scholarly journals Comparison of distal third forearm fractures in children treated with above elbow verses below elbow cast.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1989-1992
Author(s):  
Basharat Manzoor ◽  
Waseem Yousaf ◽  
M Irfan Fareed ◽  
Sajjad Iqbal ◽  
M. Javed Iqbal Awan
Keyword(s):  
Forearm Fracture ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Forearm Fractures ◽  
Closed Fracture ◽  
Fractures In Children ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B ◽  
Study Setting

ABSTRACT: In childhood most common fractures are closed fracture of the distal third of the forearm in children, after closed reduction of the forearm fractures of distal third were immobilized with long arm cast and by some orthopedic surgeon with short arm cast. Objectives: To compare the result of above elbow cast with below elbow cast in the treatment of distal third forearm fractures in children. Study Design: Randomized study. Setting: Department of orthopedics, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad. Period: One year 14-Sep, 2015 to 15-Aug, 2016. Results: 180 Cases fulfilling the inclusion / exclusion criteria were included in the study. In group A38.89% (%35) in our study and group B 45.56% (n=41) were between 1-6 years of age while. In group A 61.11% (n=55) and group B 54.44% (n=49) were 7-12 years of age of the children mean + sd 7.66 + 2.54 and 7.38 + 2.46 years respectively, In group A 58.89 % (n=53) in group B 62.22% (n=56) were male while group –A 41-11% (N37) and in group B 37.78% were females below elbow cast compared with above elbow cast in treating distal one third forearm fracture in children shows that group A 23.33% (n+21) and group B 30% (n=27) and re displacement shows no significant difference between their two groups. Conclusion: We concluded there is no significant difference in outcome of above elbow cast with below elbow cast after reduction treating the fracture of children in distal on third forearm fractures.

Comparison of Outcome of Three Different Approaches for Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 3482-3484
Author(s):  
Syed Usman Shah ◽  
Mohammad Younas ◽  
Naseer Ullah Khattak ◽  
Amina Gul Shehzar Khan ◽  
Sultan Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Supracondylar Fractures ◽  
Medial Approach ◽  
Fractures In Children ◽  
Supracondylar Humerus Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Humerus Fractures ◽  
Group B

Objective: The aim of this study is compare the outcomes among three different approaches (lateral approach, medial approach and posterior approach) for supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study Place and Duration: The study was conducted at Orthopedics department of Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad for duration of one year from January 2020 to December 2020. Methods: There were one hundred and thirty five children had supracondylar humerus fracture were presented. Patients were aged between 3-12 years. Informed written consent was taken from authorities for detailed demographics age, sex, cause of fracture and side of fracture. Patients were categorized into three equal groups, group A had 45 patients and received lateral approach, group B had 45 patients and received medial approach and group C received posterior approach with 45 cases. Shaft Condylar Angle (SCA) and Baumann angle were used to analyze the radiological result. All children were assessed using Flynn's criteria for functional outcomes, and the results were divided into Excellent, Good, Fair and Poor. Post-operative outcomes among all the three groups were calculated and compared. SPSS 23.0 version was used to analyze complete data. Results: There were 90 (66.7%) males (30 in each group and 45 (33.3%) females (15 in each group). In group A mean age was 6.88±5.45 years, mean age in group B was 7.11±5.33 years and in group C mean age was 7.17±5.66 years. Sports 85 (62.9%) was the most common cause of fracture followed by traffic accidents 30 (22.2%) and the rest were 20 (14.8%) fall from the height. According to radiological outcomes, Mean shaft condylar Angle in group A was 41.5±6.3, in group B was 41.8±1.9 and in group C was 40.1±3.8 respectively (P>0.05). Mean Bauman angle in group A was 18.8±6.11, group B was 19.4±7.5 and in group C 20.4±5.3 with (P>0.05). According to Flynn’s criteria, excellent outcomes were observed in 33 (73.3%) in LA group, 24 (53.3%) in MA group and 22 (48.9%) in PA group, good results were observed in 11(24.4%), 19 (42.2%) and 21 (46.7%), fair outcomes in 1 (2.2%), 2 (4.4%) and 2 (4.4%). Conclusion: As a result of this research, we have concluded that the lateral technique for supracondylar fractures is superior to the medial or posterior approaches in terms of radiological and functional results. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups. Keywords: Supracondylar fractures, Flynn’s criteria, Functional outcome, Open reduction

