scholarly journals Recent Advances in the Prediction of Weld Residual Stress and Distortion - Part 1

2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 151-170
Author(s):  
YU-PING YANG ◽  

Residual stresses and distortions are the result of complex interactions between welding heat input, the material’s high-temperature response, and joint constraint conditions. Both weld residual stress and distortion can significantly impair the performance and reliability of welded structures. In the past two decades, there have been many significant and exciting developments in the prediction and mitigation of weld residual stress and distortion. This paper reviews the recent advances in the prediction of weld residual stress and distortion by focusing on the numerical modeling theory and methods. The prediction methods covered in this paper include a thermo-mechanical-metallurgical method, simplified analysis methods, friction stir welding modeling methods, buckling distortion prediction methods, a welding cloud computational method, integrated manufacturing process modeling, and integrated computational materials engineering (ICME) weld modeling. Remaining challenges and new developments are also discussed to guide future predictions of weld residual stress and distortion.

2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 193-205
Author(s):  
Yu-Ping Yang ◽  

Weld residual stress can contribute to the reduction of structure lifetime and accelerate the formation of fatigue cracks, brittle fractures, or stress corrosion cracking. Distortion can have a significant impact on the dimensional ac-curacy of assembly, structure strength, and fabrication cost. In the past two decades, there have been many significant and exciting developments in the prediction and mitigation of weld residual stress and distortion. This paper reviews the recent advances in mitigation techniques that have been applied in the structure design, manufacturing, and postweld stages. The techniques used in the structure design stage include selecting the type of weld joint and weld groove, using balanced welding, determining appropriate plate thickness and stiffener spacing, and considering distortion compensation. Mitigation techniques used in the manufacturing stage include welding sequence optimization, reducing welding heating input, selecting low-transformation-temperature filler metals, prebending, precambering, constraints, trailing and stationary cooling, in-processing rolling, transient thermal tensioning, and additional heat sources. Postweld mitigation techniques include postweld heating and mechanical treatment. Finally, the remaining challenges and new development needs were discussed to guide future development in the field of mitigating weld residual stress and distortion.


Author(s):  
Peter J. Bouchard ◽  
Lyndon Edwards ◽  
Anastasius G. Youtsos ◽  
Roger Dennis

Finite element weld residual stress modelling procedures involve complex non-linear analyses where many assumptions and approximations have to be made by the analyst. Weld modelling guidelines for inclusion in the R6 defect assessment procedure are in preparation and will be accompanied by a series of validation benchmarks that can be used to evaluate the accuracy of weld modelling procedures and assess their suitability for use in fracture assessments. It is intended to base one of the benchmarks on a stainless steel bead-on-plate weldment that has been extensively studied by members of Task Group 1 of the NeT European Network project. This paper uses round robin residual stress measurements from the NeT project to derive a statistically based ‘best estimate’ distribution of transverse stress passing through the wall-section at mid-length of the bead-on-plate weldment. The accuracy of a state-of-the-art residual stress prediction is benchmarked against the best estimate measurements using a root mean square error analysis and comparisons of decomposed components of stress. The appropriateness of using the predicted residual stresses in fracture assessments is assessed by comparing stress intensity factors based on the measured and predicted distributions of stress. The results from these studies will be used to help establish accuracy targets and acceptance criteria for the welding benchmark.


Author(s):  
Michael L. Benson ◽  
Patrick A. C. Raynaud ◽  
Frederick W. Brust

Residual stress prediction contributes to nuclear safety by enabling engineering estimates of component service lifetimes. Subcritical crack growth mechanisms, in particular, require residual stress assumptions in order to accurately model the degradation phenomena. In many cases encountered in nuclear power plant operations, the component geometry permits two-dimensional (i.e., axisymmetric) modeling. Two recent examples, however, required three-dimensional modeling for a complete understanding of the weld residual stress distribution in the component. This paper describes three-dimensional weld residual stress modeling for two cases: (1) branch connection welds off reactor coolant loop piping and (2) a mockup to demonstrate the effectiveness of the excavate and weld repair process.


Author(s):  
Tao Zhang ◽  
F. W. Brust ◽  
Gery Wilkowski

Weld residual stresses in nuclear power plant can lead to cracking concerns caused by stress corrosion. These are large diameter thick wall pipe and nozzles. Many factors can lead to the development of the weld residual stresses and the distributions of the stress through the wall thickness can vary markedly. Hence, understanding the residual stress distribution is important to evaluate the reliability of pipe and nozzle joints with welds. This paper represents an examination of the weld residual stress distributions which occur in various different size nozzles. The detailed weld residual stress predictions for these nozzles are summarized. Many such weld residual stress solutions have been developed by the authors in the last five years. These distributions will be categorized and organized in this paper and general trends for the causes of the distributions will be established. The residual stress field can therefore feed into a crack growth analysis. The solutions are made using several different constitutive models such as kinematic hardening, isotropic hardening, and mixed hardening model. Necessary fabrication procedures such as repair, overlay and post weld heat treatment are also considered. Some general discussions and comments will conclude the paper.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document