Anesthesia in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 409-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica R. Thaler ◽  
Allan Gottschalk ◽  
Ruwanthi Samaranayake ◽  
Donald C. Lanza ◽  
David W. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Anesthetic Techniques ◽  
Critical Importance ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
The Past ◽  
High Level ◽  
Subjective Level

Successful administration of anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery is of critical importance for patient comfort, to reduce bleeding, and for procedure safety. However, surgeons are often reluctant to perform the procedure under local anesthesia with sedation. Over the past four years, patients undergoing ESS have been asked to complete a questionnaire to evaluate their anesthetic experience. A total of 111 completed questionnaires were returned for evaluation. The questionnaire evaluated subjective level of pain, nausea, vomiting, and overall unpleasantness of surgery on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The results from this survey indicate a high level of patient satisfaction with our current anesthetic techniques, while identifying issues with postoperative nausea and vomiting. The results of the survey and a review of the anesthetic issues involved in successfully performing endoscopic sinus surgery are discussed.

Anesthetic Choice for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Fornadley ◽  
Kevin S. Kennedy ◽  
Joseph F. Wilson ◽  
Peter T. Galantich ◽  
Gregg S. Parker
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Anesthetic Technique ◽  
Anesthetic Techniques ◽  
Local Infiltration ◽  
Local Technique ◽  
Local Anesthetic Injection

Controversy continues concerning the optimal anesthetic technique when completing endoscopic sinus surgery. To attempt to investigate the results using different anesthetic techniques, experience with endoscopic sinus surgery over 12 months (233 cases) was retrospectively reviewed. The use of local anesthetic injection with or without regional blocks (specifically ethmoid and greater palatine) was evaluated, as was the choice of general anesthesia versus local technique in a context of blood loss, patient comfort, and complications. Regional block technique appears to add morbidity for little additional benefit. Endoscopic sinus surgery may be performed safely in appropriately selected patients using either general anesthesia or local infiltration with sedation.

Assessment of a Lateral Nasal Wall Block Technique for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Under Local Anesthesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace M. Scott ◽  
Chris Diamond ◽  
Damian C. Micomonaco
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Lateral Nasal Wall ◽  
Anesthetic Techniques ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Wall Block ◽  
Narcotic Analgesia ◽  
Anesthesia Technique ◽  
Strongly Agree

Introduction With increasingly limited operative resources and patient desires for minimally invasive procedures, there is a trend toward local endoscopic procedures being performed in the outpatient clinic setting. However, there remain limited data supporting a technique to adequately anesthetize the lateral nasal wall and provide patient comfort during these procedures. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of a novel lateral nasal wall block for use in office-based endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods A prospective cohort study assessing consecutive patients undergoing office-based endoscopic sinus surgery using our described lateral nasal wall block anesthesia technique. Procedural patient comfort was assessed using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS), completed by participants immediately following an office-based endoscopic procedure and prior to discharge from clinic. Postoperative analgesic use was assessed at the first postoperative visit. Results Thirty-five consecutive patients undergoing office-based outpatient endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis (with and without polyps) were assessed. The mean ISAS score was 2.83 (95% confidence interval: [2.69, 2.97]). All participants (100%) agree or strongly agree that they were satisfied with their anesthesia care and would want the same anesthetic again. No participant required narcotic analgesia, and 80% used no oral analgesia following the procedure. Conclusions Recent advances in office-based endonasal surgical procedures must be accompanied by the assessment and validation of local anesthetic techniques. The described novel lateral nasal wall block is well tolerated, provides patient satisfaction, and allows for limited use of postprocedure oral analgesics.

Endoscopic Septal Spur Resection

1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 213-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald C. Lanza ◽  
Deborah Farb Rosin ◽  
David W. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Chronic Sinusitis ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Postoperative Results ◽  
Valuable Alternative ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity ◽  
The Past ◽  
Septal Spur

A variety of surgical approaches exists for the management of nasal septal spurs in patients who undergo endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Treatment of septal spurs in the past has been frequently addressed by septoplasty which can result in increased bleeding and length of surgical procedure as well as mandate postoperative nasal packing. Individually each of these problems can jeopardize the success of endoscopic sinus surgery. An endoscopic approach, which targets the septal spur alone, can minimize perioperative morbidity. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the effectiveness of endoscopic septal spur resection (ESSR) for the management of significant septal spurs in 8 patients who underwent concurrent ESSR during ESS for chronic sinusitis. Surgical technique and postoperative results are discussed and suggest that ESSR is a valuable alternative to more traditional techniques.

The Effect of FloSeal on Mucosal Healing after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Comparison with Thrombin-Soaked Gelatin Foam

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh K. Chandra ◽  
David B. Conley ◽  
Robert C. Kern
Keyword(s):  
Granulation Tissue ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Adhesion Formation ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Nasal Packing ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Rapid Healing ◽  
Extent Of Surgery ◽  
High Degree

