scholarly journals Auditing and earnings management in New Zealand

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Nam Hoai Le
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Auditor Independence ◽  
Audit Opinion ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Empirical Results ◽  
Dummy Variable ◽  
Audit Fee ◽  
Client Firm

<p>The research summarised in this thesis focuses on two research issues of particular importance to the New Zealand economy. First, the thesis examines the impact of audit factors on the level of earnings management. Second, the thesis empirically assesses the relationship between the level of earnings management and the audit fees charged by audit firms. In the empirical work summarised in this thesis I use the absolute value of discretionary accruals (DACCs) as a proxy for earnings management. I estimate DACCs for each sample firm by using the modified Jones (1991) model. Moreover, several auditor characteristics have been employed in the thesis as proxies for auditor quality and independence. I use a BIG4 dummy variable (that equals 1 if the auditor is a Big 4 audit firm and 0 otherwise), an AOFFICE dummy variable (that equals 1 if the audit firm’s office is located in Wellington or Auckland and 0 otherwise), an AO dummy variable (that equals 1 if the client firm receives a qualified or conditional audit opinion and 0 otherwise) and a FISCAL dummy variable (that equals 1 if the client firm’s fiscal year-end falls in the period from March to June and 0 otherwise) as proxies for audit quality. I also use a RNAF variable (as measured by the ratio of non-audit fees to total fees paid) and a C_AUDITOR dummy variable (that equals 1 if a client firm changes its audit firm and 0 otherwise) as proxies for auditor independence in relation to the level of DACCs. The empirical results summarised in the thesis show that the level of DACCs is significantly and negatively associated with the BIG4 and AOFFICE variables. This result is consistent with the common perception that higher quality auditors will lead to a higher audit quality and that this in turn will reduce level of DACCs. I also find a positive and statistically significant relationship between the FISCAL variable and the level of DACCs. This result indicates that DACCs are likely to be higher if the audit is conducted during the busy audit season. The empirical results summarised in the thesis also show a positive and significant relationship between the audit opinion (AO) variable and the level of DACCs. This means that a qualified or conditional audit opinion is more likely to occur if the financial statements involve a relatively higher level of DACCs. However, the empirical results summarised in the thesis report an insignificant relationship between the level of DACCs and the C_AUDITOR and RNAF variables. These results mean that auditor independence does not appear to have any impact on the level of DACCs. In part two of this thesis, I examine whether the level of DACCs in the current year is associated with the level of the audit fee in the next ensuing year. Here it is well known that each year the auditor will review both the general and specific factors affecting their audit responsibilities in relation to a particular audit client. Hence, the agreed audit fee for the next ensuing year is likely to reflect information about the level of earnings management in prior years and of how the issues arising out of these earnings management procedures have been resolved between the client firm and the audit firm. In order to test this hypotheses, I employ the audit fee model of Simunic (1980) as refined by Choi et al. (2009), Francis and Simon (1987), Hay et al. (2006b) and Menon and Williams (2001). As expected, the second set of empirical results summarised in the thesis show a positive and statistically significant relationship between the level of DACCs in the current year and the level of the audit fee in the next ensuing year. This means that a high level of DACCs in the current year will impact positively on the level of the audit fee in the next ensuing year.</p>

scholarly journals Auditing and earnings management in New Zealand

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Nam Hoai Le
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Auditor Independence ◽  
Audit Opinion ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Empirical Results ◽  
Dummy Variable ◽  
Audit Fee ◽  
Client Firm

