scholarly journals Estimating the Reliability Function of some Stress- Strength Models for the Generalized Inverted Kumaraswamy Distribution

2021 ◽  
pp. 240-251
Author(s):  
Hakeem Hussain Hamad ◽  
Nada Sabah Karam
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Shape Parameter ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimators ◽  
Reliability Function ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Kumaraswamy Distribution ◽  
Scale Parameters ◽  
Strength Models ◽  
Best Estimator

This paper discusses reliability of the stress-strength model. The reliability functions 𝑅1 and 𝑅2 were obtained for a component which has an independent strength and is exposed to two and three stresses, respectively. We used the generalized inverted Kumaraswamy distribution GIKD with unknown shape parameter as well as known shape and scale parameters. The parameters were estimated from the stress- strength models, while the reliabilities 𝑅1, 𝑅2 were estimated by three methods, namely the Maximum Likelihood,  Least Square, and Regression.  A numerical simulation study a comparison between the three estimators by mean square error is performed. It is found that best estimator between the three estimators is Maximum likelihood estimators.  

scholarly journals Estimating the Reliability Function of (2+1) Cascade Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 0395
Author(s):  
Khaleel Et al.
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Likelihood Estimation ◽  
Reliability Function ◽  
Cascade Model ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Estimate Reliability ◽  
Best Estimator

This paper discusses reliability R of the (2+1) Cascade model of inverse Weibull distribution. Reliability is to be found when strength-stress distributed is inverse Weibull random variables with unknown scale parameter and known shape parameter. Six estimation methods (Maximum likelihood, Moment, Least Square, Weighted Least Square, Regression and Percentile) are used to estimate reliability. There is a comparison between six different estimation methods by the simulation study by MATLAB 2016, using two statistical criteria Mean square error and Mean Absolute Percentage Error, where it is found that best estimator between the six estimators is Maximum likelihood estimation method.

scholarly journals Estimating the Reliability Function of (2+1) Cascade Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 0395
Author(s):  
Khaleel Et al.
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Likelihood Estimation ◽  
Reliability Function ◽  
Cascade Model ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Estimate Reliability ◽  
Best Estimator

This paper discusses reliability R of the (2+1) Cascade model of inverse Weibull distribution. Reliability is to be found when strength-stress distributed is inverse Weibull random variables with unknown scale parameter and known shape parameter. Six estimation methods (Maximum likelihood, Moment, Least Square, Weighted Least Square, Regression and Percentile) are used to estimate reliability. There is a comparison between six different estimation methods by the simulation study by MATLAB 2016, using two statistical criteria Mean square error and Mean Absolute Percentage Error, where it is found that best estimator between the six estimators is Maximum likelihood estimation method.

Using Approximation Non-Bayesian Computation with Fuzzy Data to Estimation Inverse Weibull Parameters and Reliability Function

2018 ◽  
pp. 397
Author(s):  
Nadia Hashim Al-Noor ◽  
Shurooq A.K. Al-Sultany
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Expectation Maximization ◽  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimators ◽  
Reliability Function ◽  
Fuzzy Data ◽  
Monte Carlo Simulation Study ◽  
Weibull Parameters ◽  
Squared Error ◽  
Newton Raphson

        In real situations all observations and measurements are not exact numbers but more or less non-exact, also called fuzzy. So, in this paper, we use approximate non-Bayesian computational methods to estimate inverse Weibull parameters and reliability function with fuzzy data. The maximum likelihood and moment estimations are obtained as non-Bayesian estimation. The maximum likelihood estimators have been derived numerically based on two iterative techniques namely “Newton-Raphson” and the “Expectation-Maximization” techniques. In addition, we provide compared numerically through Monte-Carlo simulation study to obtained estimates of the parameters and reliability function in terms of their mean squared error values and integrated mean squared error values respectively.

scholarly journals Classical and Bayesian Inference of Conditional Stress-Strength Model under Kumaraswamy Distribution

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Fathy H. Riad ◽  
Mohammad Mehdi Saber ◽  
Mehrdad Taghipour ◽  
M. M. Abd El-Raouf
Keyword(s):  
Bayesian Inference ◽  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Asymptotic Distribution ◽  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Bootstrap Method ◽  
Strength Model ◽  
Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Kumaraswamy Distribution ◽  
Strength Models

Stress-strength models have been frequently studied in recent years. An applicable extension of these models is conditional stress-strength models. The maximum likelihood estimator of conditional stress-strength models, asymptotic distribution of this estimator, and its confidence intervals are obtained for Kumaraswamy distribution. In addition, Bayesian estimation and bootstrap method are applied to the model.

scholarly journals Maximum likelihood estimation in location-scale families using varied L ranked set sampling

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amer Al-Omari
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimators ◽  
Likelihood Estimation ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Ranked Set Sampling ◽  
Sampling Schemes ◽  
Scale Parameters ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Family Of Distributions

Recently, a generalized ranked set sampling (RSS) scheme has been introduced which encompasses several existing RSS schemes, namely varied L RSS (VLRSS), and it provides more precise estimators of the population mean than the estimators with the traditional simple random sampling (SRS) and RSS schemes. In this paper, we extend the work and consider the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of the location and scale parameters when sampling from a location-scale family of distributions. In order to give more insight into the performance of VLRSS with respect to SRS and RSS schemes, the asymptotic relative precisions of the MLEs using VLRSS relative to that using SRS and RSS are compared for some usual location-scale distributions. It turns out that the MLEs with VLRSS are more precise than those with the existing sampling schemes.

scholarly journals Robustness Test of the Two Stage K-L Estimator in Models with Multicollinear Regressors and Autocorrelated Error Term

2021 ◽  
pp. 22-33
Author(s):  
Zubair Mohammed Anono ◽  
Adenomon Monday Osagie
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Mean Square Error ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Real Life Data

In a classical multiple linear regression analysis, multicollinearity and autocorrelation are two main basic assumption violation problems. When multicollinearity exists, biased estimation techniques such as Maximum Likelihood, Restricted Maximum Likelihood and most recent the K-L estimator by Kibria and Lukman [1] are preferable to Ordinary Least Square. On the other hand, when autocorrelation exist in the data, robust estimators like Cochran Orcutt and Prais-Winsten [2] estimators are preferred. To handle these two problems jointly, the study combines the K-L with the Prais-Winsten’s two-stage estimator producing the Two-Stage K-L estimator proposed by Zubair & Adenomon [3]. The Mean Square Error (MSE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) criterion was used to compare the performance of the estimators. Application of the estimators to two (2) real life data set with multicollinearity and autocorrelation problems reveals that the Two Stage K-L estimator is generally the most efficient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document