scholarly journals A Retrospective Analysis of Early Death after Admission in Advanced Cancer Patients at the End-of-life in Single-institution

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 747-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuo Hori ◽  
Shuji Hiramoto ◽  
Ayako Kikuchi ◽  
Akira Yoshioka ◽  
Tomoko Tamaki
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Single Institution

Antibiotic use during end of life in patients with advanced malignancy: A retrospective analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24002-e24002
Author(s):  
Shamali Poojary ◽  
Jayita Deodhar ◽  
Akanksha Chodankar ◽  
Anuja Damani ◽  
Arunangshu Ghoshal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Oral Antibiotic ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Malignancy

e24002 Background: Patients with advanced malignancy have complex symptoms towards end of life. Some of these symptoms include febrile illness and infections. Benefits of treating infection and fever with antibiotics should be weighed out with goals of care for these patients. This study aims to understand the frequency of use of antibiotics and its association with symptom control in the last two weeks of life in advanced cancer patients on best supportive care. Methods: This is an observational retrospective analysis of medical records maintained for advanced cancer patients who have been enrolled in home-based palliative care services. 8 months data was analyzed. Sociodemographic variables, cancer diagnoses, symptoms, use and type of antibiotics prescribed were noted. Relevant statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS v 25. Results: Of 256 patients included in the analysis, 133 (52%) were male. 57 (22.3% ) patients had gastrointestinal (GI) cancer and 45 ( 17.6%) had lung cancer. 175 (68.4)% died at home and 50 (19.5%) in hospital. 9 (3.1 %) patients had fever. 10 (3.9%) patient had respiratory, and 18 (7%) had gastrointestinal symptoms, respectively. Other symptoms noted were wound infection (10,3.9%), skin and soft tissue (5,2%). Other symptoms noted were wound infection (10,3.9%), skin and soft tissue (5,2%). Only 2 patients had urinary tract symptom. 49 (19.1%) patients had received antibiotics in their last two weeks of life. Intravenous (IV) route of administration was slightly higher than oral (28 vs 21 patients).More than half the patients received 2 antibiotics. Amoxicillin/clavulanate was the most common oral antibiotic and Cefoperazone/ sulbactam was the most common IV antibiotic. Symptom relief was noted in 9 patients (18.4%) however it was statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusions: Of 256 patients included in the study, 19% had received antibiotics in last two week of their life. Use of intravenous route for antibiotic administration was more than oral route. Gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms were common cause for antibiotic prescription. Symptomatic benefit was noted with antibiotics use in these patients. Judicious use of antibiotics during end of life care should be considered.

A picture of early death after admission in patients with advanced cancer at the end-of-life.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 80-80
Author(s):  
Shuji Hiramoto ◽  
Ayako Kikuchi ◽  
Hori Tetsuo ◽  
Akira Yoshioka ◽  
Tomoko Tamaki
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Site ◽  
Consciousness Level ◽  
Continuous Sedation ◽  
And Performance

80 Background: Little is unknown about a picture of early death after admission in terminal phase of advanced cancer patients. Previous studies have reported that approximately 14.3% of patients with cancer enroll in hospice in the last 3days of life. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for 510 advanced cancer patients at the end of life between August 2011 and August 2016, and contained deceased 83 (16.3%) patients within 3days after admission in our institute. We divided into deceased patients within 3days and more than 4days after admission. Primary endpoints are to compare each symptom (delirium, cancer pain, dyspnea, nausea and vomiting, fatigue) and intervention (hydration, continuous sedation, opioid) at the end of life. Secondary endpoints are association between prognostic factor and early death (within 3days) after admission. Results: Symptoms about delirium, cancer pain, dyspnea, nausea and vomiting were no significant difference between deceased patients within 3days and more than 4days after admission. Mean hydration at the end of life was more significantly volume of infusion for patients in within 3days (0.34 Litters/day) than in over 4 days (0.20 Litters/day). Continuous sedation was significantly less for patients within 3days (4.82%) than in over 4 days (28.64%). Mean of opioid use was significantly less for patients within 3days (Oral morphine dose 23.54mg/day) than in over 4 days (41.11mg/day). In univariate analysis primary site of cancer was tend to (p = 0.086), and number of metastatic site (p = 0.018) and consciousness level ( < 0.0001) and performance status ( < 0.0001) were significantly associated with early death. In multivariate analysis number of metastatic site (p = 0.057) and consciousness level ( < 0.0001) and performance status (p = 0.0004) were significantly associated with early death. Conclusions: We reports a picture of early death after admission in advanced cancer patients at the end-of-life, and number of metastatic site and consciousness level and performance status might be predictors for short-term prediction model.