<p>The research summarised in this thesis focuses on two research issues of particular importance to the New Zealand economy. First, the thesis examines the impact of audit factors on the level of earnings management. Second, the thesis empirically assesses the relationship between the level of earnings management and the audit fees charged by audit firms. In the empirical work summarised in this thesis I use the absolute value of discretionary accruals (DACCs) as a proxy for earnings management. I estimate DACCs for each sample firm by using the modified Jones (1991) model. Moreover, several auditor characteristics have been employed in the thesis as proxies for auditor quality and independence. I use a BIG4 dummy variable (that equals 1 if the auditor is a Big 4 audit firm and 0 otherwise), an AOFFICE dummy variable (that equals 1 if the audit firm’s office is located in Wellington or Auckland and 0 otherwise), an AO dummy variable (that equals 1 if the client firm receives a qualified or conditional audit opinion and 0 otherwise) and a FISCAL dummy variable (that equals 1 if the client firm’s fiscal year-end falls in the period from March to June and 0 otherwise) as proxies for audit quality. I also use a RNAF variable (as measured by the ratio of non-audit fees to total fees paid) and a C_AUDITOR dummy variable (that equals 1 if a client firm changes its audit firm and 0 otherwise) as proxies for auditor independence in relation to the level of DACCs. The empirical results summarised in the thesis show that the level of DACCs is significantly and negatively associated with the BIG4 and AOFFICE variables. This result is consistent with the common perception that higher quality auditors will lead to a higher audit quality and that this in turn will reduce level of DACCs. I also find a positive and statistically significant relationship between the FISCAL variable and the level of DACCs. This result indicates that DACCs are likely to be higher if the audit is conducted during the busy audit season. The empirical results summarised in the thesis also show a positive and significant relationship between the audit opinion (AO) variable and the level of DACCs. This means that a qualified or conditional audit opinion is more likely to occur if the financial statements involve a relatively higher level of DACCs. However, the empirical results summarised in the thesis report an insignificant relationship between the level of DACCs and the C_AUDITOR and RNAF variables. These results mean that auditor independence does not appear to have any impact on the level of DACCs. In part two of this thesis, I examine whether the level of DACCs in the current year is associated with the level of the audit fee in the next ensuing year. Here it is well known that each year the auditor will review both the general and specific factors affecting their audit responsibilities in relation to a particular audit client. Hence, the agreed audit fee for the next ensuing year is likely to reflect information about the level of earnings management in prior years and of how the issues arising out of these earnings management procedures have been resolved between the client firm and the audit firm. In order to test this hypotheses, I employ the audit fee model of Simunic (1980) as refined by Choi et al. (2009), Francis and Simon (1987), Hay et al. (2006b) and Menon and Williams (2001). As expected, the second set of empirical results summarised in the thesis show a positive and statistically significant relationship between the level of DACCs in the current year and the level of the audit fee in the next ensuing year. This means that a high level of DACCs in the current year will impact positively on the level of the audit fee in the next ensuing year.</p>

Fee Discounting and Audit Quality Following Audit Firm and Audit Partner Changes: Chinese Evidence

2014 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 1517-1546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua-Wei Huang ◽  
K Raghunandan ◽  
Ting-Chiao Huang ◽  
Jeng-Ren Chiou
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Audit Fee ◽  
Significant Attention

ABSTRACT Issues related to low-balling of initial year audit fees and the resultant impact on audit quality have received significant attention from regulators in many countries. Using 9,684 observations from China during the years 2002–2011, we find that there is a significant initial year audit fee discount following an audit firm change when both of the signing audit partners are different from the prior year. The evidence is mixed if one or both of the signing partners from the prior year also moves with the client to the new audit firm. We find evidence of audit fee discounting in our analysis of fee levels, but not in our analysis of changes in audit fees from the prior year. Sanctions for problem audits and greater earnings management are more likely when there is an audit firm change that involves two new signing partners together with initial year audit fee discounting.

scholarly journals Does industry expertise at engagement partner and audit firm level matter in emerging market? Evidence from Indonesia

Accounting ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 951-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonius Herusetya ◽  
Meiliana Jaunanda
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Industry Specialization ◽  
Audit Opinion ◽  
Audit Firm

This study investigates the association of industry specialization at the engagement partner level and audit firm level with aggressive earnings management and modified audit opinion. The study employs a sample of 570 firm-year observations of manufacturing industries on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2014 to 2018 using a binary logistic regression model. First, this study finds no evidence of a relationship between industry specialization at the engagement partner level and audit firm level with aggressive discretionary accruals. Furthermore, the author finds evidence of a positive association between industry specialization at the audit firm level and aggressive real earnings management due to high audit quality. Finally, the study finds evidence that industry specialization at audit firm level is likely to issue modified audit opinion. This study contributes to the study of industry specialization at the engagement partner level and audit firm level, which is rarely performed in Indonesia. Policy makers and capital market players might learn some lessons from the audit quality of external auditors with industry specialists as the gatekeeper of the capital market. Moreover, this study has provided a valuable perspective to practitioners, researchers, and policy makers in other emerging markets regarding the quality of industry specialization at the partner and audit firm level.