Perforator-Based Flap Reconstruction after Melanoma Resection: Evaluation of Oncological, Aesthetic, and Functional Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beniamino Brunetti ◽  
Rosa Salzillo ◽  
Stefania Tenna ◽  
Bruno Brunetti ◽  
Mario Alessandri Bonetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Locoregional Recurrence ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Evidence in literature about the best reconstructive approach after melanoma resection is controversial, with some authors advocating that tissue rearrangement flap techniques might hinder the early detection of local relapses. The aim of the present study is to evaluate oncological, aesthetic, and functional outcomes following melanoma reconstruction using pedicled perforator-based flaps. Methods The authors reviewed all patients affected by melanoma treated during a 6-year period. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, and operative variables were evaluated. Locoregional recurrence was assessed with clinical and radiological follow-up. One-year postoperatively patients rated on a 5-point Likert scale the aesthetic and functional outcomes of the procedure. Three blind observers examined preoperative and 1-year postoperative photographs and rated the aesthetic outcome of the reconstructive procedure. Results One-hundred sixty-five patients were treated with wide excision and delayed reconstruction, including pedicled perforator-based flaps in 70 patients (group A) and primary closure in 95 patients (group B). Mean Breslow thickness was 2.972 and 2.189 mm in group A and B, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in locoregional recurrence (chi-squared test, p = 0.8333; Fisher's exact test, p > 0.9999) between the two groups. Group A reported a higher satisfaction with both the aesthetic (mean rating 4.390 in group A and 4.094 in group B) and functional (mean rating 4.732 in group A and 4.170 in group B) outcomes of the procedure, the latter being statistically significant (p = 0.0006). Conclusion This series suggests that pedicled perforator-based flaps provide optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes in melanoma reconstruction without impairing the locoregional control of the disease.

scholarly journals A comparative study of the effect of piroxicam versus diclofenac on wound healing in clean abdominal wounds

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandrashekar Reddy J. Madinur ◽  
Prashant Tubachi ◽  
Prashant Tubachi ◽  
A. S. Godhi ◽  
A. S. Godhi
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Individual

Background: The primary function of the skin is to serve as a protective barrier against the environment. The process of wound healing constitutes an array of interrelated and concomitant events. Understanding these processes and various factors affecting these processes continue to expand. The present study was undertaken to compare and evaluate the effect of piroxicam versus diclofenac on wound healing in clean abdominal wounds.Methods: The present one year randomized controlled trial was conducted on all the patients undergoing appendicectomies for uncomplicated appendicitis and uncomplicated inguinal hernia repairs in the Department of Surgery, KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Belgaum during the period of one year. Based on the thumb rule a total of 60 patients divided into two groups of 30 each were studied. Based on the computer-generated randomization patients were allocated to two groups that is group A (Inj. Piroxicam) and Group B (Inj. Diclofenac).Results: In the present study, males outnumbered females with male to female ratio between of 1.72 to 2:1. The mean age in group A was30.9±7.86 years and in group B it was 30.3±7.97 years. Both the groups that is Group A and B were graded under grade I (Good wound healing) from the POD 3 onwards. Overall the individual score and total scores had no influence of the final grading (outcome) of the wound.Conclusions: Overall, better results were seen on wound healing in patients who received Inj piroxicam with significantly less post-operative redness and edema. However, this did not have significant difference in the final outcome of the grading of the wound. 

scholarly journals To compare efficacy of Diclofenac by intramuscular route and rectal route in post surgical pain.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (09) ◽  
pp. 1269-1275
Author(s):  
Maryam Zulfiqar ◽  
Maimoona Ashraf ◽  
M. Imran Hassan Khan ◽  
Fareed Naeem ◽  
Salman Shakeel
Keyword(s):  
General Hospital ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Diclofenac Sodium ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Surgical Pain ◽  
Rectal Route ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Study Setting

