scholarly journals The Influence of the Size of the Board of Commissioners, Size of the Board of Directors, Size of the Audit Committee, and Company Size on Banking Performance at Indonesian Regional Development Banks in 2015-2020

Author(s):  
Ifadatul Musdalifah ◽  
Risdiana Himmati

This research is motivated by the fact that the ROA of Regional Development Banks in 2015-2019 fluctuated, this shows that there are factors that influence it, one of which is Good Corporate Governance. By implementing Good Corporate Governance and supported by the mechanism will improve banking performance. Banking performance is influenced by the size of the Board of Commissioners, the size of the Board of Directors, the size of the Audit Committee, and the size of the company. The formulation of the problem in this study is how do the size of the board of commissioners, the size of the board of directors, the size of the audit committee, and the size of the company affect banking performance at the regional development banks of Indonesia in 2015-2020?. By using a quantitative approach and the type of secondary data as well as the number of samples of 12 banks were taken using the purposive sampling technique. Data processing using E-Views10 with panel data regression analysis techniques. The results of this study are partially the size of the Board of Commissioners, the size of the Board of Directors, and the size of the company have no significant effect on banking performance. Meanwhile, the size of the Audit Committee has a negative and significant effect on banking performance. Simultaneously the size of the Board of Commissioners, the size of the Board of Directors, the size of the Audit Committee, and the size of the company have a significant effect on banking performance.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-48
Author(s):  
Sutri Handayani

This study aimed to find out the effect of Good Corporate Governance toward profitability of listed manufacturer companies in Indonesian stock exchange in 2012-2016 periods. The proxies of Good corporate governance are board of commissioners, board of directors, and audit committee. Moreover, the profitability is measured by Return On Equity (ROE). Population in this study were  registered manufacturer companies in Indonesian stock exchange in 2012-2016 periods. The sampling technique is purposive sampling method. Based on this method, it is obtained 29 companies. The type of data is secondary data. The data processing uses SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) v.20. The data analysis technique used multiple linear regressions. The result of this study showed  that partially, the Board of Commissioners and the Audit Committee have no significant effect on profitability while the Board of Directors has a significant influence on profitability. Simultaneously the Board of Commissioners, the Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee had a significant influence on profitability.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Ahmad Azmy, Dea Restiya Anggreini, Mohammad Hamim

This study aims to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on company profitability. The dependent variable are Return On Assets (ROA) and Return On Equity (ROE). The independent variable are Good Corporate Governance (GCG) represented by the Board of Commissioners, the Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee. This study uses secondary data from audited financial statements of Real Estate and Property companies in 2013-2017. The analytical tool used in this study uses panel data regression. Based on the results of the study it is known that the Board of Directors and Audit Committee variables have a significant positive effect on ROA and ROE. The Board of Commissioners variable has no influence and negative relationship to ROA and ROE.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Wiwin Indah Sari ◽  
Haifah Haifah ◽  
Wiwik Fitria Ningsih

This study aims to analyze the effect of good corporate governance and profitability on firm value in National Private Foreign Exchange Banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2015-2019 period. Good corporate governance variable is proxied by the board of commissioners, board of directors, and audit committee, while profitability is proxied by net profit margin (NPM). The research sample was selected based on purposive sampling technique, so as to obtain a sample of 14 national foreign exchange private banks. The analytical method used is multiple regression analysi­s. The results showed that partially the board of commissioners, board of directors, audit committee, and profitability had no significant effect on firm value. Simultaneously, all the independent variables, namely the board of commissioners, the board of directors, the audit committee, and profitability have a significant effect on firm value.


Author(s):  
Jun aidi ◽  
Nurd iono ◽  
Ahmad Rifai ◽  
Icuk Rangga Bawano

This study examines the effect of good corporate governance and sustainability report on company performance. Good corporate governance is dependent on the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent commissioners, the size of the audit committee, institutional ownership, management ownership. Sustainability report is facilitated by economic, environmental and social aspect as well as disclosure index. While Company performance is generated by Return on Assets (ROA). This research was conducted on companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2014-2018. The purposive sampling technique was used. Hypothesis testing was done by linear regression analysis. The results of testing the first variable showed that institutional ownership affects ROA and has a negative relationship direction. While the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent directors, the size of the audit committee, and management ownership have no effect on ROA. However, the result of the second variable showed that the disclosure of economic aspects affects ROA and has a positive relationship direction. While disclosure of environmental and social aspects does not affect ROA.


