scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF EFFECT OF FIRM SIZE, INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP, PROFITABILITY, AND LEVERAGE ON FIRM VALUE WITH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) DISCLOSURE AS INTERVENING VARIABLES (Study on Banking Companies Listed on BEI Period 2012-2016)

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Fitria Yuni Astuti ◽  
Sugeng Wahyudi ◽  
Wisnu Mawardi

The main objective of the company survives in the stringent competitive by maximizing the value of the company to shareholder wealth. Firm value is experiencing a downward trend is a problem that must be resolved. The banking company also undertakes a social responsibility that is perceived to have a positive impact on the company's image. This study aimed to analyze the effect of the firm size, institutional ownership, profitability, and leverage with corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure as a variable intervening.Populations are banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2012-2016. Sampling technique used is purposive sampling with 29 companies selected according to predetermined criteria. This research is done by using multiple linear regression analysis methods and path analysis also Sobel test to examine the effect of intervening. Test results with CSRD as the dependent variable indicate that institutional ownership and Leverage have no effect on CSRD While firm size and profitability (ROA) have a positive significant effect on CSRD. The result of testing with Firm Value (Tobins'Q) as the dependent variable indicates that Firm Size, Institutional Ownership, and Profitability (ROA) have no effect on Firm Value (Tobins'Q). Leverage (DAR) has a negative and significant influence on Firm  Value (Tobins'Q) while CSRD has a significant positive effect on Firm Value (Tobins'Q). CSRD does not mediate the effect of Institutional Ownership, Profitability (ROA) and Leverage (DAR) on Firm Value (Tobins'Q). CSRD mediates the effect of Firm Size on Firm Value (Tobins'Q).

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Rizky Eriandani

<em>Corporate social responsibility practice becomes important subject in company`s activity, because it will affect the company's reputation. Besides, institutional investors likely prefer to invest in companies that have a social responsibility as it is considered to increase the legitimacy and future performance. This study aims to investigate the effect of CSR disclosure on institutional ownership. We use percentages ownership to measure institutional ownership. CSR measurement instrument used in this study adopted a previous research. The instrument comes from research Hackston and Milne, which was adjusted with Bapepam regulation in Indonesia. We also divided CSR disclosures in four sub-dimensions. The samples used in this research were 115 listed agriculture, mining, and manufacturing companies in indonesian Stock Exchange which studied during the years of 2010. Using SPSS 20, The analysis methods of this research used multiple regression analysis. Studies shows that not all dimensions of CSR disclosure effect on institutional ownership. Only product dimensions of CSR disclosures has a significant positive impact on institutional ownership. However, this paper fail to find any significant impact of another CSR dimensions. Thus, our study suggests that the dimensions of the product can affect investment decisions. In contrast, institutional investors have not focused on environment, employee relation, and community activities in investment decisions.</em>


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-147
Author(s):  
Annisa Fitri Gea ◽  
Debbi Chyntia Ovami

The company's goal is to implement CSR to have a positive impact on the environment and society as a sense of social responsibility to the environment around the company. Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) will also increase the value of the company. The value of a company will increase if the company pays attention to the economic, social and environmental or environmental dimensions that exist around the company. This study aims to determine the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure on company value in consumer goods industry companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2016-2018. The method used in this research is quantitative method. The population in this study were consumer goods industry companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2016-2018 totaling 53 companies. The sampling technique uses a purposive sampling method with a sample of 15 companies. Analysis of the data used is simple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has a positive and significant effect on firm value with a coefficient of 2169,806 and a significance of 0,000


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1767
Author(s):  
Gusti Ayu Made Rita Susanti ◽  
I Gusti Ayu Nyoman Budiasih

The purpose of this study is to prove empirically the effect of disclosure of corporate social responsibility and profitability on the value of mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2015-2017. Samples were selected using purposive sampling technique to obtain a total sample of 15 companies, so the number of observations with a study period of 3 years was 45 observations. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis. After analyzing the data, the results obtained from CSR disclosure did not affect the value of the company and found a positive relationship between profitability and firm value. Keywords : Disclosure of corporate social responsibility, profitability, the value of the company.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-71
Author(s):  
Novi Yanti ◽  
Sarwani Sarwani ◽  
Novika Rosari

