclosure. Other things being equal, this relationship becomes positive when the CSR disclosure is moderated with the institutional ownership. With regard to the CSR disclosure, we found consistent results with respect to the little evidence that the amount of CSR disclosure is significantly associated with market value among those companies who chose to provide CSR disclosures. Taken together, these results indicate that the decision to disclose or not to disclose CSR information is value relevant to the level of institutional investors. These findings are important as they have made an attempt to resolve the earlier contradictory findings with respect to the relationship between market value and CSR disclosure. Furthermore, it has highlighted the value relevance of CSR disclosure regarding the type of shareholders/institutional investors.

scholarly journals Determinant of The Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence of Indonesian Manufacturing Companies

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Arfan Ikhsan ◽  
Nurlaila Nurlaila ◽  
Herkulanus Bambang Suprasto ◽  
Febi Yanti Batubara
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Ceo Power ◽  
Board Capital ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

Following the necessity to provide transparent information on social activities, corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure is important for companies in Indonesia. This study aims to examine and analyze the effect of information ofCEO Power (CEOP), Board Capital (BCAPDUM), Media Disclosure (PMED), and Profitability (ROA) on CSR. This research usedmanufacturing companies listed on the IDX in 2016 as the subject. Using thepurposive sampling method, 26 companies were selected as the research sample. Research findings showed thatCEOP, PMED, and ROA haveastatistical effect on CSR disclosure, whereas BCAPDUM has no effect on CSR disclosure. Therefore, CEOP, PMED, and ROA have a positive and significant effect on CSR disclosure. Keywords:   CEO Power, Board Capital, Media Disclosure, Profitability, CSR

scholarly journals The Influence of Ownership Structure and Income Management on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 1074-1079
Author(s):  
Fathimah F. Farhah ◽  
Iranti Safriyana
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Foreign Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Corporate Social

The purpose of this study is to provide evidence of the influence of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, foreign ownership, and earnings management of corporate social responsibility disclosure. The sample used was 15 companies with a purposive sampling method. The data used in this study uses secondary data in the form of annual financial reports and annual reports of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2014-2017. The study results found that managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and earnings management have no significant impact on corporate social responsibility disclosure. However, foreign ownership has a significant effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure.

scholarly journals Corporate Social Responsibility, Investment Decisions, and Managerial Ownership on Value of The Company : Evidence from Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 268-285
Author(s):  
Kenny Ardillah ◽  
Thenia Thenia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Corporate Social

This study aims to prove the influence of corporate social responsibility, investment decisions and managerial ownership on value of the company. Theories used in this research are agency theory and signal theory. This research was done on all manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2016-2018. The sampling method used is purposive sampling technique and the data analysis method used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study show that corporate social responsibility and managerial ownership have no influence on value of the company, while investment decisions have a positive influence on value of the company. Few suggestions for the further research are adjust research periods, use other criteria of sample, use other indicators such as funding decisions, company size, other corporate governance indicators, or use other methods to measure value of the company.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility terhadap Cost Of Equity Perusahaan

Telaah Bisnis ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitta Ariyani ◽  
Yeterina Widi Nugrahanti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Equity Capital ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Cost Of Equity Capital ◽  
Cost Of Equity ◽  
Financial Leverage ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

AbstractThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure on Cost of Equity Capital. CSR disclosure index is measured based on Global Reporting Initiative standards, while Cost of Equity Capital is measured by Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). This study uses manufacturing companies which is listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2010. By purposive sampling, this research obtained 72 companies as a samples. The control variables used are financial leverage and firm size. Multiple regression analysis by SPSS 16 was run for testing the hypothesis. The result show that CSR disclosure and financial leverage have no effect to Cost of Equity. Then, firm size have positive effect to Cost of Equity.

scholarly journals Karakteristik Perusahaan dan Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar Di BEI

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Novi Prasanti ◽  
Tatang Ary Gumanti ◽  
Lilik Farida
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Company Size ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Corporate Social

AbstractThis study aims to examine and analyze the effect of company size, audit committee, and institutional ownership on the level of Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure. The objects of this research are the manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange years 2015- 2017. The study employes multiple regression analysis to examine the effect of the independent variables on the dependent variable. The samples comprise a total of 93 companies that have met the predetermined criteria. The hypotheses were tested using multiple linear regression analysis. The results of the study show that only company size has a positive and significant effect on the level of CSR disclosure. Meanwhile, audit committees and institutional ownership do not have significant effect on the level of CSR disclosure.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh ukuran perusahaan, komite audit dan kepemilikan institusional terhadap derajat pengungkapan tangung jawab social perusahaan (Corporate Social Responsibility = CSR). Objek penelitian ini adalah  perusahaan manufatur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2015-2017. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi berganda untuk menguji pengaruh variabel-variabel bebas terhadap variabel terikat. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 93 perusahaan yang memenuhi ketentuan kriteria. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi linier beganda.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hanya ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap pengungkapan CSR. Sedangkan, komite audit dan kepemilikan institusional tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap pengungkapan CSR.Kata Kunci: kepemilikan institusional; komite audit; pengungkapan csr; ukuran perusahaan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document