scholarly journals Religious slaughter: A current controversial animal welfare issue

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 64-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Haluk Anil
Animals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Sánchez-Hidalgo ◽  
Carla Rosenfeld ◽  
Carmen Gallo

The objective of this study was to evaluate the welfare of cull cows in a slaughtering plant, using indicators of health on arrival and indicators of handling during the stunning process. These pre-slaughter indicators were associated with post-slaughter indicators of the same cows, such as carcass bruising and condemnations. Transport staff surveys showed that all drivers had been trained on animal welfare. All loads of cows came directly from farms and had an average transport duration of 5 h 22 min. Indicators were registered in 237 cows during unloading at the slaughterhouse and in the stunning box. Bruises and condemnations were recorded post-slaughter in the carcasses of the same cows. Results at arrival showed that 48% of the cows had low body condition, 50% had mammary problems, and 24% suffered from lameness. During stunning, 16% of cows needed a second shot, and 54% exceeded the 60 s established as a recommended interval between stunning and bleeding. During the post-slaughter evaluation, 50% of the carcasses had more than two bruises and 70.46% had a bruise severity score different from zero. Low body condition was a risk factor to increase the severity of bruises; low body condition and mammary problems increased carcass condemnations; the stunning process indicators were not statistically associated with the severity of the bruises. For cull cows the main animal welfare issue originates at farm level.


2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Flora Sarti Oliveira ◽  
André Oliveira Rossi ◽  
Luana Finocchiaro Romualdo Silva ◽  
Michele Correa Lau ◽  
Rodrigo Egydio Barreto

Science ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 223 (4635) ◽  
pp. 468-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Fox

Author(s):  
Herlina Agustin ◽  
Rinda Aunillah Sirait ◽  
Dandi Supriadi

The management of conflict and negotiation play an important role in solving a dispute. Both actions are not simple tasks in resolving conflicts since different points of view usually involve. This is what happened in the dispute of animal welfare issue between the Bandung Zoo and Scorpion Wildlife Foundation. The dispute that becomes the focus of this article relates to the accusation raised by Scorpion Wildlife towards the Bandung Zoo in terms of animal welfare abandonment. The conflict between the two organizations has increased because the Bandung Zoo did not accept the allegations and intended to bring Scorpion to a legal court under the reason of defamation. This article looks at the utilization of the management of conflict and negotiation to resolve this conflict, being done by the Agency of Natural Resources of West Java as the facilitator. The study used constructivist case study methods in order to chronologically construct the conflict as well as the use of negotiation. The results show that the facilitator has performed its dominance in the negotiation process, while the conflicted parties were still not having an agreement to resolve the problem. This condition has potential to invalidate at any time if the resolution is not completely reached.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document