Background The optimal form of nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) still has not been established. Although wide variations exist among sinus surgeons, the goals are adequate hemostasis, rapid healing, and patient comfort. Preliminary studies indicated that FloSeal (FS), a novel absorbable hemostatic paste used as a nasal pack, was associated with minimal postoperative discomfort and effective hemostasis. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of this agent on mucosal healing in ESS. Methods Twenty consecutive patients underwent bilateral ESS. For each patient, one ethmoid cavity was randomized to receive FS and the other received thrombin-soaked gelatin foam. The extent of granulation tissue and adhesion formation was evaluated at 6–8 weeks after surgery. Results No significant differences were observed between the FS and the thrombin-soaked gelatin foam groups with respect to the preoperative Lund-Mackay score, extent of surgery performed, or need for additional nasal packing. However, the FS group showed clear trends toward increased granulation tissue (p = 0.007) and adhesion (p = 0.006) formation. Conclusion: Absorbable hemostatic agents are associated with a high degree of patient comfort and provide hemostasis comparable with traditional techniques. Different materials may induce differential patterns of mucosal healing, potentially affecting the ultimate result of ESS.

scholarly journals In-office Balloon Dilation and Drainage of Frontal Sinus Mucocele

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. ar.2013.4.0041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Anderson Eloy ◽  
Pratik A. Shukla ◽  
Osamah J. Choudhry ◽  
Jean Daniel Eloy ◽  
Paul D. Langer
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Balloon Dilation ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Surgical Drainage ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
The Past ◽  
Office Procedures

Treatment of frontal sinus disease represents one of the most challenging aspects of endoscopic sinus surgery. Frontal sinus mucocele drainage may be an exception to the rule because in many instances, the expansion of the mucocele widens the frontal sinus recess and renders surgical drainage technically undemanding. Recently, there has been an increased interest in in-office procedures in otolaryngology because of patient satisfaction and substantial savings of time and cost for both patients and physicians. Similarly, the past few years have witnessed an increased use of balloon dilation devices in sinus surgery. Previously, we have described the in-office use of this device in treating patients who failed prior conventional frontal sinusotomy in the operating room. In this report, we describe our step-by-step in-office experience using this tool for drainage of a large frontal sinus mucocele.

The Incidence of Concurrent Osteitis in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Clinicopathological Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jivianne T. Lee ◽  
David W. Kennedy ◽  
James N. Palmer ◽  
Michael Feldman ◽  
Alexander G. Chiu
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Mean ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Inflammatory Changes

Background The pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has been found to be multifactorial, with environmental, general host, and local anatomic factors all contributing to its development. Recent studies have indicated that local osteitis of the underlying bone also may play a critical role in the elaboration of CRS by inducing persistent inflammatory changes in the surrounding mucosa. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical incidence rate of osteitis in patients with CRS undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods From January to July 2003, a prospective study was performed on 121 patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery for CRS. Age, number of previous surgeries, radiographic bony characteristics, and pathological findings were all documented. The presence of concurrent osteitis was assessed using both radiographic (neoosteogenesis) and pathological (bony remodeling) criteria. Results The mean age of the patients was 44.3 years. Fifty-eight percent of the cases were revision surgeries, with each patient having an average of 2.2 operative procedures in the past. Computed tomography (CT) showed neoosteogenesis in 36% of patients, and 53% showed pathological evidence of osteitis on histological analysis of surgical specimens. Conclusion Concurrent osteitis can be found in 36–53% of patients with CRS, using both radiographic and pathological criteria, respectively. Although a causal relationship between osteitis and CRS can not be inferred from this data, these clinical findings correlate well with previous evidence of bone involvement in CRS found in animal models, further reaffirming the association between underlying osteitis and the pathogenesis of CRS.

scholarly journals Nasal Suction System for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-12
Author(s):  
Preetam Chappity
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Simple Technique ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Accurate Analysis ◽  
Suction System ◽  
The Past ◽  
Continuous Suction

ABSTRACT Introduction Endoscopic sinus surgery has developed significantly in the past decade. The indications and the frequency of the surgery have increased tremendously. Performing this surgery in an awake patient under local anesthesia has numerous additional inherent problems as opposed to surgery under general anesthesia. Technique Our ‘Continuous Suction Assembly’ is a simple yet effective answer to these problems. It helps in providing a clear field during surgery. It also prevents aspiration and fogging and aids in accurate analysis of intraoperative blood loss. Conclusion Continuous suction technique is a cost-effective, simple technique to prevent many problems inherent to endoscopic sinus surgery under both local and general anesthesia. With proper preoperative counseling, the patient discomfort and cooperation can be improved drastically. How to cite this article Chappity P. Nasal Suction System for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Clin Rhinol An Int J 2014;7(1):10-12.

Objective and Subjective Assessment of Nasal Obstruction in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 307-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nesil Keleş ◽  
Ömer Cenker Ilicali ◽  
Kemal Değer
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Subjective Assessment ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Nasal Resistance ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Mucosal Edema ◽  
Objective Improvement ◽  
Active Anterior Rhinomanometry

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is the surgical treatment of choice for many physicians in chronic inflammatory diseases of the sinuses. Although subjective benefit has been claimed after surgery, there are not enough studies reporting objective improvement. We evaluated 40 patients undergoing FESS for chronic and recurrent sinusitis with visual analog scale (VAS) scoring of sensation of nasal obstruction and active anterior rhinomanometry of nasal resistance. The results of postoperative measurements demonstrated that baseline total nasal resistance measured with rhinomanometry and evaluated with VAS scoring (baseline and after decongestion) were significantly lower than preoperative measurements. However, improvement in nasal resistance was not statistically significant after decongestion, whereas VAS scoring was. These findings indicate that FESS improves nasal mucosal edema but does not change the structural anatomy of the nose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document