Endocrine Treatment of Breast Cancer: Current Perspectives, Future Directions

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tazia Irfan ◽  
Mainul Haque ◽  
Sayeeda Rahman ◽  
Russell Kabir ◽  
Nuzhat Rahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Effective Control ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
Estrogen Production ◽  
Hormone Sensitive

Breast cancer remains one of the major causes of death in women, and endocrine treatment is currently one of the mainstay of treatment in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Endocrine therapy either slows down or stops the growth of hormone-sensitive tumors by blocking the body’s capability to yield hormones or by interfering with hormone action. In this paper, we intended to review various approaches of endocrine treatments for breast cancer highlighting successes and limitations. There are three settings where endocrine treatment of breast cancer can be used: neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or metastatic. Several strategies have also been developed to treat hormone-sensitive breast cancer which include ovarian ablation, blocking estrogen production, and stopping estrogen effects. Selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs) (e.g. tamoxifen and raloxifene), aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (e.g. anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane), gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH) (e.g. goserelin), and selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs) (e.g. fulvestrant) are currently used drugs to treat breast cancer. Tamoxifen is probably the first targeted therapy widely used in breast cancer treatment which is considered to be very effective as first line endocrine treatment in previously untreated patients and also can be used after other endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. AIs inhibit the action of enzyme aromatase which ultimately decrease the production of estrogen to stimulate the growth of ER+ breast cancer cells. GnRH agonists suppress ovarian function, inducing artificial menopause in premenopausal women. Endocrine treatments are cheap, well-tolerated and have a fixed single daily dose for all ages, heights and weights of patients. Endocrine treatments are not nearly as toxic as chemotherapy and frequent hospitalization can be avoided. New drugs in preliminary trials demonstrated the potential for improvement of the efficacy of endocrine therapy including overcoming resistance. However, the overall goals for breast cancer including endocrine therapy should focus on effective control of cancer, design personalized medical therapeutic approach, increase survival time and quality of life, and improve supportive and palliative care for end-stage disease.

scholarly journals The Modern Landscape of Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women with Breast Cancer

Breast Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 312-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Rossi ◽  
Olivia Pagani
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Ovarian Function Suppression

The optimal endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with early and advanced breast cancer still remains an important and controversial issue. For over 30 years, tamoxifen has been the gold standard in the adjuvant setting. New therapeutic options, such as the addition of ovarian function suppression to oral endocrine therapy (either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors), can improve outcomes over tamoxifen alone in well-selected patients. Treatment duration has also been revisited, and extended therapy is becoming a new standard of care, especially in high-risk patients. Endocrine therapy for advanced disease still represents a challenge and a research priority. New drugs and combinations able to overcome endocrine resistance are at the horizon, and their role in premenopausal women should be better elucidated. Side effects and quality of life (including family planning considerations) play an important role in treatment selection and in the patients' treatment adherence and should always be discussed before start of treatment. The paper will specifically focus on how to integrate all new treatment options in the current armamentarium of endocrine therapy of premenopausal women, with the aim of best fine-tuning treatment selections according to the individual risk/benefit evaluation.

Evaluation of Adjuvant! Online to predict the effect of optimal endocrine therapy (ovarian function suppression plus tamoxifen) for premenopausal breast cancer patients with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 585-585
Author(s):  
R. J. Paridaens ◽  
S. Gelber ◽  
B. F. Cole ◽  
R. D. Gelber ◽  
B. Thürlimann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Ovarian Function Suppression ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Positive ◽  
Chemoendocrine Therapy ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

