scholarly journals PENERAPAN SISTEM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA BAGI LEMBAGA PERBANKAN DITINJAU DARI TEORI-TEORI SISTEM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-142
Author(s):  
Kristian Kristian
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Culture ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Strict Liability ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
Banking Institutions ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability

The economy of the modern society is closely related or even inseparable with the world of banking. It is due to the fact that the main function of banking institutions is basically as an intermediary. However, the fact that the existence of banking institutions is as a corporation does not always have a positive impact. It can also impact negatively in the sense that the banking institution as a corporation becomes a perpetrator of criminal acts or conducts various criminal acts harmful to the public but untouchable by law.The results show that banking institutions (banks) can be categorized as corporations according to the criminal law. Consequently, as a legal subject, the bank is supposedly liable to commit a criminal offense and may be held accountable for criminal acts. The corporate criminal liability system has been legitimized and justified by several doctrines or theories: identification theory, strict liability theory, vicarious liability doctrine, the corporate culture model or company culture theory, doctrine of aggregation, and reactive corporate fault. If it is related to the subject matter, the corporate criminal liability system, as legitimized and justified by the various theories, can be applied to banking institutions. Hence, according to such theories or doctrines, the bank is deemed able to commit criminal acts and bear criminal liability. In addition, the arrangement and application of corporate criminal liability systems for banking institutions may also be justified by several fundamental or principal reasons.However, it is unfortunate that the system of criminal liability for banking institutions as a corporation is not yet applicable. This is because the current banking law is still dominated by the principle of "societas delinquere non potest" and collided with the principle of legality in criminal law. Thus, to overcome various problems that may arise in the future, the banking law needs to be revised by taking into account several things as described further in this paper. 

Corporate Culpability as a Limit to the Overcriminalization of Corporate Criminal Liability: The Interplay Between Self-Regulation, Corporate Compliance, and Corporate Citizenship

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Gómez-Jara Díez
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Corporate Citizenship ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Due Diligence ◽  
Corporate Compliance ◽  
Clear Sign ◽  
The Times ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability

This paper argues that there is clear sign of the overcriminalization of corporate conduct in America's criminal law and procedure: regardless of the evidence of a law-abiding behavior by a good corporate citizen, the corporation will be considered guilty if a member of its organization commits a crime within the scope of authority and with the intent to benefit the corporation. The paper explains that corporate culpability may function as a limit to this current overcriminalization as it demands in corporate criminal law what is requested in individual criminal law: that despite the agent's action and intent, the principal has not exercised some kind of due diligence. In turn, if evidence of that corporate due diligence is provided, no court should declare that a corporation is guilty. Such an approach is not only consistent with the basic tenets of criminal law, but it also reflects the different rationale for holding corporations criminally liable in modern society (as opposed to the times in which corporate criminal liability was enacted). A recent example of this overcriminalization tendency was provided by the 2nd Circuit's ruling in the case United States v. Ionia Management S.A., which is briefly discussed at the end of the paper.

scholarly journals Criminalizing Corporations In Environmental Crimes

Rechtsidee ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanggup Leonard Agustian ◽  
Fajar Sugianto ◽  
Tomy Michael
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Strict Liability ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Environmental Crimes

The research objective is to find out how criminal law against the environment accommodates criminal acts committed by corporations and to find out the practice of settlement through criminal law instruments in terms of corporate criminal liability in the environmental sector. The research method used is a normative juridical research method. There is the existence of criminal law as a part of 3 law enforcement regimes (state administrative law and civil law). then the involvement of criminal law in the settlement in the environmental sector regulates the existence of corporate criminal liability (business entity) as a subject of criminal law. The corporate criminal responsibility used by the UUPPLH is strict liability according to the law.

scholarly journals Theoretical and Conceptual Reflection Regarding Corporate Criminal Responsibilities Influencing the Formulation of Laws

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Fitriani Rahmadia
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Corporate Responsibility ◽  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability

In Indonesia, the development of the corporation as the subject to criminal acts takes place outside the Criminal Code, regulated in special legislation. While the Criminal Code itself still adheres to the subject of criminal acts in the form of people, the corporation (juridical person) appears as a subject that can commit a crime and should also be accountable in criminal law. However, this condition has not been realized concretely in our Criminal Code. The formulation policy regarding corporate criminal liability for victims of corporate crime that exists or is currently in force has not been able to realize the corporate criminal liability. Although there are sanctions that can be imposed on corporations, most of these provisions only protect potential victims and are not responsible for actual or real victims. In other words, the current formulation policy has not been able to ensnare and impose criminal sanctions on corporations who commit crimes, especially criminal sanctions which are oriented to the fulfillment or restoration of victims' rights in the form of compensation payments after the crime. This paper will discuss the position and the responsibility of the corporation as a subject of criminal law in Indonesia and analyze policy formulation of the Criminal Code and the draft of the Criminal Code that related to corporate responsibility as a legal subject. Keywords: Corporate Criminal Responsibilities, Criminal Law, Corporate Responsibility.

