scholarly journals Ultrasound Guided Pedicle Screw Entry Point Identification for Spinal Fusion Surgery

10.29007/chdq ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Qi ◽  
Michael Vives ◽  
Ilker Hacihaliloglu

Accurate identification of the location the vertebra and corresponding pedicle is critical during pedicle screw insertion for percutaneous spinal fusion surgery. Currently, two dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy based navigation systems have extensive usage in spinal fusion surgery. Relying on 2D projection images for screw guidance results in high misplacement rates. Furthermore, fluoroscopy-based guidance exposes the surgical staff and patient to harmful ionizing radiation. Real-time non-radiation-based ultrasound (US) is a potential alternative to intra-operative fluoroscopy. However, accurate interpretation of noisy US data and manual operation of the transducer during data collection remains a challenge. In this work we investigate the potential of using multi-modal deep convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures for fully automatic identification of vertebra level and pedicle from US data. Our proposed network achieves 93.54% vertebra identification accuracy on in vivo US data collected from 27 subjects.

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110035
Author(s):  
Brigita De Vega ◽  
Aida Ribera Navarro ◽  
Alexander Gibson ◽  
Deepak M. Kalaskar

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective: Various methods of pedicle screw (PS) placement in spinal fusion surgery existed, which can be grouped into conventional freehand (FH), modified freehand (MF), and image-guided methods (including fluoroscopy-based navigation (FL), computed tomography-based navigation (CT-nav), robot-assisted (RA), and ultrasound-guided (UG)). However, the literature showed mixed findings regarding their accuracy and complications. This review aimed to discover which method of PS placement has the highest accuracy and lowest complication rate in pediatric and adolescent spinal fusion surgery. Methods: A comprehensive search in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (OVID), CENTRAL, and Web of Science was conducted until May 2020 by 2 independent reviewers, followed by bias assessment with ROB 2 and ROBINS-I tools and quantification with meta-analysis. Overall evidence quality was determined with GRADE tool. Results: Four RCTs and 2 quasi-RCTs/CCTs comprising 3,830 PS placed in 291 patients (4-22 years old) were analyzed. The lowest accuracy was found in FH (78.35%) while the highest accuracy was found in MF (95.86%). MF was more accurate than FH (OR 3.34 (95% CI, 2.33-4.79), P < .00 001, I2 = 0%). Three-dimensional printed drill template (as part of MF) was more accurate than FH (OR 3.10 (95% CI, 1.98-4.86), P < .00 001, I2 = 14%). Overall, complications occurred in 5.84% of the patients with 0.34% revision rate. Complication events in MF was lower compared to FH (OR 0.47 (95% CI, 0.10-2.15), P = .33, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Meta-analysis shows that MF is more accurate than FH in pediatric and adolescent requiring PS placement for spinal fusion surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 4746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiwoon Kwon ◽  
Myung Heon Ha ◽  
Moon Gu Lee

With the recent increase in the elderly population, many people suffer from spinal diseases, and, accordingly, spinal fusion surgery using pedicle screws has been widely applied to treat them. However, most research on pedicle screw design has been focused on the test results rather than the behavior of the screws and vertebrae. In this study, a design platform with a series of biomechanical tests and analyses were presented for pedicle screw improvement and evaluation. The platform was then applied to an alternative hybrid screw design with quadruple and double threads. An experimental apparatus was developed to investigate the bending strength of the screw, and several tests were performed based on the ASTM F1717 standard. In the experiments, it was confirmed that the alternative pedicle screw has the highest bending strength. To examine the stress distribution of pedicle screws, finite element models were established, through which it was found that the proposed pedicle screw has sufficient mechanical safety to make it acceptable for spinal fusion treatment. Finally, we conclude that the platform has good potential for the design and evaluation of pedicle screws, and the alternative dual screw design is one of the best options for spinal fusion surgery.


2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 651-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Al-Hassan Aly ◽  
Howard J. Ginsberg ◽  
Richard S.C. Cobbold

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimasa Takahashi ◽  
Ken’ichiro Narusawa ◽  
Kenji Shimizu ◽  
Masakazu Takata ◽  
Toshitaka Nakamura

2004 ◽  
Vol 350 (7) ◽  
pp. 722-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Deyo ◽  
Alf Nachemson ◽  
Sohail K. Mirza

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document