585 Background: Adjuvant! Online (AOL) is a user-friendly, web-based tool that provides estimates of adjuvant therapy outcomes for individual patients. While reliable evidence underpins estimates for most patient cohorts, there is a paucity of data on the effect of adding chemotherapy to complete estrogen blockade for premenopausal women with estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer. Methods: International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial 11–93 enrolled 174 premenopausal women with estrogen-receptor positive, node-positive breast cancer from 1993 to 1998. Fifty percent of patients had 1 positive axillary lymph node and 97% had between 1 and 3 positive nodes. Patients were randomized to receive ovarian function suppression plus five years of tamoxifen with or without chemotherapy. The estimated hazard rates and corresponding 10-year relapse-free survival percents obtained from Trial 11–93 data (Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;113:137–144) were compared with those predicted using AOL. Results: The 10-year relapse-free survival percents predicted from AOL were 64.4% (95% CI, 61.9% to 67.2%) for endocrine therapy alone and 74.9% (95% CI, 73.1% to 76.8%) for chemoendocrine therapy. By contrast, these estimates in Trial 11–93 were 76.4% (95% CI, 65.8% to 84.0%) for endocrine therapy alone and 74.9% (95% CI, 64.5% to 82.7%) for chemoendocrine therapy. The AOL estimate for the endocrine alone control group is lower than that observed in Trial 11–93 (p = 0.03), while the estimates for the two chemoendocrine therapy groups are similar. Conclusions: AOL appears to underestimate the effectiveness of adjuvant endocrine therapy alone for premenopausal women with endocrine responsive breast cancer, thus overestimating the added benefit - if any - from chemotherapy for this patient population. Prospective clinical trials addressing the question are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Optimal Management of the Premenopausal Patient with Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer

2014 ◽  
pp. e12-e15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksander Chojecki ◽  
Serena Wong ◽  
Deborah Toppmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Sole Source ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Positive ◽  
Function Interpretation

Tamoxifen is the standard of care in the adjuvant treatment of premenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer. Ovarian suppression (OS) is another method of endocrine therapy and has been shown to decrease the risk of recurrence and confer a survival advantage when used as the sole source of hormone therapy. However, there is no evidence that OS is superior to treatment with tamoxifen. Studies comparing OS with or without tamoxifen compared with chemotherapy have demonstrated comparable effects. There does not appear to be any additional benefit when OS is combined with chemotherapy, although there is a suggestion that there may be an effect in the subgroup of young women (aged younger than 40 years) who are least likely to experience chemotherapy-induced cessation of ovarian function. Interpretation of existing data is hampered by the lack of studies incorporating modern chemotherapy regimens and the absence of molecular analyses that would allow us to better define populations most likely to benefit from endocrine therapy. Last, the role of aromatase inhibitors (AI) in the premenopausal setting remains undefined. Two recent studies, SOFT and TEXT, aim to shed light on the effect of OS and AI in premenopausal ER+ breast cancer and are pending analysis.

Zoledronic Acid Prevents Cancer Treatment–Induced Bone Loss in Premenopausal Women Receiving Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer: A Report From the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 820-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F.X. Gnant ◽  
Brigitte Mlineritsch ◽  
Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth ◽  
Stephan Grampp ◽  
Helmut Kaessmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
T Score

Purpose Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer can be associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) that may lead to skeletal morbidity. This study examined whether zoledronic acid can prevent bone loss associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients. Patients and Methods This study is a randomized, open-label, phase III, four-arm trial comparing tamoxifen (20 mg/d orally) and goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days subcutaneously) ± zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously every 6 months) versus anastrozole (1 mg/d orally) and goserelin ± zoledronic acid for 3 years in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive breast cancer. In a BMD subprotocol at three trial centers, patients underwent serial BMD measurements at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Results Four hundred one patients were included in the BMD subprotocol. Endocrine treatment without zoledronic acid led to significant (P < .001) overall bone loss after 3 years of treatment (BMD, −14.4% after 36 months; mean T score reduction, −1.4). Overall bone loss was significantly more severe in patients receiving anastrozole/goserelin (BMD, −17.3%; mean T score reduction, −2.6) compared with patients receiving tamoxifen/goserelin (BMD, −11.6%; mean T score reduction, −1.1). In contrast, BMD remained stable in zoledronic acid–treated patients (P < .0001 compared with endocrine therapy alone). No interactions with age or other risk factors were noted. Conclusion Endocrine therapy caused significant bone loss that increased with treatment duration in premenopausal women with breast cancer. Zoledronic acid 4 mg every 6 months effectively inhibited bone loss. Regular BMD measurements and initiation of concomitant bisphosphonate therapy on evidence of bone loss should be considered for patients undergoing endocrine therapy.

scholarly journals Optimal Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women: A Pragmatic Approach to Unanswered Questions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tal Sella ◽  
Kathryn J. Ruddy ◽  
Lisa A. Carey ◽  
Ann H. Partridge
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Ovarian Function Suppression ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Disease Biology ◽  
Age Related