scholarly journals Formulation Policy Regarding the Smuggling of Lobster Seeds in Indonesia

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Ayu Izza Elvany
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Penal Policy ◽  
Illegal Fishing ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability

This paper analyzes how formulation policy of lobster seeds smuggling regulated in Indonesian law to optimize the effectiveness of illegal fishing enforcement, considering penal policy is the basis of criminal law operationalization. This research uses both statute approach and conceptual approach as legal research methods to analyze the issued legal problem. Fishery law in Indonesia regulated in Law No. 45 of 2009 amending Law No. 31 of 2004 concerning Fishery, especially Articles 88 and 16 paragraph (1) which cover the formulation policy of lobster seeds smuggling enforcement. This study will be analyzed into three aspects which are the conduct (the criminal offense), criminal liability, and sentencing system. The result shows that law enforcement regarding the smuggling of lobster seeds in Indonesia is ineffective due to the nonexistence of corporate criminal liability in the fishery law and its sentencing system is lack of both the specific minimum penalty regulation and the penal measures as criminal punishment. However, the draft of the fishery law has already set corporate criminal liability; hence it also regulates the penal measures, in the form of secondary sanctions. Nevertheless, instead of enacting the specific minimum penalty, the draft only determined the maximum penalty as well. Keywords: Formulation Policy, Fishery Law, Lobster Seeds Smuggling.

scholarly journals CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN INDONESIA ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF COMPARISON

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-154
Author(s):  
Muchammad Chasani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Responsibility System

The regulation of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia's criminal justice system is basically a new and still debatable issue. It is said that because in the Criminal Code is not recognized and regulated explicitly about the corporation as a subject of criminal law. This is a natural thing since the WvS Criminal Code still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere non potest" or "non-potest university delinquere", that is, a legal entity can not commit a crime. Thus, if in a society there is a criminal offense, then the criminal act is deemed to be done by the board of the corporation concerned. Regarding the corporate criminal responsibility system in Indonesia, in the corruption law Article 20 paragraph (1), if the corporation committed a criminal act of corruption, then those responsible for the criminal act shall be the corporation only, the management only, or the corporation and its management. Thus, it can be said that the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the legal system in Indonesia is expressly only regulated in special criminal legislation, because the Criminal Code of WvS still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere nonpotest" so it is not possible to enforce corporate criminal liability in it.

4. Negligence and strict liability

2021 ◽  
pp. 126-150
Author(s):  
Michael J. Allen ◽  
Ian Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Strict Liability ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Mens Rea ◽  
The Law ◽  
Sexual Services

Course-focused and contextual, Criminal Law provides a succinct overview of the key areas on the law curriculum balanced with thought-provoking contextual discussion. This chapter discusses the meaning of negligence, arguments for and against negligence as a basis for criminal liability, the meaning of strict liability, the origins of and justifications for strict liability, the presumption of mens rea in offences of strict liability, defences to strict liability, and strict liability and the European Convention on Human Rights. The feaeture ‘The law in context’ examines critically the use of strict liability as the basis for liability in the offence of paying for the sexual services of a person who has been subject to exploitation.

Criminal Law Concentrate

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Herring
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Strict Liability ◽  
Mens Rea ◽  
Sexual Offences ◽  
Essential Information ◽  
Actus Reus ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
The Law

Each Concentrate revision guide is packed with essential information, key cases, revision tips, exam Q&As, and more. Concentrates show you what to expect in a law exam, what examiners are looking for, and how to achieve extra marks. Criminal Law Concentrate covers fundamental principles of this area of law and helps the reader to succeed in exams. Topics covered include the basis of criminal liability, actus reus, mens rea, and strict liability. The chapters also examine offences such as non-fatal offences, sexual offences, homicide, inchoate offences, theft, and fraud. Defences are also examined in the final two chapters. This edition has been updated to include: recent developments in the law and new cases such as Jogee, Conroy, Golds, Ivey, and Joyce; more detail on sexual offences; more revision tips and tables to improve learning; and an ‘Exam essentials’ feature.