Objective: This study was carried out in Lahore General Hospital, Lahore to test the results of Intramuscular vs Suppository form of Diclofenac Sodium on the severity of post-surgical pain in patients who underwent Cesarean delivery under Subarachnoid Block. Study Design: Randomized Study. Setting: Lahore General Hospital, Lahore. Period: April 2019 to September 2019. Material & Methods: This was a double-blind run on 100 patients who underwent for cesarean delivery irrespective of any indication for the procedure. The pain sufferers had been randomly divided into 2 groups. The group A: who received Diclofenac Sodium in the form of suppository and Group B: who received intramuscular Diclofanec Sodium? The pain severity was assessed using VAS scale at categorically unique times. Data was then analyzed using SPSS 23 version and the results were compiled in the form of mean and percentage. Results: The mean age (Years) of patients was (25.27±6.07). There was a big statistical difference between the 2 groups regarding pain score after the intervention (p=0.018). Conclusion: To reaffirm the effectiveness of Diclofenac for Post-Caesarean section, the physique part (Suppository) is established to hold advantages over the contractile organ (muscles).

scholarly journals Closed versus open lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in a chronic anal fissure

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anandaravi B. N. ◽  
Ramaswami B.
Keyword(s):  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy ◽  
Internal Sphincterotomy ◽  
Closed Technique ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Anal fissure is a common proctological problem, which presents with pain in the anal region during and after defecation. The aim of the study was to determine the best technique for surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure patients.Methods: The study was designed as a prospective randomized study. The study was conducted in surgical unit, K.R. Hospital, MMCRI, Mysore, India from January 2015 to June 2016. A total of 100 patients undergoing surgery were divided into two groups. In group A there were 50 patients who were treated by closed lateral internal anal sphincterotomy, and in group B there were 50 patients who were managed by open lateral internal anal sphincterotomy method. Patients were followed up for 6 months following surgery to observe for pain, bleeding, infection, incontinence, and recurrence. The exclusion criteria were patients who had in addition haemorrhoids or any other anorectal diseases.Results: There was acceptable difference in postoperative acute complications between the two methods of internal anal sphincterotomy. However, in group A, three patients (6%) versus 10 (20%) were complicated with incontinence postoperatively, whereas the recurrence rate was 4 versus 4% in group A versus group B, respectively (P = 0.015).Conclusions: There was significant difference between closed and open methods of lateral internal sphincterotomy in recurrence rate, healing rate, and other complications. Closed lateral internal sphincterotomy is treatment of choice for chronic anal fissure and can be done effectively and safely with acceptable rate of complications. Our recommendations are that closed technique should be adopted by experienced surgeons and Trainee should be initially trained by open technique then be shifted to closed technique.

scholarly journals DORSAL WRIST GANGLION

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (03) ◽  
pp. 246-250
Author(s):  
Yousaf Jan ◽  
Waqas Ahmad ◽  
Shaukat Hussain ◽  
Muhammad Shah ◽  
Ahmad Din
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Research Committee ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Group A ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B ◽  
Study Setting ◽  
Dorsal Wrist Ganglion

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effect of aspiration plus methylprednisone injection versus surgical excision of the dorsal wrist ganglions in terms of resolution,complications and recurrence. Study Design: Prospective study. Setting: Surgical wardHayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. Period: June 2009 to December 2011. Methodology:After taking permission from ethical and research committee. Included patients were all adult ofboth gender with dorsal wrist ganglion. Patients with cancer, bleeding disorders and diabeteswere excluded from the study. The patients were divided in two groups: Group A includedpatients for aspiration and injection treatment, while Group B included patients underwentsurgical excision. All the patients were followed for complete resolution of ganglion, anycomplications of treatment and recurrence within one year. Follow up arranged at 7th day, 1,3, 6 and 12 months. Results: Total of 80 patients was included in the study. Out of 80, 65%(n=52) were females while 35% (n=28) were males. The mean age was 26.37±5.62 years.Group A and group B patients had overall success rates of 75% and 95%, with recurrence of25% and 5% in group A and group B respectively. In methylprednisolone group, mild pain wasreported by 70% (n=28), while in the surgical excision group, all the patients experienced mildto moderate pain postoperatively which necessitated oral analgesics for few days. Conclusion:Surgical excision is superior to injection-aspiration method for dorsal wrist ganglion treatmentbecause of high success and low recurrence rate. As injection-aspiration treatment

scholarly journals PLACENTA PREVIA ACCRETA;

