scholarly journals Nitrogen Release Characteristics of a Bag Controlled Release Fertilizer

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Zhong ◽  
Renyi Gui ◽  
Zhuangzhuang Qian ◽  
Shunyao Zhuang
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Ammonia Volatilization ◽  
Slow Release ◽  
Ammonia Emission ◽  
N Leaching ◽  
Nitrogen Release ◽  
N Release ◽  
Slow Release Fertilizers ◽  
Controlled Release Fertilizers

Slow release fertilizers are designed to enhance crop yield and minimizing the loss of nitrogen (N) to environment. However, N release in leaching and loss in ammonia emission from bag controlled release fertilizers have not been previously evaluated under the standardized conditions in soil. Accordingly, a laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the characteristics of N release from a bag controlled fertilizer with 1, 3, 5 and 7 rows of hole (B-1, B-3, B-5, B-7) and a kraft bag without hole (B-W). The results showed that the amount of N leaching of B-1, B-3, B-5, B-7 and B-W were significantly lower than urea fertilizer without bag (U). The maximum N release from the fertilizers followed the order: U (83.16%) > B-7 (54.61%) > B-5 (54.02%) > B-W (51.51%) > B-3 (48.87%) > B-1 (38.60%) during the experimentation. Compared with U treatment, ammonia volatilization losses were significantly decreased by B-1, B-3, B-5, B-7 and B-W treatments. Based on N release and loss, a suitable bag with holes should be considered in practice when using the bag controlled fertilizer to meet an environment good objective. The evaluation method merits further study combined with field experiment.

scholarly journals Nitrogen Release Properties of Controlled-release Fertilizers during Tomato Production

HortScience ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. 1568-1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luther C. Carson ◽  
Monica Ozores-Hampton ◽  
Kelly T. Morgan ◽  
Jerry B. Sartain
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Nonlinear Regression ◽  
Nutrient Release ◽  
Nitrogen Release ◽  
Data Logger ◽  
Tomato Crop ◽  
Tomato Production ◽  
N Release ◽  
Soil Temperatures ◽  
Controlled Release Fertilizers

Determination of nutrient release duration from controlled-release fertilizers (CRFs) or soluble fertilizers encapsulated in polymer, resin, or sulfur covered fertilizer coated with a polymer differs among manufacturers, but may be determined as 75% to 80% nitrogen (N) release at a constant temperature (e.g., 20 to 25 °C). Increases or decreases in temperature compared with the manufacturer release determination temperature increase or decrease CRF N release; thus, coated fertilizer may release more rapidly than stated during the fall season when soil temperatures in seepage-irrigated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) production can reach 40.1 °C. The objectives of this study were to evaluate N release duration of CRFs by measuring N release from CRFs incubated in pouches under polyethylene mulch-covered raised beds and to determine the CRF duration suitable for incorporation into a fall tomato fertility program. In 2011 and 2013, 12 and 14 CRFs from Agrium Advanced Technologies, Everris, Florikan, and Chisso-Asahi Fertilizer were sealed in fiberglass mesh pouches (12.7 × 14 cm) that were buried 10 cm below the bed surface in a tomato crop grown using commercial production practices. A data logger collected soil temperature 10 cm below the bed surface. Pouches were collected and N content was measured eight times through two fall seasons. A nonlinear regression model was fit to the data to determine N release rate. During the 2011 and 2013 seasons, minimum, average, and maximum soil temperatures were 21.2 and 19.2, 25.7 and 23.5, and 32.2 and 27.7 °C, respectively. Seasonal total CRF N release was between 77.6% and 93.8% during 2011 and 58.3% and 94.3% in 2013. In 2011, PCU90 and in 2013, PCU90 and PCNPK120 had the highest seasonal total percentage N release (PNR) and FL180 had the lowest in both years. A nonlinear regression fit N release from CRF with R2 = 0.85 to 0.99 during 2011 and 0.49 to 0.99 during 2013. Nitrogen release from all CRFs was faster than the manufacturer’s stated release, probably as a result of high fall bed temperatures. A CRF or CRF mixture containing CRFs of 120- to 180-day release duration may be recommended, but the CRFs must release greater than 75% N during the season.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Nitrogen Release Patterns from Controlled-release Fertilizers by Nitrogen Leaching Analysis