Author(s):  
Yugi Maheswari ES ◽  
Iwan Fakhruddin ◽  
Azmi Fitriati ◽  
Bima Cinintya Pratama

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) yang diproksikan oleh dewan direksi, dewan komisaris independen, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, dan dewan pengawas syariah terhadap risiko pembayaran yang diukur dengan rasio Non Performing Financing (NPF) pada Bank Umum Syariah. Populasi penelitian adalah Bank Umum Syariah Yang Terdaftar di Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder berupa laporan tahunan Bank Umum Syariah periode 2015-2019. Sampel yang dikumpulkan adalah 14 bank syariah sebayak 70 data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dewan direksi berpengaruh negative erhadap NPF. Dewan komisaris independen, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, dan dewan pengawas syariah tidak berpengaruh terhadap NPF.  The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) which is proxied by the board of directors, the board of independent commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and the sharia supervisory board against payment risk as measured by the Non Performing Financing (NPF) ratio at the Bank Sharia General. The study population was a Sharia Commercial Bank Registered at Financial services Authority. The data used was secondary data in the form of reports annual Sharia Commercial Bank for the period 2015-2019. The samples collected were 14 Islamic banks as much as 70 data. The results showed that the board of directors has a negative effect on NPF. Independent board of commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and sharia supervisory board have no effect on NPF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Mira Diyanty ◽  
Meina Wulansari Yusniar

<em><span lang="EN-US">The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of the Good Corporate Governance mechanism on the board of commissioners, the board of directors, the proportion of independent commissioners, the audit committee, CAR on ROA. This study also uses a purposive sampling method for sampling. The analysis test used is multiple linear regression analysis. The population used by companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2011 - 2013 and which meet the sample selection criteria. The sample used was 25 companies. Data is collected through secondary data collection in the form of the company's annual report for the period 2011 - 2013 which is published on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The research hypothesis was tested by multiple linear regression which had met the testing of classical assumptions. The results of the analysis show that the board of commissioners, the proportion of independent commissioners, audit committees, CAR does not significantly influence ROA while the board of directors has a positive and significant effect on ROA.</span></em>


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-287
Author(s):  
Desi Pipian Pujakusum

This study aims to examine the effect of good corporate governance mechanism on the financial performance of banking companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange 2012-2016 period. The corporate governance mechanism is proxied by the size of the board of directors, the size of the board of commissioners, audit committee size, the board of director's education, and the board of commissioner’s education. The company's financial performance is proxied by return on assets (ROA). Samples were taken by using purposive sampling. The total number of samples used in this study amounted to 180 research samples. This study was tested with SPSS 20 program. Data analysis technique used in this research is simple regression analysis.  The results showed that the size of the board of directors, the size of the board of commissioners, and audit comitee size have a significant effect on return on assets. These three factors have a significant effect on return on assets, while the board of commissioners education and the board of director's education have no significant effect on return on assets.


2021 ◽  
pp. 220-225
Author(s):  
Jova Yolanda ◽  
Dian Efriyenti

Earnings management practice is the decision to choose a particular accounting method that can achieve the goal of increasing reported profits or reducing investment losses. Misappropriation of financial statements by management can affect the amount of reported income. This study aims to determine whether ownership structure and good corporate governance have a significant influence on earnings management. The study was conducted on pharmaceutical sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in a row for the 2016-2020 period. The sample technique used is purposive sampling, so as many as 7 samples of companies are used. The data testing method uses multiple linear analysis. The results of the data test show that partially institutional ownership has a negative and significant effect on earnings management, independent commissioners, the audit committee, and the board of directors has a negative but not significant effect on earnings management. Simultaneously the results state that institutional ownership, independent commissioners, audit committees, and the board of directors have an effect but not significantly on earnings management.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1453
Author(s):  
Yelsa Yulia Efwita ◽  
Erinos NR

The purpose of the research is to know the corporate governance that is proxied by the board of commissioners, the effectiveness of the audit committee and the board of directors on the selection of external auditors. This study uses secondary data from the company's annual report for 2015-2017. The sampling method in this study used purposive sampling with a sample of 67 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-217. The analysis used in this study is logistic regression analysis. The results showed that the board of commissioners, the effectiveness of the audit committee had a significant positive effect on the selection of external auditors, while the board of directors did not influence the selection of quality external auditors.Keywords: auditor selection, big four, board of commissioners, board of directors


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document