RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF INTRACRANIAL AND INTRASPINAL SPACE OCCUPYING LESIONS AT A TERTIARY CARE CENTER- A FIVE YEAR STUDY

Background: Tumors of Central Nervous System constitute approximately 2% of all malignancies. Cancers of the central nervous system (CNS) are considered to be among the most notorious of all cancers. Low-grade cns tumors have been found over time to progress to high grade tumors. CNS is a common site for metastasis from other organs. Due to newer techniques used in radio diagnosis and stereotactic biopsies, more & more CNS tumors are being diagnosed & are being operated upon. Aims and objectives: The objective of this article is to provide an overview of intracranial and intraspinal space occupying lesions at a single tertiary care referral center. The aim was to study incidence of various lesions in light of the WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system, 2016 and to study relevant statistics. Material and methods: A total of 124 cases were received between January,2007 & December, 2011 at Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College and Hospital, Pune. Intraoperative diagnosis was desired in 70 cases. The final diagnoses in all the cases were made on Hematoxylin and Eosin stained slides of routinely processed tissue. Results: Neoplastic lesions comprised 83.88 %, including metastatic tumors while 16.12 % were nonneoplastic. A wide range of histopathological spectrum of CNS tumors was observed and was classified according to WHO classification of CNS tumors, 2016. The primary CNS tumors were graded from Grade I to IV according to WHO grading system, 2016. Astrocytic tumors constituted the largest category with 33 cases and most of the astrocytomas were grade II at the time of diagnosis. Incidence was more in females than males and maximum number of lesions were seen in fifth and sixth decades of life. Conclusion: This study highlights the histological diversity of CNS tumors in both adults and children. The most common destructive but nonneoplastic lesions like, infections/abscesses, infarct and cysts can be diagnosed, by crush cytology and frozen section for the definitive management.

Download Full-text

EPID-26. ALIGNING THE CBTRUS HISTOLOGY GROUPS WITH 2016 WHO CLASSIFICATION OF TUMORS OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noab196.359 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽

pp. vi91-vi91

Author(s):

Carol Kruchko ◽

Nirav Patil ◽

Gino Cioffi ◽

Daniel Brat ◽

Janet Bruner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Central Nervous System ◽

Nervous System ◽

Who Classification ◽

The United States ◽

Cns Tumors ◽

World Health ◽

Mesenchymal Tumors ◽

The Central Nervous System ◽

Health Organization

Abstract BACKGROUND The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) uses a histology grouping scheme modeled after the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System (CNS) to classify cancer registry records for clinically relevant statistical reporting. Molecular studies have identified genetic features which precisely stratify tumor types, resulting in the 2016 update to the WHO Classification incorporating these markers. To continue providing clinically relevant statistics, the histology groupings have been aligned with the 2016 update. Resulting changes to groupings were assessed. METHODS In collaboration with four consulting neuropathologists the scheme was reviewed and realigned to the 2016 update. Obsolete histology nomenclature and ICD-O-3 codes were identified. Evaluation of the frequency of affected codes in the 2013-2017 data was conducted. RESULTS 417,767 total cases of primary brain and CNS tumors were diagnosed during 2013-2017 in the US. After review of the CBTRUS grouping scheme, 67 codes were noted to be obsolete, 51 codes were re-classified and 12 new codes were incorporated. This reorganization could result in grouping assignment or reporting changes for 2,588 cases (0.6%). The histology groups most significantly affected were mesenchymal tumors and neuronal and mixed neuronal glial tumors. CONCLUSIONS The 2016 revision to WHO Classification has affected collection and reporting of CNS tumors. The CBTRUS data edits program is now undergoing revision, which will become the basis of reporting. Some histology-specific molecular markers require additional data to distinguish between cases. In collaboration with CBTRUS, the NAACCR SSDI Committee developed a new variable for collection of molecular information. This variable was included in Uniform Data Standards beginning on January 1, 2018 and will be available for reporting in 2021. A 2021 update to the WHO Classification is scheduled for release later this year, requiring further classification updates.

Download Full-text

The Current WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System: Histopathology and Additional Diagnostic Methods

Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews ◽

10.2174/157340510793205495 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 6 (4) ◽

pp. 200-219 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Michel Mittelbronn

Keyword(s):

Central Nervous System ◽

Nervous System ◽

Who Classification ◽

Diagnostic Methods ◽

The Central Nervous System

Download Full-text

Letter to the Editor: “The Neurosurgical Perspective for the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Missed Opportunity?”

World Neurosurgery ◽

10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.149 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 155 ◽

pp. 203-204

Author(s):

Daniele Armocida ◽

Alessandro Pesce ◽

Antonio Santoro ◽

Maurizio Salvati ◽

Alessandro Frati

Keyword(s):

Central Nervous System ◽

Nervous System ◽

Who Classification ◽

System A ◽

Letter To The Editor ◽

The Central Nervous System ◽

Classification Of Tumors ◽

Missed Opportunity

Download Full-text

Introduction to WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, 2016

Neuropathology of Brain Tumors with Radiologic Correlates ◽

10.1007/978-981-15-7126-8_3 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 9-13

Author(s):

Meghana Chougule

Keyword(s):

Central Nervous System ◽

Nervous System ◽

Who Classification ◽

The Central Nervous System ◽

Classification Of Tumors

Download Full-text

The 2016 revision of the WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system

10.1093/med/9780199651870.003.0001 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

Paul Kleihues ◽

Elisabeth Rushing ◽

Hiroko Ohgaki

Keyword(s):

Central Nervous System ◽

Nervous System ◽

Who Classification ◽

De Novo ◽

Genetic Profiling ◽

Primary Glioblastoma ◽

System P ◽

Significant Step ◽

The Central Nervous System

The revised fourth edition of the WHO classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, published in 2016, comprises several newly recognized tumour entities, and a significant restructuring of the classification, mainly based on genetic profiling. Glioblastomas are now classified into two major types. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma (primary glioblastoma IDH-wildtype) develops rapidly de novo without a recognizable precursor lesion. IDH-mutant glioblastoma (secondary glioblastoma IDH-mutant) develops more slowly through malignant progression from diffuse or anaplastic astrocytoma. Medulloblastomas are now defined by combining histological patterns (classic, desmoplastic/nodular, extensive nodularity, anaplastic) and genetic hallmarks (WNT-activated; SHH-activated, TP53-mutant; SHH-activated, TP53-wildtype; non-WNT/non-SHH). Other newly recognized tumour entities include diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant; ependymoma, RELA fusion-positive; and embryonal tumour with multilayered rosettes. The new classification is a significant step forward and will facilitate the development of novel targeted therapies of brain tumours.

Download Full-text