Palliative Care in General Practice, a contradiction in terms? A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Forero
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
General Practice

What Diagnostic Tools Exist for the Early Identification of Palliative Care Patients in General Practice? A systematic Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert I. Walsh ◽  
Geoffrey Mitchell ◽  
Lily Francis ◽  
Mieke L. van Driel
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Diagnostic Tools

scholarly journals General practice palliative care: patient and carer expectations, advance care plans and place of death—a systematic review

2018 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2018-001549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire E Johnson ◽  
Peta McVey ◽  
Joel Jin-On Rhee ◽  
Hugh Senior ◽  
Leanne Monterosso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Place Of Death ◽  
Palliative Care Patient ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Advance Care

Non-invasive ventilation in palliative care: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Diaz de Teran ◽  
Elena Barbagelata ◽  
Catia Cilloniz ◽  
Antonello Nicolini ◽  
Tommaso Perazzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation

A Systematic Review on Barriers to Palliative Care in Oncology

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912098328
Author(s):  
Jyotsana Parajuli ◽  
Judith E. Hupcey
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Intervention Development ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Meta Analyses

The number of people with cancer and the need for palliative care among this population is increasing in the United States. Despite this growing need, several barriers exist to the utilization of palliative care in oncology. The purpose of this study was to synthesize the evidence on the barriers to palliative care utilization in an oncology population. A systematic review of literature was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, and Psych Info databases were used for the literature search. Articles were included if they: 1) focused on cancer, (2) examined and discussed barriers to palliative care, and c) were peer reviewed, published in English, and had an accessible full text. A total of 29 studies (8 quantitative, 18 qualitative, and 3 mixed-methods) were identified and synthesized for this review. The sample size of the included studies ranged from 10 participants to 313 participants. The barriers to palliative care were categorized into barriers related to the patient and family, b) barriers related to providers, and c) barriers related to the healthcare system or policy. The factors identified in this review provide guidance for intervention development to mitigate the existing barriers and facilitate the use palliative care in individuals with cancer.

Animal assisted intervention for oncology and palliative care patients: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 101347
Author(s):  
Karina Diniz Pinto ◽  
Claudia Teresa Vieira de Souza ◽  
Maria de Lourdes Benamor Teixeira ◽  
Maria Isabel Fragoso da Silveira Gouvêa
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Animal Assisted Intervention

The effectiveness of hope-fostering interventions in palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632199472
Author(s):  
Natalia Salamanca-Balen ◽  
Thomas V Merluzzi ◽  
Man Chen
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Medium Effect ◽  
Spiritual Well Being ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Background: The concept of hope is an important theme in chronic illness and palliative care and has been associated with increased psycho-spiritual well-being and quality of life. Psycho-spiritual interventions have been described in this population, but no systematic review of hope-enhancing interventions or hopelessness-reducing interventions has been conducted for persons with palliative care diseases. Aim: To describe and assess the effectiveness of interventions in palliative care that measure hope and/or hopelessness as an outcome. Design: This systematic review and meta-analysis was pre-registered (Prospero ID: CRD42019119956). Data sources: Electronic databases, journals, and references were searched. We used the Cochrane criteria to assess the risk of bias within studies. Results: Thirty-five studies (24 randomized controlled trials, 5 quasi-experimental, 6 pre-post studies) involving a total of 3296 palliative care patients were included. Compared with usual/standard cancer care alone, interventions significantly increased hope levels at a medium effect size ( g = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.28–0.93) but did not significantly reduce hopelessness ( g = −0.08, 95% CI = −0.18 to 0.02). It was found that interventions significantly increase spirituality ( g = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.02–1.37) and decrease depression ( g = −0.29, 95% CI = −0.51 to −0.07), but had no significant effect over anxiety, quality of life, and symptom burden. Overall, quality of evidence across the included studies was rated as low. Conclusions: Evidence suggests that interventions can be effective in increasing hope in palliative care patients.

scholarly journals Palliative care education and its effectiveness: a systematic review

Public Health ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 194 ◽  
pp. 96-108
Author(s):  
W.W. Li ◽  
J. Chhabra ◽  
S. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Education ◽  
Palliative Care Education

scholarly journals Effects of dignity therapy on palliative patients’ family members: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Leonor Grijó ◽  
Carolina Tojal ◽  
Francisca Rego
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Meaning In Life ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Publication Date ◽  
Dignity Therapy ◽  
Bibliographic Search ◽  
Palliative Patients

Abstract Objective Dignity therapy (DT) is a kind of psychotherapy that identifies the main concerns of end-of-life patients that affect their perception of dignity and helps them to find a new meaning in life. Most prior studies on DT analyze outcomes for palliative care patients. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the outcomes of DT in palliative care patients’ family members. Method In June 2020, a bibliographic search was performed using the terms “Dignity Therapy” and “Palliative Care” in the following databases: Cochrane library, TRIP database, PUBMED, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge. Of the 294 articles found, 8 met the selection criteria and were considered in the present study. No articles were excluded based on their publication date. Results Family members generally believe that DT helps them to better prepare the patient's end-of-life and overcome the bereavement phase. The legacy document was considered a source of comfort, and most would recommend DT to other people in their situation. DT is generally considered as important as any other aspect of the patient's treatment. Significance of results There is evidence of the benefits of DT for palliative patients’ family members. However, there are still few studies that evaluate these outcomes. The existing evidence is poorly generalized, and thus, further studies are needed to deeply explore the benefits of this therapy both for patients and their families.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document