Baseline characteristics of study on use of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in routine clinical practice in India

Author(s):  
Revanna Manjunatha
2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Dinshaw ◽  
C Chen ◽  
R De Caterina ◽  
W Jiang ◽  
Y.-H Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who initiated vitamin K antagonist (VKA) were at highest risk of stroke and bleeding in the first few months of therapy. Understanding of the temporal trend of clinical events in AF patients on non-VKA oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy should aid therapeutic decisions. Purpose To evaluate the temporal trend of clinical events in AF patients receiving edoxaban in routine clinical practice in the Global ETNA-AF program. Methods Global ETNA-AF is a multicentre, prospective, noninterventional program evaluating the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban in patients from European and Asian countries. Thromboembolic, bleeding and death events were analysed separately for the 1st and 2nd year of the follow-up period, using a time-to-first-event estimation of cumulative incidence and annual rate via Kaplan-Meier method. Results A total of 27,617 patients were included in this analysis, 48.6% from Europe and 51.4% from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Baseline characteristics were consistent with typical AF population in real world studies (Table 1). Approximately 83% of patients received the recommended edoxaban dose. Annualized rates of ischaemic stroke and major bleeding (ISTH) were lower in the 2nd year than in the 1st year: ischaemic stroke 0.59% (95% CI, 0.50–0.70) vs 0.86% (95% CI, 0.75–0.98), p=0.015; major bleeding 0.87% (95% CI, 0.75–1.00) vs 1.15% (95% CI, 1.02–1.29), p=0.036. The trend toward lower rates of ischaemic stroke and major bleeding in the 2nd year was consistent across regions. All-cause mortality increased slightly from the 1st year to the 2nd year, which was not statistically significant and was not driven by cardiovascular (CV) mortality (Table 2). Conclusion In routine clinical practice in the Global ETNA-AF program, major bleeding and ischaemic stroke rates in >27,000 patients on edoxaban therapy declined from 1st year to 2nd year. Further analyses will investigate whether such trend is influenced by selection for healthier patients over time. Longer follow-up is needed to better understand long-term trends. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Daiichi Sankyo Table 1. Baseline characteristics Table 2. Annualised clinical event rates


Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1019-P ◽  
Author(s):  
JOTHYDEV KESAVADEV ◽  
L. SREENIVASA MURTHY ◽  
BANSHI D. SABOO ◽  
SADASIVA RAO YALAMANCHI ◽  
BALAMURUGAN RAMANATHAN ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasu Saini ◽  
Stephanie H Chen ◽  
David J McCarthy ◽  
Marie C Brunet ◽  
Priyank Khandelwal ◽  
...  

Introduction: There is no definitive evidence currently to guide the choice between general anesthesia (GA) over conscious sedation (CS) for patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT). As MT outcomes are highly time-sensitive especially in the early time window, we aim to evaluate work-flow metrics and outcome differences between the two approaches in routine clinical practice at a Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC). Methods: From 2/2015-9/2018, 329 consecutive MT patients were included from a large retrospective CSC database. In late 2017, we implemented a first-choice GA protocol at our CSC from a first choice CS for MT. Baseline characteristics, work-flow metrics and outcomes measures: mRS at discharge, mRS last follow-up (median, IQR 184 days, 37.25-202.5), radiological hemorrhagic conversion (rHT) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) defined as rHT with post-MT (4-24 hours) NIHSS worsening ≥4, were examined. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to compare workflow and outcomes in GA vs. CS patients. Results: 82 (25.2%) patients received GA and 246 (74.8%) received CS. Baseline characteristics show significantly higher baseline HTN (p .043) and posterior circulation strokes (p .02) in GA patients. Compared to CS, patients undergoing GA had significantly longer procedure times 54±35 vs. 37±22min (OR .98, 95%CI .97-.996) but no difference in onset- or door-to-puncture times. Both had similar first pass success ~57% vs. 53% (p .59), number of attempts 1(1-2) vs. 1(1-2) (p .94) and rate of TICI 2b-3 ~87% vs. 84% (p .85). On multivariate regression, there was no significant difference in outcome measures between GA and CS: rHT (OR 1.1, 95%CI .64-1.9), sICH (OR 1.15, 95%CI .41-3.2), mRS at discharge (OR .75, 95%CI .176-3.22) and mRS at last follow-up (OR 1.05, 95%CI .53-2.08). Conclusion: In routine clinical practice, compared to CS, patients who underwent GA for MT had no difference in clinical outcomes, despite longer procedure times.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document