How prepared are GUM and HIV clinics in London to respond to the Hepatitis A outbreak? A survey of  vaccination policy and logistics.

Author(s):  
Gary Brook
PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e0116939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kassiani Mellou ◽  
Theologia Sideroglou ◽  
Vassiliki Papaevangelou ◽  
Anna Katsiaflaka ◽  
Nikolaos Bitsolas ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 140 (12) ◽  
pp. 2172-2181 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. KURKELA ◽  
R. PEBODY ◽  
G. KAFATOS ◽  
N. ANDREWS ◽  
C. BARBARA ◽  
...  

SUMMARYThe WHO recommends hepatitis A virus (HAV) immunization according to level of transmission and disease burden. We aimed to identify susceptible age groups by standardized serosurveys to inform HAV vaccination policy in participating countries: Belgium, Czech Republic, England, Finland, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Malta, Romania, and Slovakia. Each country tested national serum banks (n = 1854–6748), collected during 1996–2004, for anti-HAV antibodies. Local laboratory results were standardized to common units. Forty-one per cent of those aged <30 years and 6% of those aged ⩾30 years were susceptible to HAV in Romania; compared to 70–94% and 26–71%, respectively, elsewhere. Romania reported high HAV incidence in children and young adults. Other countries reported HAV disease primarily in older risk groups. The results suggest low level of HAV transmission in most of Europe. Romania, however, appeared as an area with intermediate transmission. Vaccination of risk groups in countries with high susceptibility of young and middle-aged adults needs to be continued.


Vaccine X ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 100014 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Plunkett ◽  
Sema Mandal ◽  
Koye Balogun ◽  
Kazim Beebeejaun ◽  
Siew Lin Ngui ◽  
...  

Sexual Health ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 239
Author(s):  
Jia-Juen Lin ◽  
Yuan-Ti Lee ◽  
Hao-Jan Yang

Background Taiwan government has promoted the administration of a hepatitis A vaccine at public expense for high-risk groups as a preventive measure after the outbreak of hepatitis A virus (HAV) infections in 2015. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of such vaccination policy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Methods: From January 2016 to July 2017, we enrolled 658 HIV-positive male participants. Participants were stratified into anti-HAV-positive (n = 165) and anti-HAV-negative (n = 493) groups. A total of 364 anti-HAV-negative patients received vaccination against HAV and were followed up for 1.5 years. A Cox regression model was used to estimate the effects of factors predicting positive anti-HAV detection after vaccination. Results: Patients with HIV had an anti-HAV-positive prevalence of 25.1% before vaccination. Of the 364 patients inoculated with the first dose of vaccine, 58.0% received the second dose. Seroresponse rates were 50.0% and 80.6%, respectively. Antibody production was 30.0% lower in patients with a CD4 T-cell count &lt;200 cells/µL (adjusted relative risk (ARR) = 0.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.5–0.9) compared with those with 500 cells/µL. Hepatitis C co-infection reduced the production of antibodies by 50.0% (ARR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.2–0.8). Conclusion: This study suggests that vaccination against hepatitis A be administered when the immunity of an HIV-positive patient is strong. The promotion of the current vaccination policy against hepatitis A in Taiwan has improved the vaccination rate; the response rate for receiving one dose of the vaccine doubled.


Vaccine ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (17-19) ◽  
pp. 2404-2406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommaso Stroffolini ◽  
Alfonso Mele ◽  
Luciano Sagliocca

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1175-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidhi Ghildayal

Purpose Hepatitis A is a prevalent disease that is largely preventable by vaccine usage. The vaccine for this illness is highly underused in most regions. In an attempt to find the strategies that are most beneficial in regard to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost in current environments, the purpose of this paper is to conduct cost-effectiveness analyses to investigate vaccination strategies in a more economically developed country (MEDC), generally known as a “developed” area: the USA, and a less economically developed country (LEDC), generally known as a “developing” area: the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Design/methodology/approach This study used a dynamic transmission model for comparative effectiveness analyses. The model ran two different scenarios. The two regions studied have different policies and strategies for Hepatitis A vaccination currently, and also used different strategies in 2009. In the USA, a universal vaccination policy was modeled, along with a scenario in which it was removed. In Rio de Janeiro, a no vaccination policy was modeled, along with a scenario in which a universal vaccination policy was effected. Findings The comparison of resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio values to accepted threshold values showed universal vaccination to be cost-effective in both the USA and Rio de Janeiro as compared to no vaccination. When episode and vaccination costs and vaccination efficacy were varied, this still remained true. Universal vaccination was found to result in lower incidence of Hepatitis A in both the USA and Rio de Janeiro. Over the twenty-year time horizon, universal vaccination is projected to prevent 506,945 cases of symptomatic Hepatitis A in the USA and 42,318 cases of Hepatitis A in Rio de Janeiro. Other benefits include a projected increase in cumulative QALYs through the use of universal vaccination. Originality/value This analysis showed universal vaccination to be cost-effective as compared to no vaccination, and portions of the study’s approach had not previously been applied in tandem to investigate Hepatitis A interventions. The results may help foster higher compliance rates for Hepatitis A vaccination and even greater per-person economic benefits of universal vaccination, particularly in the USA. The purpose of this study is also to encourage elevated levels of surveillance on age of infection in developing regions and consistent reevaluation utilizing dynamic transmission models in both the USA and Brazil, as well as other rapidly developing regions, in order to prevent future epidemics and costs associated with the disease.


Vacunas ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Salleras Sanmartí ◽  
M. Buti Ferret ◽  
A. Domínguez García ◽  
E. Navas Alcalá ◽  
J. Batalla Clavell ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document