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (05) ◽  
pp. 905-908
Author(s):  
Saima Mustafa Khan ◽  
Bushra Khan ◽  
Mehjabeen Khan
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynecology ◽  
Caesarean Scar ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Study Setting

Objective: To compare outcome of antenatal diagnosed cases of placentaprevia accreta in previous caesarean scar with undiagnosed cases of placenta previa accretain previous caesarean scar. Study Design: Cohort Study. Setting: The study was carried outin department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nishtar Hospital Multan. Population: Method:Total 206 cases were included in the study divided into two groups. Group A had 103 antenataldiagnosed cases of placenta previa accreta in previous caesarean scar and Group B comprised103 cases un-diagnosed having placenta previa accreta in previous caesarean scar. OutcomeMeasure: Outcome was determined in terms of morbidity (i.e Hysterectomy) and mortality.Results: It was found that hysterectomy was performed in 47 (45.6 %) vs 36 (35 %) diagnosedand un-diagnosed cases respectively. 9 (8.7%) vs 2(1.9%) cases died in diagnosed andundiagnosed Cases respectively. Conclusions: No significant difference in term of morbiditywas found between diagnosed and un- diagnosed cases of placenta previa accreta in previouscaesarean scar. Mortality was high in diagnosed cases of placenta previa accreta in previaouscaesarean scar.

scholarly journals Dispositivos interespinosos en discectomías lumbares primarias. ¿Favorecen la recurrencia de la hernia de discos? [Interspinous device in primary lumbar discectomy. Does it favor the recurrence of disc herniation?]

2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-111
Author(s):  
Joint Halley Guimbard Pérez ◽  
Mariano Pomba ◽  
Gustavo Alejandro González ◽  
Nicolás Ortiz
Keyword(s):  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Herniated Disc ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Interspinous Spacers ◽  
Group B ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Lost To Follow Up

Objetivo: Evaluar si la colocación de los dispositivos interespinosos siliconados tipo DIAM favorecen una tasa más alta de recidiva de la hernia discal homolateral clínica y por imágenes comparada con la discectomía pura.Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo, observacional, aleatorizado desde mayo de 2009 hasta mayo de 2013, en nuestro Centro. Se evaluó a 123 pacientes, 3 se perdieron en el seguimiento; l muestra incluyó 120 sujetos. Todos fueron operados por el mismo equipo quirúrgico. Se formaron dos grupos: grupo A: discectomía más colocación de dispositivo interespinoso siliconado, 30 pacientes (16 mujeres y 14 hombres), con mayor frecuencia L4-L5 (27 pacientes, 90%) y grupo B: discectomías puras, 90 pacientes (53 mujeres y 37 hombres) con más frecuencia L4 y L5 (72 pacientes, 80%).Resultados: Seis de los pacientes del grupo A (20%) tuvieron una recidiva clínica y por imágenes, y 3 (10%) fueron operados nuevamente; en el grupo B, hubo 4 recidivas discales (4,4%), uno fue operado nuevamente (1,1%). Se hallaron diferencias significativas en las tasas de recidiva y reintervención entre los grupos (p = 0,0073 y p = 0,0188, respectivamente).Conclusiones: Los beneficios de los dispositivos interespinosos para tratar el canal estrecho lumbar secundario a hernia de disco son controvertidos, pero en nuestro estudio, se halló una diferencia significativa según el grupo. Al mantener el movimiento del segmento y cambiar ligeramente las cargas fisiológicas aumentarían la tasa de recidiva discal; no obstante, son necesarios estudios con mayor evidencia científica para corroborar estas tendencias. AbstractObjective: The objective of this study was to evaluate if discectomy with placement of an interspinous silicon DIAM spacer is associated with a different rate of clinical and radiographic ipsilateral disc herniation recurrence than discectomy alone.Methods: A prospective, observational,randomized study was performed from May 2009 to May 2013 at XXXXX. Of the 123 patients included in the study, 3 were lost to follow-up, leaving 120 patients for data analysis. All patients were operated on by the same surgical team. Patients received one of two types of treatment. Group A consisted of 30 patients (16 women and 14 ment) who underwent discectomy with placement of an interspinous silicone DIAM spacer. Group B was composed of 90 patients (53 women and 37 men) who received discectomy alone.Results: Discectomy at L4-L5 was the most common level, occurring in 90% (27) Group A patients and 80% (72) Group B patients. Group A demonstrated clinical and radiographic disc herniation recurrence in 6/30 (20%) of patients. Disc herniation recurrence developed in 4/90 (4.4%) Group B patients. One patient underwent reoperation (1.1%). Both recurrence and reoperation was significantly higher in Group A (p = 0.007 and p = 0.019, respectively).Conclusions: The benefits of interespinosos devices for the treatment of the lumbar spinal stenosis secondary to herniated disc while they are controversial in the present study showed significant difference according to the Group. In this study, patients that underwent discectomy and interspinous spaceer placement had higher reoperation and recurrence rates than discectomy patients that did not receive an interspinous spacer. Interspinous spacers may increase the rate of disc herniation by maintaining movement at the level of prior disc herniation and changing the physiologic load. More studies are needed to corroborate and evaluate these trends.