The Effect of Office Changes within Audit Firms on Clients' Audit Quality and Audit Fees

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-99
Author(s):  
Carl W. Hollingsworth ◽  
Terry L. Neal ◽  
Colin D. Reid
Keyword(s):  
Audit Quality ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Additional Analysis ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Audit Fee ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Audit Partner Rotation

SUMMARY While prior research has examined audit firm and audit partner rotation, we have little evidence on the impact of within-firm engagement team disruptions on the audit. To examine these disruptions, we identify a unique sample of companies where the audit firm issuing office changed but the audit firm did not change and investigate the effect of these changes on the audit. Our results indicate that companies that have a change in their audit firm's issuing office exhibit a decrease in audit quality and an increase in audit fees. In additional analysis, we partition office changes into two groups—client driven changes and audit firm driven changes. This analysis reveals that client driven changes are more likely to result in a higher audit fee while audit quality is unchanged. Conversely, audit firm driven changes do not result in a higher audit fee but do experience a decrease in audit quality.

Leaving a joint audit system: conditional fee reductions

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Holm ◽  
Frank Thinggaard
Keyword(s):  
Audit Quality ◽  
Theory Development ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Audit System ◽  
Interaction Terms ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Audit Fee

Purpose – The authors aim to exploit a natural experiment in which voluntary replace mandatory joint audits for Danish listed companies and analyse audit fee implications of using one or two audit firms. Design/methodology/approach – Regression analysis is used. The authors apply both a core audit fee determinants model and an audit fee change model and include interaction terms. Findings – The authors find short-term fee reductions in companies switching to single audits, but only where the former joint audit contained a dominant auditor. The authors argue that in this situation bargaining power is more with the auditors than in an equally shared joint audit, and that the auditors' incentives to offer an initial fee discount are bigger. Research limitations/implications – The number of observations is constrained by the small Danish capital market. Future research could take a more qualitative research approach, to examine whether the use of a single audit firm rather than two has an effect on audit quality. The area calls for further theory development covering audit fee and audit quality in joint audit settings. Practical implications – Companies should consider their relationship with their auditors before deciding to switch to single auditors. Fee discounts do not seem to reflect long-lasting efficiency gains on the part of the audit firm. Originality/value – Denmark is the first country to leave a mandatory joint audit system, so this is the first time that it is possible to study fee effects related to this.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan Dan Corporate Governance Terhadap Manajemen Laba Di Industri Perbankan Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-120
Author(s):  
Karina Karina ◽  
Sutarti Sutarti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Size Firm

The purpose of this research is to provide empirical evidence of the affect of ownership concetration, firms size, and corporate governance mechanisms on earnings management. Ownership concetration was measure by the biggest stock of individual or organization, firms size was measure by natural logaritma of net assets, and corporate governance mechanisms were measure by three variabels (composition of board of commisioner, audit quality were measure by industry specialize audit firm, and composition of audit committee). Earnings management was measure by discretionary accruals use Modified Jones Method. The population of this research is 41 companies in the banking sector which were listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX). The research data were collected from banking companies financial statement for the period of 2016 to 2018. Based on purposive sampling method. The reseacrh hypotesis were tested using multiple regression analysis. The results of this research show that firm size, firm of commissioner and proportion of commissioner have significant relationships with earnings management. Next, variables composition of board of commissioner, ownership concetration and specialize audit firm have no significant relationship with earnings management. Keywords: ownership concetration, firms size, corporate governance, earnings management

Audit quality and real earnings management: evidence from the UK manufacturing sector

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-181
Author(s):  
R.P. Sitanggang ◽  
Yusuf Karbhari ◽  
Bolaji Tunde Matemilola ◽  
M. Ariff
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Real Earnings Management ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Uk

