scholarly journals Critical reflections on staff-student partnership and ‘re-interpreting’ journal submissions

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-108
Author(s):  
Lorna Mary Cork

This thoughtpiece shares some personal reflections on a distinctively different approach to student-staff collaboration, whereby students ‘re-interpret’ scholarly submissions to this new HE journal for a wider audience. Student and staff motivations for becoming involved in this work of partnering are examined, and values and ‘intrigue’ are uncovered as contributing to partnership-readiness and sustaining interest. Students engaged critically with Higher Education policy and theory; particularly the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) and the concept of a ladder of partnership. The collaboration offers different conceptual lenses, revealing possibilities for the co-creation of a student-staff scholarly community. Student reflections reveal digital literacies for producing re-interpretations and the ‘softer’ skills for collaborating in diverse groups.  However, the key appeal of getting involved is not, as may be assumed, for benefits such as employability, it is the opportunity of collaborating across disciplines and as an equal partner with staff,  where their voices contribute to real debates about teaching and learning in HE.

Author(s):  
Matthew Johnson ◽  
Margaret Partlo ◽  
Tammy Hullender ◽  
Emmanuel Akanwa ◽  
Heather Burke ◽  
...  

Public deliberation provides an inclusive and robust mechanism for making shared decisions in community and political settings; however, its application to teaching and learning remains underutilized (McMillan & Harriger, 2007). This manuscript reports on a case study of the use of public deliberation as a teaching andragogy in a graduate level course in higher education policy, which showed that public deliberation creates greater ownership of the course, fosters critical thinking and student agency, and implicates taking action.


Author(s):  
Jane Kotzmann

A human right to higher education was included in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which came into force in 1976. Yet the world has changed significantly since it was drafted. State legislation and policies have generally followed a neo-liberal trajectory, shifting the perception of higher education from being a public good to being a commodity. This model has been criticised, particularly because it generally reinforces social inequality. At the same time, attaining higher education has become more important than ever. Higher education is a prerequisite for many jobs, and those who have attained higher education enjoy improved life circumstances. This book seeks to determine whether there is still a place for the human right to higher education in the current international context. In seeking to answer this question, this book compares and contrasts two general theoretical models that are used to frame higher education policy: the market-based approach and the human rights-based approach. In doing so, it seeks to contribute to an understanding of the likely effectiveness of market-based versus human rights-based approaches to higher education provision in terms of teaching and learning. This understanding should enable the development of more considered, sophisticated and ultimately successful higher education policies. This book contends that a human rights-based approach to higher education policy is more likely to enable the achievement of higher education purposes than a market-based approach. In reaching this conclusion, the book identifies some strategic considerations of relevance for advocates of a human rights-based approach in this context.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Murphy ◽  
Terry Maguire

This summary outlines the findings that emerged from the National Forum’s project on higher education policy and the challenges and opportunities posed for teaching and learning by digital technology. The project sought to define whether existing policies were enabling and reflected the language of digital teaching and learning. The summary discusses the findings within the wider context of a national and international drive toward utilising digital technology to facilitate a more flexible learning environment.


Author(s):  
Jane Kotzmann

This chapter establishes a framework for evaluating higher education policy in relation to teaching and learning. It identifies the proper purposes of higher education, which include furthering individual transformation, improving society, and contributing to social efficiency. In this context, it is contended that social mobility is not a valid purpose of higher education. The chapter then identifies signs that indicate that the teaching and learning within a higher education system is meeting these purposes. These signs are categorized according to the identified purposes of higher education. Finally, the chapter outlines a methodology for measuring these signs within a given state system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document