Criminal Law Concentrate

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Herring
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Strict Liability ◽  
Mens Rea ◽  
Sexual Offences ◽  
Essential Information ◽  
Actus Reus ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
The Law

Each Concentrate revision guide is packed with essential information, key cases, revision tips, exam Q&As, and more. Concentrates show you what to expect in a law exam, what examiners are looking for, and how to achieve extra marks. Criminal Law Concentrate covers fundamental principles of this area of law and helps the reader to succeed in exams. Topics covered include the basis of criminal liability, actus reus, mens rea, and strict liability. The chapters also examine offences such as non-fatal offences, sexual offences, homicide, inchoate offences, theft, and fraud. Defences are also examined in the final two chapters. This edition has been updated to include: recent developments in the law and new cases such as Jogee, Conroy, Golds, Ivey, and Joyce; more detail on sexual offences; more revision tips and tables to improve learning; and an ‘Exam essentials’ feature.

scholarly journals Corporate Criminal Liability in India

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-48
Author(s):  
Pradeep Kumar Singh
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Strict Liability ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Corporate Body ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability

In 21st Century, crimes committed by corporate bodies are creating more serious challenge for criminal justice system. Some vested interests which are controlling affairs of corporate bodies misuse the corporate body for commission of criminal acts to maximise profit. Corporate body is conferred with legal personality for regulation of its functions but it does not have physical body and mind of its own, thereby, problem arises for holding corporate body as criminal, and further, in imposition of criminal liability. Corporate criminal activities badly affect environment, health, safety and infra-structure development. Corporate entities are involved in corruption, forgery, money laundering, foreign exchange violations, money laundering, tax evasions, benami property transactions and other economic offences. Proper formulation of criminal justice actions and effective enforcement of corporate criminal liabilities are modern criminal justice requirements. Corporate bodies are business entities; economic wellbeing of society, prosperity of citizenry and development of nation depend on freedom of trade, amicable business environment and least regulation of corporate entities. Hereby, in determination and imposition of corporate criminal liability for betterment of society, it is necessary to make balance between to take stern actions to tackle corporate crimes and to take care to not hamper legitimate activities of corporate bodies. Law relating to corporate criminal liability in India will be analysed in this paper. Keywords: Criminal Justice System, Corporate crime, Corporate criminal liability, Natural person, Social wellbeing, Strict liability

scholarly journals Criminal Enforcement Law Policy for Corporate

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinh Thi Mai
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Enforcement Policy ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Enforcement Policies ◽  
Legal Entities

Corporate criminal liability remain a very new issue for Vietnam's criminal justice background. Criminal judgment execution and criminal enforcement policy for corporate in Vietnam are still in the process of formulating and forming policies. Therefore, in this article, we study and discuss four factors that are considered the main pillars of criminal law enforcement policies for criminal, including: (1) Impact object of criminal law enforcement policy on corporate; (2) Object of criminal law enforcement policy for corporate; (3) Subjects of criminal law enforcement policies for corporate legal entities; (4) Forms and measures of criminal law enforcement policy for corporate. Keywords: Criminal law enforcement policy; corporate criminal; impact object; object; subject; form and measure of policy. References: Đỗ Đức Hồng Hà (2019). Nhận diện pháp nhân thương mại trong Luật Thi hành án hình sự (sửa đổi). Hội thảo khoa học về Chính sách pháp luật thi hành án hình sự: Những vấn đề lý luận và thực tiễn cấp bách, Học viện Khoa học xã hội, tháng 4 năm 2019.[2] Đinh Thị Mai (2019). Các yếu tố tác động tới chính sách pháp luật thi hành án hình sự đối với pháp nhân thương mại phạm tội. Hội thảo khoa học Chính sách pháp luật thi hành án hình sự: Những vấn đề lý luận và thực tiễn cấp bách, Học viện Khoa học xã hội, tháng 4 năm 2019.[3] Ngô Đức Minh (2019). Trình tự, thủ tục thi hành án và các biện pháp bảo đảm thi hành án cấm kinh doanh, cấm hoạt động trong một số lĩnh vực đối với pháp nhân thương mại. Phiên tọa đàm về thi hành án hình sự đối với pháp nhân thương mại, ngày 28/2-01/3/2019, Ủy ban tư pháp của Quốc hội.[4] Đậu Anh Tuấn (2019). Cơ quan quản lý nhà nước lĩnh vực hoạt động của pháp nhân thương mại và xác định trách nhiệm của cơ quan quản lý nhà nước trong thi hành án đối với pháp nhân thương mại. Phiên tọa đàm về thi hành án hình sự đối với pháp nhân thương mại, ngày 28/2-01/3/2019, Ủy ban tư pháp của Quốc hội.[5] Quốc hội (2015). Bộ luật Dân sự năm 2015.[6] Quốc hội (2014). Luật Doanh nghiệp năm 2014.[7] Văn phòng Quốc hội (2013). Văn bản hợp nhất Luật Chứng khoán số 27/VBHN-VPQH ngày 18 tháng 12 năm 2013. [8] Văn phòng Quốc hội (2013). Văn bản hợp nhất Luật Kinh doanh bảo hiểm số 12/VBHN-VPQH ngày 23 tháng 7 năm 2013. [9] Văn phòng Quốc hội (2018). Văn bản hợp nhất Luật Đầu tư số 06/VBHN-VPQH ngày 29 tháng 6 năm 2018.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document