scholarly journals Respond OJK Regulation Number 55: Can Good Corporate Governance Affect Banks Credit Risk in Indonesia?

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-114
Author(s):  
Siswantoro

Efforts to reduce the number of non-performing loans continue to be carried out, one of which is by enforcing the rules regarding good corporate governance as enshrined in POJK Number 55/POJK.03/2016. The purpose of this study is to respond to these regulations by testing whether the attributes of good corporate governance can influence bank credit risk. The total population is 44 established banking companies with three years from 2017 to 2019. The data analysis technique uses descriptive statistical analysis and partial hypothesis testing. The results showed that the size of the Board of Directors and the size of the Risk Monitoring Committee harmed credit risk. Meanwhile, the size of the Board of Commissioners, the proportion of Independent Commissioners, the meeting of the Board of Commissioners, and the size of the Audit Committee does not significantly influence bank credit risk.

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-120
Author(s):  
Indriyani Indriyani ◽  
Rinda Asytuti

This study aims to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance on Islamic banking financial performance as measured by Return On Assets. The Good Corporate Governance used in this study is the board of commissioners, the board size, audit committee size, sharia supervisory board size, and Islamic social reporting. The population in this study is all Sharia Commercial Banks in Indonesia. The sample used was 9 Islamic commercial banks from 2015-2018. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression test. The results showed that the size of the board of commissioners and ISR partially had a significant negative effect on ROA. While the size of the board of directors, the size of the audit committee and the size of the sharia supervisory board have no significant effect on ROA.


Author(s):  
Jun aidi ◽  
Nurd iono ◽  
Ahmad Rifai ◽  
Icuk Rangga Bawano

This study examines the effect of good corporate governance and sustainability report on company performance. Good corporate governance is dependent on the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent commissioners, the size of the audit committee, institutional ownership, management ownership. Sustainability report is facilitated by economic, environmental and social aspect as well as disclosure index. While Company performance is generated by Return on Assets (ROA). This research was conducted on companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2014-2018. The purposive sampling technique was used. Hypothesis testing was done by linear regression analysis. The results of testing the first variable showed that institutional ownership affects ROA and has a negative relationship direction. While the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent directors, the size of the audit committee, and management ownership have no effect on ROA. However, the result of the second variable showed that the disclosure of economic aspects affects ROA and has a positive relationship direction. While disclosure of environmental and social aspects does not affect ROA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Putri Nurmala ◽  
Akhmad Sigit Adiwibowo

<em>Bond ratings are a scale of risk of all bonds traded, which indicates how safe a bond is. The security of a bond is indicated by its ability to pay interest and repay the loan principal. The purpose of this study is to find out empirical evidence that good corporate governance has an effect on bond ratings. This study uses secondary data. The population in this study are non-financial companies listed on the IDX in 2014-2018. The research sample was selected using purposive sampling method. After subtraction with several criteria, as many as 20 companies were set as the sample. The analysis technique in this study uses multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that institutional ownership and audit committee have a significant effect on bond ratings. Meanwhile, the independent board of commissioners has no significant effect on bond ratings</em>


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Mira Diyanty ◽  
Meina Wulansari Yusniar

<em><span lang="EN-US">The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of the Good Corporate Governance mechanism on the board of commissioners, the board of directors, the proportion of independent commissioners, the audit committee, CAR on ROA. This study also uses a purposive sampling method for sampling. The analysis test used is multiple linear regression analysis. The population used by companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2011 - 2013 and which meet the sample selection criteria. The sample used was 25 companies. Data is collected through secondary data collection in the form of the company's annual report for the period 2011 - 2013 which is published on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The research hypothesis was tested by multiple linear regression which had met the testing of classical assumptions. The results of the analysis show that the board of commissioners, the proportion of independent commissioners, audit committees, CAR does not significantly influence ROA while the board of directors has a positive and significant effect on ROA.</span></em>


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Ahmad Azmy, Dea Restiya Anggreini, Mohammad Hamim

This study aims to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on company profitability. The dependent variable are Return On Assets (ROA) and Return On Equity (ROE). The independent variable are Good Corporate Governance (GCG) represented by the Board of Commissioners, the Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee. This study uses secondary data from audited financial statements of Real Estate and Property companies in 2013-2017. The analytical tool used in this study uses panel data regression. Based on the results of the study it is known that the Board of Directors and Audit Committee variables have a significant positive effect on ROA and ROE. The Board of Commissioners variable has no influence and negative relationship to ROA and ROE.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-287
Author(s):  
Desi Pipian Pujakusum