Time Perception of Cancer Patients Without Evidence of Disease and Advanced Cancer Patients in a Palliative, End-of-Life-Care Setting

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven ◽  
Johannes Schilderman ◽  
Constans A. H. H. V. M. Verhagen ◽  
Judith B. Prins
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Time Perception ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Shifting Palliative Care Paradigm in Primary Care From Better Death to Better End-of-Life : A Swiss Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Sommer ◽  
Christopher Chung ◽  
Dagmar M. Haller ◽  
Sophie Pautex
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: Patients suffering from advanced cancer often loose contact with their primary care physician (PCP) during oncologic treatment and palliative care is introduced very late.The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and procedures for a randomized trial of an intervention to teach PCPs a palliative care approach and communication skills to improve advanced cancer patients’ quality of life. Methods: Observational pilot study in 5 steps. 1) Recruitment of PCPs. 2) Intervention: training on palliative care competencies and communication skills addressing end-of-life issues.3) Recruitment of advanced cancer patients by PCPs. 4) Patients follow-up by PCPs, and assessment of their quality of life by a research assistant 5) Feedback from PCPs using a semi-structured focus group and three individual interviews with qualitative deductive theme analysis.Results: 8 PCPs were trained. PCPs failed to recruit patients for fear of imposing additional loads on their patients. PCPs changed their approach of advanced cancer patients. They became more conscious of their role and responsibility during oncologic treatments and felt empowered to take a more active role picking up patient’s cues and addressing advance directives. They developed interprofessional collaborations for advance care planning. Overall, they discovered the role to help patients to make decisions for a better end-of-life.Conclusions: PCPs failed to recruit advanced cancer patients, but reported a change in paradigm about palliative care. They moved from a focus on helping patients to die better, to a new role helping patients to define the conditions for a better end-of-life.Trial registration : The ethics committee of the canton of Geneva approved the study (2018-00077 Pilot Study) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki

An early palliative care intervention can be confronting but reassuring: A qualitative study on the experiences of patients with advanced cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 783-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Fliedner ◽  
Sofia Zambrano ◽  
Jos MGA Schols ◽  
Marie Bakitas ◽  
Christa Lohrmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
End Of Life Decisions ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Network Support ◽  
Care Intervention ◽  
Life Decisions

Background: Intervention trials confirm that patients with advanced cancer receiving early palliative care experience a better quality of life and show improved knowledge about and use of palliative care services. To involve patients in future health-care decisions, health professionals should understand patients’ perspectives. However, little is known about how patients’ experience such interventions. Aim: To explore advanced cancer patients’ experiences with a structured early palliative care intervention, its acceptability and impact on the patients’ life including influencing factors. Design: Qualitative content analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Setting/participants: Patients with various advanced cancer diagnoses were enrolled in a multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT01983956), which investigated the impact of “Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support,” a structured early palliative care intervention, on distress. Of these, 20 patients who underwent the intervention participated in this study. Results: Participants received the intervention well and gained a better understanding of their personal situation. Patients reported that the intervention can feel “confronting” but with the right timing it can be confirming and facilitate family conversations. Patients’ personal background and the intervention timing within their personal disease trajectory influenced their emotional and cognitive experiences; it also impacted their understanding of palliative care and triggered actions toward future care planning. Conclusion: Early palliative care interventions like “Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support” may provoke emotions and feel “confrontational” often because this is the first time when issues about one’s end of life are openly discussed; yet, advanced cancer patients found it beneficial and felt it should be incorporated into routine care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document