scholarly journals I Can't See where I am Going

ti< ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Kevin Greene
Keyword(s):  

bumper sticker

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
Alexandra M Pittman ◽  
Brandi Karisch ◽  
Carla Huston

Abstract The Mississippi Beef Quality Assurance Program (BQA) has been in place since the early 1990s. In 2015, program materials and format were updated to reflect changing needs of clientele. The current program is a combination of in-person presentation with demonstration of tools such as castration equipment, needles, syringes, etc. to supplement the educational materials. Each registered participant receives a manual, tri-fold supplement, cooler, bumper sticker, and certificate upon completion of the certification. After viewing the presentation, participants complete a 14-question exam to test their knowledge of materials important to the BQA program. Upon passing the exam, participants receive certification, which is valid for 3 yr. Certification events are encouraged to include multiple counties, and reach a wide range of producers. In 2015 to 2017, events were specifically scheduled by state coordinators to ensure cattle producers in all areas of the state had the opportunity to attend a nearby program. Events were also held on an as requested basis. At the end of each certification, participants completed an anonymous survey reporting information on demographics and program effectiveness. From 2015 to 2019, there were 1,734 total certifications through 57 BQA programs provided. At these events, 26 states were represented. From Mississippi, 64 of 82 counties were represented. When describing total number of cattle, the majority of producers reported owning 1 to 50 head (46%) while only 3% reported owning over 1000 head. Producers also listed the total number of acres in pasture, where the majority reporting 1 to 100 acres (32%) and 6% reporting over 1000 acres. When asked to rank economic impacts, most (26%) reported an estimated more than $25 per head benefit due to increased production and marketing. In summary, producers had small number of cattle and acres of pasture but reported large economic benefits to the certification.


1992 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 923-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
William DeJong ◽  
Arvo J. Oopik

Residents of a small Vermont town received one of four mail solicitations from a statewide charity drive. In one condition, designed to legitimize small contributions, the recipients were reminded at the end of the written appeal that “even a penny will help.” In a second condition, the recipients were told that they, like other residents of their town, were known to be concerned about others and received a small gift to reinforce that “helper” label, a bumper sticker reading “I Help Out.” In a second labeling condition, the recipients were told they were known to be proud of their state and received a bumper sticker to reinforce that label. Those in a control condition received a customary direct mail solicitation. Analysis showed that labeling potential donors as “helpers” did not substantially increase donations. Legitimizing small contributions tended to lower contributions, although the finding was not statistically significant. Techniques that work in other contexts to increase help-giving or compliance with requests must be applied cautiously in the context of direct mail fund-raising.


1985 ◽  
pp. 189-194
Author(s):  
Alexandre Kimenyi
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
William C. Gibson

It is easy to imagine a new bumper sticker with the following message:“If you think medical research is expensive, try disease.” Specifically in today's context, it might well read:“If you think neurological research is expensive, try the diseases of the nervous system.”That is precisely what we are doing as a country - “trying disease”! Canada spends $36 billion per year on health care, or $700 million per month. Every hour Canada spends $4 million on "health care" and only $16,000 on medical research.


1991 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Claudia A. Martin-Gregg
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 181 (5) ◽  
pp. 719-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasser M. Rusan ◽  
Mark Peifer

You may have seen the bumper sticker “Eve was framed.” Thousands of years of being blamed for original sin and still many wonder, where's the evidence? Today, the tumor suppressor adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) may have the same complaint about accusations of a different type of CIN, chromosome instability. A series of recent papers, including three in this journal, propose that loss of APC function plays an important role in the CIN seen in many colon cancer cells. However, a closer look reveals a complex story that raises more questions than answers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document