Company value is considered necessary for interested parties both internally and externally when making investments. This study examines and analyzes the influence of Company Characteristics (Firm Size, Capital Structure, and Profitability) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure moderated by Good Corporate Governance on Firm Value. There are 188 manufacturing companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), the population with 22 sample companies in the 2016-2018 period. The sampling technique was the purposive sampling method. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression and moderated regression analysis on SPSS. This study indicates that the capital structure and good governance affect firm value, and the firm size variable shows a negative effect. Good Corporate Governance can strengthen the influence of firm size, capital structure, and CSR disclosure on firm value, while good governance weakens the effect of profitability on firm value, which is of interest. 


Author(s):  
Reghita Nabilla Shafira ◽  
Siti Nur Azizah ◽  
Sri Wahyuni ◽  
Hadi Pramono

The purpose of this study is to empirically prove the effect of firm size and corporate governance structure (such as board of commissioner size, institutional ownership and managerial ownership) on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure. The samples in this study were the mining companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 using the purposive sampling method. Based on the criteria, there were 58 samples of research data. The data analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicated that company size, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership have no effect on CSR disclosure. Meanwhile, the size of the board of commissioners has a positive effect on CSR disclosure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 2774
Author(s):  
Gusti Ayu Intan Puspita Dewi ◽  
I Dewa Nyoman Badera

This study aims to examine the effect of corporate social responsibility disclosure and good corporate governance mechanisms on firm value. Elements of the good corporate governance mechanism are proxied into audit committees, independent commissioners, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership. The tests were carried out on mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2019. The sample was selected using purposive sampling technique. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. The results show that the more companies increase the disclosure of corporate social responsibility, the impact on increasing the value of the company. Maximizing the function of the audit committee, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership can increase firm value. However, maximizing the function of independent commissioners has no effect on increasing firm value. Keywords : Corporate social responsibility; Good corporate governance; Firm Value.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 76-96
Author(s):  
La Ode Anto La Ode Anto

This study aims to determine the effect of profitability and firm size on firm value through the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR Disclosure). The sample in this study was 105 objects of observation obtained using purposive sampling technique from manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The analytical method used is descriptive analysis and path analysis. The results show that profitability has a negative and significant effect on CSR disclosure but is positive and significant on firm value, while firm size has a positive and significant effect on CSR disclosure but is positive and not significant on firm value, while CSR disclosure has a positive and significant effect on firm value and able to mediate the effect of profitability and firm size on firm value.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2311
Author(s):  
Ramiz ur Rehman ◽  
Zahid Riaz ◽  
Charles Cullinan ◽  
Junrui Zhang ◽  
Fanghua Wang

We examine the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and firm value in China. Using a sample of listed companies on the Shanghai Stock Exchange from 2008 to 2012, we find that market value of a firm is higher when a company makes a lower level of CSR disclosure. Other things being equal, this relationship becomes positive when the CSR disclosure is moderated with the institutional ownership. With regard to the CSR disclosure, we found consistent results with respect to the little evidence that the amount of CSR disclosure is significantly associated with market value among those companies who chose to provide CSR disclosures. Taken together, these results indicate that the decision to disclose or not to disclose CSR information is value relevant to the level of institutional investors. These findings are important as they have made an attempt to resolve the earlier contradictory findings with respect to the relationship between market value and CSR disclosure. Furthermore, it has highlighted the value relevance of CSR disclosure regarding the type of shareholders/institutional investors.


ETIKONOMI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-172
Author(s):  
Uun Sunarsih ◽  
N. Nurhikmah

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has a very important role for the company and now become an obligation for every company. The purpose of this study examined the effect of institutional ownership, board of commissioners, profitability and size on CSR disclosure. This research conducted at mining manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2013-2014 and obtained 76 sample companies. The method used is multiple regression analysis. The result showed only institutional ownership affecting CSR disclosure. This suggests institutional ownership structure can act in monitoring the company. Independent board has not effected on CSR, it failed to monitor the actions of top management. Profitability has not effected on the disclosure of CSR, it enabled the company to have two perspectives on CSR. The most companies view CSR as a deduction from earnings. CSR disclosure has not affect the size of the CSR disclosure area.DOI: 10.15408/etk.v16i2.5236


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document