This study aims to examine the effect of good corporate governance mechanism on the financial performance of banking companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange 2012-2016 period. The corporate governance mechanism is proxied by the size of the board of directors, the size of the board of commissioners, audit committee size, the board of director's education, and the board of commissioner’s education. The company's financial performance is proxied by return on assets (ROA). Samples were taken by using purposive sampling. The total number of samples used in this study amounted to 180 research samples. This study was tested with SPSS 20 program. Data analysis technique used in this research is simple regression analysis.  The results showed that the size of the board of directors, the size of the board of commissioners, and audit comitee size have a significant effect on return on assets. These three factors have a significant effect on return on assets, while the board of commissioners education and the board of director's education have no significant effect on return on assets.


Author(s):  
Ifadatul Musdalifah ◽  
Risdiana Himmati

This research is motivated by the fact that the ROA of Regional Development Banks in 2015-2019 fluctuated, this shows that there are factors that influence it, one of which is Good Corporate Governance. By implementing Good Corporate Governance and supported by the mechanism will improve banking performance. Banking performance is influenced by the size of the Board of Commissioners, the size of the Board of Directors, the size of the Audit Committee, and the size of the company. The formulation of the problem in this study is how do the size of the board of commissioners, the size of the board of directors, the size of the audit committee, and the size of the company affect banking performance at the regional development banks of Indonesia in 2015-2020?. By using a quantitative approach and the type of secondary data as well as the number of samples of 12 banks were taken using the purposive sampling technique. Data processing using E-Views10 with panel data regression analysis techniques. The results of this study are partially the size of the Board of Commissioners, the size of the Board of Directors, and the size of the company have no significant effect on banking performance. Meanwhile, the size of the Audit Committee has a negative and significant effect on banking performance. Simultaneously the size of the Board of Commissioners, the size of the Board of Directors, the size of the Audit Committee, and the size of the company have a significant effect on banking performance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Ni Made Dwi Ratna Sari ◽  
I Gusti Ayu Agung Omika Dewi

The Influence of Carbon Credit, Firm Size, and Good Corporate Governance on Performance of Public Listed Manufacturing Companies. This study aims to examine the effect of carbon credit, firm size, board of commissioners and audit committee on company performance. The population used in this study is manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The method of sample selection is purposive sampling. Only 25 companies meet the criteria. The hypotheses in this study were tested using t test and f test. The data analysis technique used in this study was multiple linear regression test. The results of the study indicate that carbon credit, firm size, board of commissioners and audit committee partially and simultaneously influence performance of public listed manufacturing companies.Keyword: Carbon credit, firm size, board of commisioners, audit committee


2021 ◽  
pp. 220-225
Author(s):  
Jova Yolanda ◽  
Dian Efriyenti

Earnings management practice is the decision to choose a particular accounting method that can achieve the goal of increasing reported profits or reducing investment losses. Misappropriation of financial statements by management can affect the amount of reported income. This study aims to determine whether ownership structure and good corporate governance have a significant influence on earnings management. The study was conducted on pharmaceutical sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in a row for the 2016-2020 period. The sample technique used is purposive sampling, so as many as 7 samples of companies are used. The data testing method uses multiple linear analysis. The results of the data test show that partially institutional ownership has a negative and significant effect on earnings management, independent commissioners, the audit committee, and the board of directors has a negative but not significant effect on earnings management. Simultaneously the results state that institutional ownership, independent commissioners, audit committees, and the board of directors have an effect but not significantly on earnings management.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Robi Ridhayatul Gaos ◽  
Rina Mudjiyanti

This study aims to find empirical evidence of the influence of corporate governance and firm size on financial distress. The sample used in this study is a banking company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) for the 2017-2019 period. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling and obtained a sample of 40 samples that met the criteria. The data analysis technique used is multiple regression analysis. The financial distress criteria in this study measured using the Z-score in Altman's financial distress prediction model. Based on the study results, it can be concluded that managerial ownership, the board of commissioners, and the audit committee have no effect on financial distress, while the board of directors has a positive and significant effect on financial distress and firm size has a negative and significant effect on financial distress.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document