Theological And Ethical Issues Pertaining To Life And Death

Author(s):  
W. Merwin Forbes
1980 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. 581-583
Author(s):  
Ronald Winton ◽  
J. C. Warden ◽  
Steven Lockwood ◽  
Norman Stenhouse ◽  
Robert Hecker ◽  
...  

Thought ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-464
Author(s):  
Stephen Rowntree ◽  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Lucinda April Campbell

<p>In bio-ethics, the potential practical and ethical implications of radical life extension are being seriously debated. However, the role of motivation in relation to dramatically increasing the human life span has been largely overlooked. I propose that motivation is a crucial aspect to consider within the radical life extension discourse by conjecturing about why it might appeal and the possible ways it could impact outcomes where it is successfully developed and implemented. I do not thereby present an argument that supports or opposes radical life extension technology. This is ultimately a speculative piece. In exploring the relationship between motivation and radical life extension, I present a conceptual framework called the Thanatophobic and Romantic Motivational Spectrum (TRM Spectrum) designed to assist deeper examination on the subject. It captures what I suggest are two key motivators related to life and death, that is, the fear of death (Thanatophobia) and the “love” of life (Romanticism). The motivational spectrum is then applied to the death penalty versus life imprisonment, and euthanasia and suicide debates to demonstrate how it can be used for analysis of ethical issues in relation to the potential introduction of radical life extension technology.</p>


FACE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-43
Author(s):  
Christian J. Vercler

The response to the COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated a shift in how we apply the principles of biomedical ethics. The historical foundation of the ethical responsibility of the physician to the patient rests on the of that individual relationship. The patient comes first. However, in a pandemic, a public health ethics takes over, and the focus changes to what each individual member of society’s responsibility is to the collective. The greatest good for the greatest number trumps a given individual’s needs. Ethicists have focused primarily on creating guidelines that apply to allocating scarce life-and-death-determining resources. Very little attention has been paid to scarce resources that are more mundane, such as personal protective equipment (PPE) or operating room (OR) time. I present here a summary of the most recent ethical guidelines for allocation of scarce resources, note some concerns with these approaches, and discuss some of the shortcomings of applying these frameworks to the practice of craniofacial surgeons.


Author(s):  
Yunzhang LIU ◽  
Jinping ZHAO ◽  
Jia XIE

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English.構建中國生命倫理學基本原則所秉持的根本方法應是整合。筆者認為,莊子的生命哲學思想與比徹姆 (Tom L. Beauchamp) 和丘卓斯(James F. Childress) 的生命倫理四原則從不同的角度,為這種整合提供了理論資源。莊子的生命哲學內涵豐富,關注生命本身、關注生命的平等和關注生命存在的本真價值與意義;秉持生是適時,死是順應的自然主義生死觀;追求超越世俗的自由“逍遙”的生存狀態;重視“養生”、“可以盡年”,實踐無慾無為的養生觀;主張“以天地為棺槨”,反對“厚葬”的陋習等等,這些都具有積極意義。這些思想歸結起來就是要“和諧”。和諧是自然萬物的存在秩序,是人的身心健康的根本保障,也是我們在構建中國生命倫理學基本原則時所需要把握的核心價值。而比徹姆和丘卓斯的生命倫理四原則從醫療衞生事業的發展與醫療實踐的角度為我們提供了更清晰、更明確去解決生命倫理問題的原則指導。在此基礎上構建起來的中國生命倫理學基本原則是以“和諧”為中心的體現,在多領域中的原則總體,包括人與自然領域的“和諧生態”原則、人與社會領域的“和諧社會”原則、人與自身領域的“和諧人格”原則、人與醫學領域的“和諧醫學”原則等。運用這些基本原則指導人們的現實倫理生活,規範、分析和解決人們現實生活中存在的種種生命倫理問題,推進社會文明的進步與人類自我價值的提升。The four-principles approach to bioethics developed by Beauchamp and Childress in Principles of Biomedical Ethics is no doubt the most well known and influential example in the West of principle-based approaches to resolve ethical issues. The four principles are autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. This essay explores whether the four principles can be considered a universal core of morality that can be used in China to deal with current bioethical issues. It argues that although the four principles provide general guidelines, their implementation is much more complex. This essay attempts to show that Daoist thought, particularly Zhuangzi’s philosophy of life and death, conveys a certain sense of bioethics and carries profound moral implications that can overcome some of the limitations of principle-based ethics. The synthesis of the two traditions may help contemporary China to deal with various kinds of moral dilemmas. The Daoist notion of the interconnection among human beings and between human beings and nature challenges the Western idea of individualism and individual autonomy.DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 553 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.


Author(s):  
Brian Stanley

This introductory chapter provides an overview of Christianity in the twentieth century. The twentieth century has suffered comparative neglect at the hands of modern Western historians of Christianity, who have, on the whole, remained more interested in the intellectual and social challenges posed to the European churches in the nineteenth century. Yet it was the twentieth century that shaped the contours of the Christian faith as it is now, a culturally plural and geographically polycentric religion clustered around a number of new metropolitan loci in the non-European world. The majority of its rapidly growing number of adherents found the post-Enlightenment questions that preoccupied the churches of the North and West to be remote from their pressing everyday concerns of life and death, sickness and healing, justice and poverty. In Islamic regions of Africa and in almost all of Asia, they were also intimately concerned with the implications of living as religious minorities in a context dominated by the majority religious tradition. Their theological priorities and ethical perspectives differed accordingly from those of Christians in the North. The twentieth century thus set the agenda for the theological and ethical issues that now constitute the fault lines dividing Christians and churches from each other. The twentieth century has thus made it necessary for students of ecumenism to redraw the map of Christian unity and disunity.


1982 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-65
Author(s):  
Richard W. Momeyer ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document