Recent epidemiologic data show an increasing incidence of breast cancer among premenopausal women in many higher-income countries. Among premenopausal women, those diagnosed under age 40 years experience inferior long-term outcomes, particularly in the setting of hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative disease. In addition to more advanced disease presentation and/or less favorable disease biology, suboptimal adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) has emerged as an important driver of this age-related disparity. Historically, young women have been excluded from treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs), attained low rates of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea, and exhibited low adherence to ET. Recently, several studies have demonstrated treatment with ovarian function suppression (OFS) during the first 5 years postdiagnosis to be associated with improvements in breast cancer recurrence and mortality, with additional benefits achieved from pairing OFS with an AI. As the first 5 years of ET for premenopausal women has been transformed, extended ET, administered in years 5-10 postdiagnosis, has also become more common. However, the only studies of extending ET in premenopausal women have tested an additional 5 years of tamoxifen following an initial 5 years of tamoxifen and studies of AIs in the second 5 years have been limited to postmenopausal women. Herein, we review available data concerning potential benefits and risks to be considered when counseling premenopausal women on extended ET, including the continuation of OFS. We offer a pragmatic framework to support decision making given the current body of knowledge and call out the need for additional research into this issue.

Challenges in Treating Premenopausal Women with Endocrine-Sensitive Breast Cancer

2016 ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hatem A. Azim ◽  
Nancy E. Davidson ◽  
Kathryn J. Ruddy
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Sexual Dysfunction ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitor ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Hot Flashes ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Ovarian Function Suppression

For the hundreds of thousands of premenopausal women who are diagnosed annually with endocrine-sensitive breast cancer, treatment strategies are complex. For many, chemotherapy may not be necessary, and endocrine therapy decision making is paramount. Options for adjuvant endocrine regimens include tamoxifen for 5 years, tamoxifen for 10 years, ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus tamoxifen for 5 years, and OFS plus an aromatase inhibitor for 5 years. There are modest differences in efficacy between these regimens, with a benefit from OFS most obvious among patients with higher-risk disease; therefore, choosing which should be used for a given patient requires consideration of expected toxicities and patient preferences. An aromatase inhibitor cannot be safely prescribed without OFS in this setting. Additional research is needed to determine whether genomic tests such as Prosigna and Endopredict can help with decision making about optimal duration of endocrine therapy for premenopausal patients. Endocrine therapy side effects can include hot flashes, sexual dysfunction, osteoporosis, and infertility, all of which may impair quality of life and can encourage nonadherence with treatment. Ovarian function suppression worsens menopausal side effects. Hot flashes tend to be worse with tamoxifen/OFS, whereas sexual dysfunction and osteoporosis tend to be worse with aromatase inhibitors/OFS. Pregnancy is safe after endocrine therapy, and some survivors can conceive naturally. Still, embryo or oocyte cryopreservation should be considered at the time of diagnosis for patients with endocrine-sensitive disease who desire future childbearing, particularly if they will undergo chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Estrogen receptor-α directly regulates the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 pathway associated with antiestrogen response in breast cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (49) ◽  
pp. 15172-15177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Yang ◽  
Alaa AlTahan ◽  
Dylan T. Jones ◽  
Francesca M. Buffa ◽  
Esther Bridges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Breast Cancer Cells ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factor ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Α ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Estrogen Response

A majority of breast cancers are driven by estrogen via estrogen receptor-α (ERα). Our previous studies indicate that hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) cooperates with ERα in breast cancer cells. However, whether ERα is implicated in the direct regulation of HIF-1α and the role of HIF-1α in endocrine therapy response are unknown. In this study we found that a subpopulation of HIF-1α targets, many of them bearing both hypoxia response elements and estrogen response elements, are regulated by ERα in normoxia and hypoxia. Interestingly, the HIF-1α gene itself also bears an estrogen response element, and its expression is directly regulated by ERα. Clinical data revealed that expression of the HIF-1α gene or a hypoxia metagene signature is associated with a poor outcome to endocrine treatment in ERα+ breast cancer. HIF-1α was able to confer endocrine therapy resistance to ERα+ breast cancer cells. Our findings define, for the first time to our knowledge, a direct regulatory pathway between ERα and HIF-1α, which might modulate hormone response in treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document