scholarly journals The Effects of Lumbo-pelvic Stabilization on Hip Flexion Range of Motion Measurement

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-hoon Jung ◽  
Sung-min Ha
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Motion Measurement ◽  
Hip Flexion ◽  
Pelvic Stabilization

scholarly journals Reliability of hip range of motion measurement among experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D Harris ◽  
Richard C Mather ◽  
Shane J Nho ◽  
John P Salvo ◽  
Allston J Stubbs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Pelvic Tilt ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Motion Measurement ◽  
Hip Range Of Motion ◽  
Asymptomatic Volunteers ◽  
Hip Flexion ◽  
Hip Internal Rotation ◽  
Intra Class Correlation Coefficient

Abstract The aim of this study was to determine (i) the reliability of hip range of motion measurement among experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons and (ii) the magnitude of hip flexion change with posterior pelvic tilt. Five experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons (5–18 years of hip surgery experience) performed passive hip range of motion (internal and external rotation), flexion (contralateral hip extended) and flexion with posterior pelvic tilt (contralateral hip maximally flexed) on five young healthy asymptomatic volunteers (three males, two females; 34.4 ± 10.7 years of age). Motion was measured via digital photography and goniometry. Inter-observer reliability was calculated via two-way mixed, single measures, intra-class correlation coefficient. Paired t-test was utilized to compare hip flexion (with contralateral hip extended) to hip flexion with posterior pelvic tilt (with contralateral hip in forced flexion). The reliabilities of measurements of hip flexion with posterior pelvic tilt and external rotation were excellent, that of hip flexion was fair, and that of hip internal rotation was poor. The magnitude of hip flexion increase with posterior pelvic tilt was 17.0° ± 3.0° (P < 0.001). The reliability of hip range of motion measurement by five experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons was excellent for measures of hip flexion with posterior pelvic tilt and external rotation. Contralateral maximal hip flexion significantly increased ipsilateral hip flexion (approximately 17°). Level of Evidence: Diagnostic, level III (without consistently applied reference standard)

Range of motion measurement of Articulatio cubiti based on Hough transformation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mastri Cahyaningtyas Pediyanti ◽  
Riries Rulaningtyas ◽  
Akif Rahmatillah ◽  
Katherine
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Motion Measurement ◽  
Hough Transformation

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Neural Mobilization and Rhythmic Stabilization in Range of Motion and Hip Pain

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Samyla Maria Araújo Ponte ◽  
Leydnaya Maria Souza ◽  
Bruno Cunha da Costa ◽  
Guilherme Pertinni de Morais Gouveia
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Great Majority ◽  
Hip Pain ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Active Movement ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Passive Mobilization ◽  
Stabilization Technique ◽  
Hip Flexion

Background: The hip is a structure of the human body in which occurs the junction of bone, articular, muscular and ligament structures. It is in the coxofemoral joint and has the function of supporting the whole-body weight, being one of the main joints responsible for ambulation. Objectives: To analyze the comparison of neural mobilization and rhythmic stabilization techniques in range of motion (ROM) and hip pain. Methods: The sample was composed by 20 patients, with mean age of 54±6 years, were divided into two groups of 10 patients: the patients who received the neural mobilization technique (G1) and the patients who received the rhythmic stabilization technique (G2). Results: The mean age of each group was 56±6 years (G1) and 52±6 years (G2). Among the evaluated, 12 (60%) were female, 14 (70%) were married, predominating the profession of housewife (35%). The great majority of the participants (95%) presented pain to the active movement, mainly to the movements of hip flexion and abduction. Regarding passive mobilization, 70% referred pains, predominating to the movements of hip external rotation and abduction. Conclusion: It was concluded that the neural mobilization and rhythmic stabilization techniques had satisfactory results in relation to ROM and pain in the hip region, but rhythmic stabilization had a greater gain of ROM and decrease of pain.

Reliability of hip internal rotation range of motion measurement using a digital inclinometer

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 2562-2567 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Krause ◽  
John H. Hollman ◽  
Aaron J. Krych ◽  
Michael M. Kalisvaart ◽  
Bruce A. Levy
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Motion Measurement ◽  
Digital Inclinometer ◽  
Hip Internal Rotation

Metacarpal Arc Motion: Comparison of Different Measurement Methods

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Büren ◽  
Abdullah Al Maktary ◽  
Joachim Windolf ◽  
Sebastian V. Gehrmann
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Optical Technique ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Motion Measurement ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Palmar Flexion ◽  
Cmc Joint ◽  
Healthy Persons

Abstract Introduction The range of motion of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joints is difficult to assess in clinical practice. Materials and Methods The purpose of this study was to measure a precise range of motion measurement of the metacarpal arc during maximum palmar flexion of the fifth CMC joint in healthy persons with three different methods: optical, electrogoniometrical, and sonographical. Results The metacarpal arc motion measured with the optical technique was 24.9 degrees (standard deviation [SD]: 6.2 degrees), with the electrogoniometric technique was 24.3 degrees (SD: 3.6 degrees) and with sonography was 25.1 degrees (SD: 3.5 degrees), with no differences between left and right hand for all methods. Conclusion This study shows that different techniques can be used for the measurement of the metacarpal arc motion. With these techniques, it is possible to assess the metacarpal arc in patients with fractures to the CMC joints to evaluate posttraumatic function und rehabilitation progress. This study shows level of evidence as III.

scholarly journals Chronic Effects of Different Resistance Training Exercise Orders on Flexibility in Elite Judo Athletes

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alam R. Saraiva ◽  
Victor M. Reis ◽  
Pablo B. Costa ◽  
Claudio M. Bentes ◽  
Gabriel V. Costa e Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Shoulder Abduction ◽  
Upper Limbs ◽  
Trunk Flexion ◽  
Resistance Training Program ◽  
Judo Athletes ◽  
Hip Flexion

Abstract The aim of this study was to examine the effects of twelve weeks of resistance training with different exercise orders (upper limbs and lower limbs vs. lower limbs and upper limbs) on flexibility levels in elite judo athletes. Thirtynine male athletes were randomly divided into 3 groups as follows: G1 (n = 13), G2 (n = 13), and CG (n = 13). The flexibility was assessed on 8 joint movements: shoulder flexion and shoulder extension, shoulder abduction and shoulder adduction, trunk flexion and trunk extension, and hip flexion and hip extension. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs (time [pre-experimental vs. post-experimental] × group [G1 vs. G2 vs. CG]) were used to compare the differences between pre- and post-test situations and the differences among groups. The results from the within-group (pre vs. post) comparisons demonstrated significant increases (p < 0.05) in the range of motion of 3.93 and 5.96% for G1 and G2 training groups, respectively, in all joints. No significant changes (p > 0.05) were observed for the CG. The results from the between-group comparisons demonstrated no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the range of motion between G1post vs. G2post (1.15%). Although both exercise orders (from upper to lower limbs and from lower to upper limbs) increased flexibility, no significant variations were observed between the different exercise orders. Nevertheless, these findings demonstrate that flexibility gains could be obtained with a resistance training program, and thus, more time can be devoted to sports-specific judo training.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document