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether audit quality is associated with real earnings management in the UK. Design/methodology/approach The authors apply the panel fixed effects method that controls for heterogeneity across firms to investigate whether audit quality is related to real earnings management for a large sample of UK manufacturing companies for the period 2010–2013. The authors utilized three proxies to measure real earnings management and two proxies to measure audit quality. Findings The results provide evidence that audit fees are negatively related to abnormal operating cash flows. Conversely, audit fees are positively related to abnormal discretionary expenses. Besides, audit quality proxies show insignificant relationship with abnormal production costs and real earnings management index. Overall, the study finds partial evidence of significant relationship between audit quality and real earnings management. Research limitations/implications These results are important subject to the adequacy of the indicators of real earnings management and audit quality. Like previous research works that mostly focus on upward earnings management, the authors do not address the question of whether and how firms take real actions to manage earnings downwards in certain contexts. Practical implications The findings inform monitoring bodies that the imposition of higher levels of audit quality may result in unintended consequences. Therefore, monitoring bodies, such as audit committees, should consider the implication of imposing higher quality auditing, which may drive firms to potentially value-decreasing real earnings management practices. Managers should curtail real earnings management practices, especially abnormal operating cash flow, because attempt to use higher-quality auditors to mitigate such practice may destroy firm value. Also, managers’ employment may be threatened due to the potential deterioration of firm value caused by using higher-quality auditors to mitigate managers’ real earnings management practices. Moreover, shareholders are informed of the potential detrimental effects of imposing higher levels of audit quality which may lower the value of their investments. Originality/value The paper extends previous research on earnings management in several ways. First, while earlier studies usually use accruals methods to measure earnings management, the authors use the real earnings management approach as managers can switch from accruals to real earnings management when facing more scrutiny from auditors and/or more constrained regulations or standards that may limit their capability to use discretionary accruals. Second, this study reports new findings, as the authors find partial evidence of a significant relationship between audit quality and real earnings management. Third, it is one of the few studies to use a real earnings management index to measure earnings management and its link to audit quality.

The moderating role of audit quality on the relationship between auditor reporting and earnings management: empirical evidence from Tunisia

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fakhfakh Imen ◽  
Jarboui Anis
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Generalized Least Squares ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Audit Opinion ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Audit Opinions ◽  
Auditor Reporting ◽  
The Relationship

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the interrelationship between modified audit opinions and earnings management as measured by discretionary accruals and develop a thorough understanding regarding the moderating effect of audit quality on this relation.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses a sample of Tunisian listed firms on the Tunis Stock Exchange during 2006–2013. Four models are developed and tested by using panel logistic and Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS) regressions.FindingsThe results show that earnings management increases the likelihood of receiving a modified audit opinions. Then firms receiving modified audit opinions manage earnings more than those receiving clean opinions. It is also discovered that audit quality moderates the relationship between audit opinion and earnings management.Practical implicationsThis paper contributes to the literature of both audit and management studies and represents the first effort to examine the relation between audit opinion and earnings management, with audit quality as a moderating variable.Originality/valueThis study extends existing research on earnings management and audit opinion. Thus, this study has the potential to help stakeholders, board of directors, regulators and auditors, who are related with enhancing the supervision of firms and reducing the opportunities given to managers, to engage in earnings management. It constitutes an addition to previous knowledge about audit opinion in the Tunisian context before and after revolution.

Audit quality and earnings management: evidence from Jordan

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebraheem Saleem Salem Alzoubi
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Big 4 ◽  
Jones Model

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to test the association between audit quality and earnings management (EM). Audit quality studies documented that accruals would reduce when the auditor is independent or the audit firm is large. Design/methodology/approach – This paper uses generalised least square regression to investigate the influence of audit quality on EM. The sample contained 86 companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange from 2007 to 2010. The cross-sectional modified Jones model was employed to measure discretionary accruals as a proxy for EM. Findings – This paper revealed that there is a significantly negative association between audit quality and EM. The result inferred that EM level is significantly lower among companies using the services of independent auditors. Moreover, this study exposed that the level of EM is significantly less among companies hiring a Big 4 audit firm, as compared to companies utilising the service of a non-Big 4 audit firm. Research limitations/implications – The measurement error, which is a rigorous concern for studies on EM, is one of the limitations in this study. Hence, the current study wholly inherited the limits of the modified Jones model. Practical implications – The findings based on the current study would provide beneficial information for regulators in Jordan and other countries with an institutional environment similar to that of Jordan. Moreover, the results provided valuable information to investors in assessing the influence of audit quality on financial reporting quality (FRQ). Originality/value – The current study contributed to auditing and corporate governance literature and its influence on EM among Jordanian companies. This research will be of value to companies seeking to reduce EM and enhance FRQ.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document