Simple Decompression versus Anterior Submuscular Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve in Severe Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Study

Neurosurgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Gervasio ◽  
Giuseppe Gambardella ◽  
Claudio Zaccone ◽  
Damiano Branca
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Prospective Randomized Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Group B ◽  
Simple Decompression

Abstract OBJECTIVE: The authors report the results of a clinical series of selected patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome. The degree of ulnar nerve compression was evaluated by use of a grading system that includes measurements of motor and sensitive function. The submuscular transposition with flexor-pronator mass Z lengthening was compared with simple decompression through a prospective randomized study. METHODS: From February 1998 to June 2003, 70 patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome were included in this study: 35 patients were submitted to simple decompression (Group A), and 35 patients were treated by anterior deep submuscular transposition (Group B). The preoperative status was determined by use of Dellon's classification. The selected patients had Dellon's Grade 3 (severe syndrome). The mean follow-up period after surgery was 47 months for Group A and 46.94 months for Group B. RESULTS: Postoperative clinical and electrophysiological outcomes were assessed 6 months after surgery in all 70 patients. According to the Bishop scoring system, 19 patients (54.3%) of Group A were clinically graded as excellent, 9 (25.7%) were graded as good, and 7 (20%) were graded as fair; in Group B, 18 patients (51.43%) were graded as excellent, 11 (31.43%) as good, and 6 (17.14%) as fair. Neither severe complications nor recurrences were observed in the two groups. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to the clinical or the electrophysiological outcome. The surgical treatment gains in Group A and B were 80% and 82.86%, respectively (good to excellent results).

scholarly journals Prospective Randomized Study between Open Vs Closed Lateral Anal Internal Sphincterotomy in Patients with Chronic Fissure in Ano

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-171
Author(s):  
Anand Shanmugaiah ◽  
Saravanan Pandian
Keyword(s):  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Fissure In Ano ◽  
Internal Sphincterotomy ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: One of the the most common cause of pain during defecationin young patientsis chronic fissure in ano. Surgical treatment of choice for chronic fissure in ano is internal sphincterotomy. This procedure can be performed by open or closed method. The aim of the study was to compare the closed and open anal internal sphincterotomy in patients admitted in our hospital with chronic anal fissure. Subjects and Methods: 105 patients admitted in department of general surgery with chronic fissure in ano were divided into two groups. 50 patients (Group A) who were treated by closed method and 55 patients (Group B) who were managed by open lateralanal sphincterotomy method. A 3 months follow up done in both post-surgery to observe for pain, bleeding, infection, incontinence, and recurrence. Results: Significant difference was observed in postoperative acute complications between the two methods of internal anal sphincterotomy. Conclusion: Lateral anal sphincterotomy is the treatment of choice for chronic anal fissure, either open or closed method. However, the closed method was observed to have lesserpost operative complication compared to the open method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document