Negative predictive value of provocation tests for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozge Yilmaz Topal ◽  
Kulhas C. Ilknur ◽  
Yagmur T. Irem ◽  
Toyran Muge ◽  
Civelek Ersoy ◽  
...  

Background: After antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are one of the leading drug classes responsible for hypersensitivity reactions in children. The drug provocation test (DPT) is the criterion standard for diagnosis. Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine the negative predictive values (NPV) of DPTs with NSAIDs in pediatric patients and to evaluate their attitudes toward NSAID use after a negative DPT result. Methods: The study included all patients who had undergone DPTs between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, in our pediatric allergy clinic for suspected NSAID hypersensitivity reaction and who had a negative result for the suspected agent. Those patients who could be contacted were asked whether the patient had used the same drug again since the DPT and, if so, whether he or she had a reaction. Patients who were reported to have had a reaction were invited to the clinic for reevaluation. Based on the findings from this retesting, the NPVs of the DPTs with NSAIDs were calculated. Results: During the 5-year study period, DPT results were negative for 230 suspected agents in 215 patients. Of these, 143 patients (66.5%) were able to be contacted. A total of 108 patients (75.5%) had used the tested NSAIDs at least once after the provocation test, and five patients (4.6%) reported a reaction on reexposure. Four of these patients declined reevaluation, one patient exhibited no reaction in a second DPT. Therefore, the NPV was calculated as 96.3% (94.3% for ibuprofen, and 100% for paracetamol). Conclusion: The NPVs of DPTs with NSAIDs, especially of paracetamol DPT, is high in children. This finding should reassure the parents of patients who may require NSAID therapy again.

Author(s):  
Luis Felipe Ensina ◽  
Alex Eustaquio de Lacerda ◽  
Djanira Martins de Andrade ◽  
Ligia Machado ◽  
Inês Camelo-Nunes ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dolly Vanessa Rojas-Mejía ◽  
Diana Lucía Silva Espinosa ◽  
Diana Marcela Martínez ◽  
Luis Fernando Ramírez Zuluaga ◽  
Carlos Daniel Serrano Reyes

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are common. These patients require an effective and safe analgesic alternative. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of the study was to demonstrate the safety of meloxicam and etoricoxib administered by open oral challenge in 2 equal steps in patients with NSAID hypersensitivity. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A cross-sectional, descriptive study of patients with a diagnosis of NSAID hypersensitivity who underwent an oral drug provocation test (DPT) with meloxicam or etoricoxib between January 2011 and August 2017 was conducted. The analysis was performed from a database in BD Clinic. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Two hundred and twenty-eight oral provocations were performed with an alternative NSAID (203 with meloxicam and 25 with etoricoxib) in 217 patients with hypersensitivity to NSAIDs. The median age was 38 years. Ninety-eight percent of meloxicam and 100% of etoricoxib DPTs were performed in 2 steps (without previous placebo), and 52% and 64% of meloxicam and etoricoxib DPTs, respectively, were performed with 50% of the therapeutic dose in each step. Tolerance to meloxicam was demonstrated in 192 patients (94.5%) and in 100% of patients receiving etoricoxib. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Open oral provocation with meloxicam and etoricoxib carried out in 2 steps without placebo seems to be safe and implies less costs and less time expenditure. Also, it could be performed with 2 equal doses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. AB100
Author(s):  
Nathalia Vital ◽  
Caroline Ferreira ◽  
Raissa Roque ◽  
Alex Lacerda ◽  
Chayanne Araujo ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Jeyakumar ◽  
Todd M. Brickman ◽  
Mary E. Williamson ◽  
Keiko Hirose ◽  
Paul Krakovitz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ricardo Natã Fonseca Silva ◽  
Lúcia Coelho Garcia Pereira

Introduction: Third molars are the last teeth to erupt through the oral cavity and in some cases they are congenitally missing, display impaction or remain included. There are many reasons for their removal: decay, lack of space in the dental arch or problems during its eruption. During surgical extraction, oral tissues may be injured, which causes painful symptoms and edema. To combat these surgical complications, it is necessary the use of drugs that fight inflammation, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids. To obtain best results, the combination of NSAIDs and steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used in patients, either as preemptive medication and as postoperative medication. Objective: Performing a literature review in order to determine which drug classes have better postoperative outcomes for pain and swelling in of third molars extraction. Materials and methods: Studies present in SciELO, Lilacs and Pubmed databases published between 2000-2014 were included. Final considerations: Corticosteroids are used preemptively in order to reduce swelling frame, while NSAIDs have greater use in the postoperative period, in an attempt to reduce the pain.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 327-329
Author(s):  
Margitta Worm ◽  
Theresa Hanschmann-Mohn ◽  
Kathrin Scherer Hofmeier ◽  
Victòria Cardona ◽  
Paul Turner ◽  
...  

Abstract Drugs are one of the major causes of anaphylaxis. For example 2346 cases of drug-induced anaphylaxis were reported to the anaphylaxis register as of March 2019. The most common triggers of drug-induced anaphylaxis were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; n = 902) and antibiotics (n = 721). Drug-induced anaphylaxis can be caused by IgE-dependent (e.g., penicillins) and IgE-independent mechanisms. Recently MRG-PX2 has been identified as a receptor for non-IgE-dependent mechanisms. Drug-induced anaphylaxis results more frequently in lethal reactions and is more commonly associated with cardiovascular symptoms. Also therapy refractory anaphylaxis is more frequently triggered by drugs. For the diagnosis of drug-induced anaphylaxis current national and international guidelines should be followed including provocation tests to avoid future reactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document