HortScience ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul I. Cabrera
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Experimental Period ◽  
N Leaching ◽  
N Losses ◽  
Ambient Temperatures ◽  
Average Maximum ◽  
N Release ◽  
Fast Start ◽  
Controlled Release Fertilizers ◽  
Leaching Pattern

Seven nursery grade (8-9 month duration), polymer-coated, controlled-release fertilizers (CRF) were topdressed or incorporated into a 2 peat: 1 vermiculite: 1 sand (by volume) medium to yield the same amount of N per container. The pots (0.5 L) were uniformly irrigated with DI water every week to produce a target leaching fraction of 25%. Leachate N contents (ammonium plus nitrate), employed as indicators of N release, allowed for comparison of CRF performance as a function of temperature changes over a season. Two distinct N leaching (i.e., release) patterns were observed over the 180-day experimental period. The fertilizers Osmocote 18-6-12FS (Fast Start: OSM-FS), Prokote Plus 20-3-10 (PROK), Osmocote 24-4-8HN (High N: OSM-HN) and Polyon 25-4-12 (POLY) exhibited a N leaching pattern that closely followed changes in average daily ambient temperatures (Tavg) over the season. This relationship was curvilinear, with N leaching rates per pot (NLR) being highly responsive to Tavg changes between 20 and 25 °C. Temperatures above 25 °C produced an average maximum NLR of 1.27 mg·d-1 for these fertilizers. OSM-FS, PROK, and OSM-HN had the highest cumulative N losses over the experimental period. In contrast, the CRF group formed by Nutricote 18-6-8 (270: NUTR), Woodace 20-4-12 (WDC), and Osmocote 18-6-12 (OSM) showed a more stable N leaching pattern over a wider range of temperatures, with rates about 30% to 40% lower than those in the temperature-responsive CRF, and averaging a maximum NLR of 0.79 mg·d-1 for Tavg >25 °C. NUTR and WDC had the lowest cumulative N losses over the season. Soluble salt readings paralleled N leaching for each CRF, indicating similar leaching patterns for other nutrients. Incorporation produced significantly higher cumulative N losses than topdressing, but without effect on the actual N leaching pattern over the season. Regardless of the N formulation in the CRF, over 85% of the N recovered in the leachates was in the nitrate form.

scholarly journals Nitrogen Release Characteristics from Controlled-release Fertilizers

HortScience ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 606f-606
Author(s):  
Raul I. Cabrera
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Nitrate Concentration ◽  
Nitrogen Release ◽  
Ambient Temperatures ◽  
Temperature Responsive ◽  
N Release ◽  
Controlled Release Fertilizers ◽  
Grade 8

Seven nursery grade (8- to 9-month duration), polymer-coated, controlled-release fertilizers (CRF) were topdressed or incorporated to a peat: sand: vermiculite medium to yield the same amount of N per container. The pots were uniformly irrigated with DI water every week. Leachates were collected and analyzed for N (ammonium plus nitrate) concentration. Two distinct N release (NR) patterns were observed over the 180-day experiment. Osmocote 18–6–12FS, Prokote-P 20–3–10, Osmocote 24–4–8HN, and Polyon 25–4–12 exhibited a NR pattern that closely followed changes in average daily ambient temperatures (AT) over the season. This relationship was curvilinear in nature, with NR being highly responsive to AT up to 25°C. Conversely, Osmocote 18–6–12, Nutricote 18–6–8 (270), and Woodace 20–4–12 showed a stable NR pattern over a wider range of AT, with NR rates 30% to 60% lower than those in the temperature-responsive CRF. Incorporation produced significantly higher cumulative N releases than topdressing but without effect on the actual pattern of NR over the season. Regardless of the N formulation in the CRF, >80% of the N recovered in the leachates was in the nitrate form.

