Food Microbiology Research output through Web of Science: A Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
M. Sankar
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Chun Kuo ◽  
Tsair-Wei Chien ◽  
Willy Chou

UNSTRUCTURED We read with great interest the study by Grammes et al. on research output and international cooperation among countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. The paper is a quantitative study using scientometric analysis instead of a qualitative research using citation analysis. A total of 7,185 publications were extracted from Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) with keywords of “covid19 OR covid-19 OR sarscov2 OR sars-cov-2” as of July 4, 2020. We replicated a citation analysis study to extract abstracts from Pubmed Central(PMC) with similar keywords mentioned above and obtained 35,421 articles relevant to COVID-10 matching their corresponding number of citation in PMC. one hundred top-cited atricles were selected and compared on diagrams. Social network analysis combined with citation numbers in articles was performed to analyze international cooperation among countries. The results were shown on a world map instead of the circle diagram in the previous study. A Sankey diagram was applied to highlight entities(e.g., countries, article types, medical subject headings, and journals) with the most citations. Authors from Chian dominated citations in these 100 top-cited articles rather than the US in publications addressed in the previous study. Both visual representations of the world map and Sankey diagram were provided to readers with a better understanding of the research output and international cooperation among countries during the COVID-19 pandemic


Author(s):  
Tosin Yinka Akintunde ◽  
Taha Hussein Musa ◽  
Hassan Hussein Musa ◽  
Shaojun Chen ◽  
Elhakim Ibrahim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-09
Author(s):  
Mahendra Kumar Patel ◽  
Maya Verma

This study analyses the research output in diabetes literature in India during 2019 indexed on Web of Science database on several aspects includes growth, rank and global publication and share of international collaborative papers. It also analyses the most productive authors, top journals, on-year wise distribution, country wise distribution and authorship pattern of contribution. The highest number of scientific outputs belongs to USA, UK, Netherland, India followed by other countries which considerably had a lower rate of publication. Among all authors globally V. Mohan contributed 75 articles on Diabetes literature. From this study it was concluded that the publication on Diabetes literature was increased and more participation should be needed for the growth of Diabetes literature nationally throughout countries.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-28
Author(s):  
Joy Sofiya SNE ◽  
S. Kavitha ◽  
R. Ponnudurai

The present study aims at describing both the common and the distinguishing features of co authorship trends and patterns in Dyxlexia research output based on the data collected from Web of science database published during the 1989-2017. Outcome of the study shows that multi authored articles 83.09% prevail the single authored articles 16.96%. It also shows that author Shaywitz SE J has got highest 7383 global citations against 54 publications. This study is in support for the fact that Dyslexia research output is collaborative in all aspects Ranking of Authors based on Publications.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-128
Author(s):  
Senthilkumar R ◽  
Muthukrishnan M

The paper analysis authorship patterns and collaborative research of oncology research in Indiaas reflected by the research papers listed in Web of Science database for a period of 11 years from 2005-2015. The increased trend towards multiple authorship is predominant as compare to single authorship in case ofoncology in India.In the study, the degree of collaboration was not a constant value, it reveals varies of 0.03 to 0.16 percent and the mean quality as 0.09. The analysis found that single author papers maintained a low profile among oncology research scientists and the multi authorship pattern is expanding slowly in Indian oncology research.


2021 ◽  
pp. 29-41
Author(s):  
Şenol ÇELİK

Çalışmanın amacı, kanatlı hayvan yetiştiriciliği alanında 2002-2019 yılları arasında SCI-Expanded kapsamında yayımlanan makale başlığında “Poulty science” ibaresi olan 338 çalışmayı sosyal ağ analizi ile inceleyerek, son yıllardaki trendleri belirlemektir. Bu kapsamda, Web of Science Core Collection veri tabanında “poultry science” konu başlıklarında tarama gerçekleştirilmiş ve çalışmalara ait bibliyometrik verilere ulaşılmıştır. Kanatlı hayvan yetiştiriciliği konusunda çalışan akademisyen ve araştırmacılara katkı sağlamak amacıyla, poultry science kavramıyla ilgili güncel konular, bu çalışma ile birlikte ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Çalışmalar; yıllara göre yayın sayıları, yayın türleri, atıf analizleri, ülke işbirliktelikleri ve ortak atıf ağları bağlamında incelenmiştir. Ayrıca references, authors and keywords ile references, country and keywords yönelimlerinin belirlenmesinde sosyal ağ analizi kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, “poultry science” alanında en fazla yayın yapan dergiler sırasıyla Poultry Science, Animal Nutrition and International Journal of Food Microbiology dergileridir.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21
Author(s):  
Kiran P. Savanur

This article examines the research output of economics published by BRICS countries during 1991-2016. Data collected from the Web of Science database. Growth rate (CAGR), Collaboration index, Transformative Activity index (TAI), Co-authorship index and Relative Citation Impact (RCI) indicators have been adopted to analyze the quantity and impact of economic research. We found that all five BRICS countries contributed approximately 10 percentile of the world’s economics research. The highest contribution was made by China with a total of 4424 articles which is 40.59 percent. Russia has the maximum growth rate of 27.99. Overall collaboration rate of economics publications of BRICS countries is moderate.


2020 ◽  
pp. 097215092097511
Author(s):  
Asifa Ali ◽  
Irfan Ahmad Hakak ◽  
Faseeh Amin

The aim of this article is to examine the bibliometric analysis of global publication output on coronavirus, as covered in Web of Science during the period from 2000 to 2019. A total of 10,861 documents were found during a 20-year period spanning from 2000 to 2019 published in the ISI Web of Science. The study analyses annual productivity, most productive source titles, prolific countries, eminent institutions, linguistic analysis and productivity of authors and their contribution in the subject area. The findings reveal that the most productive year of publication was 2004 that included 782 publications with the majority published in the Journal of Virology. The result further indicates that the USA, China and Germany are the most productive countries in the field of Coronavirus research output. In terms of institutional output, University of Hong Kong emerged as the most productive institution; Yuen KY from Hong Kong is the most prolific author. In the subject category type, the most prominent subject field is Virology, Infectious Disease and Veterinary Science. The findings of the study are limited to the data harvested from ‘Web of Science’. This study is of immense relevance to researchers and academicians who are searching for answers to this pandemic. This will provide insights to academicians to collaborate with other researchers based on the quality of the research produced by other countries and institutes. The study is useful for researchers, immunologists and epidemiologists who are interested in the field of Coronavirus and serves as a base for future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document