Optimization and Validation of an Accelerated Laboratory Extraction Method to Estimate Nitrogen Release Patterns of Slow- and Controlled-Release Fertilizers

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Carolina Medina ◽  
Jerry B Sartain ◽  
Thomas A Obreza ◽  
William L Hall ◽  
Nancy J Thiex
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Extraction Method ◽  
Nutrient Release ◽  
Portion Size ◽  
Effect Of Temperature ◽  
Extraction Temperature ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
N Release ◽  
Slow Release Fertilizers ◽  
Controlled Release Fertilizers

Abstract Several technologies have been proposed to characterize the nutrient release and availability patterns of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers (EEFs), especially slow-release fertilizers (SRFs) and controlled-release fertilizers (CRFs) during the last few decades. These technologies have been developed mainly by manufacturers and are product-specific based on the regulation and analysis of each EEF product. Despite previous efforts to characterize EEF materials, no validated method exists to assess their nutrient release patterns. However, the increased use of EEFs in specialty and nonspecialty markets requires an appropriate method to verify nutrient claims and material performance. A series of experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of temperature, fertilizer test portion size, and extraction time on the performance of a 74 h accelerated laboratory extraction method to measure SRF and CRF nutrient release profiles. Temperature was the only factor that influenced nutrient release rate, with a highly marked effect for phosphorus and to a lesser extent for nitrogen (N) and potassium. Based on the results, the optimal extraction temperature set was: Extraction No. 1—2:00 h at 25°C; Extraction No. 2—2:00 h at 50°C; Extraction No. 3—20:00 h at 55°C; and Extraction No. 4—50:00 h at 60°C. Ruggedness of the method was tested by evaluating the effect of small changes in seven selected factors on method behavior using a fractional multifactorial design. Overall, the method showed ruggedness for measuring N release rates of coated CRFs.

Evaluation of a Soil Incubation Method to Characterize Nitrogen Release Patterns of Slow- and Controlled-Release Fertilizers

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 643-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Carolina Medina ◽  
Jerry B Sartain ◽  
Thomas A Obreza ◽  
William L Hall ◽  
Nancy J Thiex
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Release Rate ◽  
Nutrient Release ◽  
Soil Incubation ◽  
Release Rates ◽  
N Release ◽  
Production And Distribution ◽  
Slow Release Fertilizers ◽  
Incubation Temperatures ◽  
Controlled Release Fertilizers

Abstract Several technologies have been proposed to characterize the nutrient release patterns of slow- release fertilizers (SRF) and controlled-release fertilizers (CRF) during the last few decades. These technologies have been developed mainly by manufacturers, and are product-specific, based on the regulation and analysis of each SRF and CRF product. Despite previous efforts to characterize SRF and CRF materials, no standardized, validated method exists to assess their nutrient release patterns. However, the increased production and distribution of these materials in specialty and nonspecialty markets requires an appropriate method to verify product claims and material performance. A soil incubation column leaching procedure was evaluated to determine its suitability as a standard method to estimate nitrogen (N) release patterns of SRFs and CRFs during 180 days. The influence of three soil/sand ratios, three incubation temperatures, and four soils on method behavior was assessed using five SRFs and three CRFs. In general, the highest soil/sand ratio increased the N release rate of all materials, but this effect was more marked for the SRFs. Temperature had the greatest influence on N release rates. For CRFs, the initial N release rates and the percentage N released/day increased as temperature increased. For SRFs, raising the temperature from 25 to 35°C increased initial N release rate and the total cumulative N released, and almost doubled the percentage released/day. The percentage N released/day from all products generally increased as the texture of the soil changed from sandy to loamy (Iowa>California>Pennsylvania>Florida). The soil incubation technique was demonstrated to be robust and reliable for characterizing N release patterns from SRFs and CRFs. The method was reproducible, and variations in soil/sand ratio, temperature, and soil had little effect on the results.

scholarly journals Preparation and properties of hydrogel based on sawdust cellulose for environmentally friendly slow release fertilizers

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Zhang ◽  
Yanlu Liu ◽  
Panfang Lu ◽  
Min Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Slow Release ◽  
Environmentally Friendly ◽  
Water Absorbency ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Structure And Properties ◽  
Nitrogen Release ◽  
Release Property ◽  
Slow Release Fertilizers ◽  
Grafting Copolymerization ◽  
Cross Linker

AbstractA novel hydrogel slow-release nitrogen fertilizer based on sawdust with water absorbency was prepared using grafting copolymerization. Urea was incorporated as nitrogen source in a hydrogel fertilizer. Potassium persulfate (KPS) and N,N᾽-methylenebis acrylamide (MBA) were used as the initiator and cross-linker, respectively. The structure and properties of the samples were characterized by XPS, EDS, SEM, XRD and FTIR. The effects of various salt solutions, ionic strength and pH on swelling behavior were discussed. The results showed that the largest water absorbency of the sample reached 210 g/g in distilled water. In addition, the sample had the good nitrogen release property. Thus, the novel environmentally friendly hydrogel fertilizer may be widely applied to agricultural and horticultural fields.

Environmentally Friendly Slow Release Nano-Chemicals in Agriculture

2019 ◽  
pp. 220-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richa Kothari ◽  
Khursheed Ahmad Wani
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Sustainable Agriculture ◽  
Nutrient Uptake ◽  
Crop Yield ◽  
Slow Release ◽  
Environmentally Friendly ◽  
Slow Discharge ◽  
The World ◽  
Growing Population ◽  
Controlled Release Fertilizers

Agriculture is important for people all over the world in order to obtain food to sustain the ever-growing population. However, the current practices for obtaining more and more food has several environmental challenges. Hence, new environmentally friendly fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides have been developed that enhance crop yield by facilitating maximum nutrient uptake by the application of nanotechnology that will help in promoting sustainable agriculture by the slow or controlled release fertilizers. This slow discharge encourages improved delivery of nutrients to the plants that further speeds up early germination, fast growth, and high nutritional level. The current study is aimed to review nano-chemicals used in agriculture that have been developed by the researchers all over the world.

The Effect of pH in the Tap Water on Nutrient Release from Slow Release Fertilizers

2014 ◽  
Vol 931-932 ◽  
pp. 754-757
Author(s):  
Jittrera Buates ◽  
Petchporn Chawakitchareon ◽  
Rewadee Anuwattana
Keyword(s):  
Slow Release ◽  
Tap Water ◽  
Nutrient Release ◽  
Release Behavior ◽  
Release Formulation ◽  
Total N ◽  
Nutrient Contents ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
N Release ◽  
Slow Release Fertilizers

The objective of this research is to study the nutrient release behaviors on slow release fertilizer (Osmocote® N13:P13:K13, 3 month release formulation). The fertilizer was added into distilled water which adjusted pH of 6.5 and 7.5. The nutrient release behaviors were determined by collecting samples every 1 week and analyzed the nutrient contents in samples by scientific methods. As the result, for the total N release behavior, it may be considered that at lower pH condition tended to release more than that at higher one, for the P (shown by P2O5) and K (shown by K2O) release behaviors may be high at high pH condition.

scholarly journals Ammonia volatilization from enhanced-efficiency urea on no-till maize in brazilian cerrado with improved soil fertility

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Lopes Cancellier ◽  
Douglas Ramos Guelfi Silva ◽  
Valdemar Faquin ◽  
Bruno de Almeida Gonçalves ◽  
Leandro Lopes Cancellier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Ammonia Volatilization ◽  
Slow Release ◽  
Urease Inhibitors ◽  
N Accumulation ◽  
Nitrogen Use ◽  
No Till ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Slow Release Urea ◽  
Controlled Release Urea

ABSTRACT High nitrogen losses by ammonia volatilization are expected when urea is used as the source of N. The use of controlled-release urea and urease inhibitors are possible strategies to reduce such losses and increase nitrogen use efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate nitrogen losses by ammonia volatilization from stabilized, slow and controlled release urea and its absorption by maize grown under no-till in an improved Cerrado soil. Four N sources were used: conventional urea, urea + N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT), urea + Cu and B and urea coated by sulfur + polymers. These N sources were surface applied along the rows using three N doses of 100, 150 and 200 kg ha-1. No N was added to the control. Data were collected regarding N losses by volatilization, the N contents accumulated in the stubble and grains, and the yields of the stubble and grains. Stabilized urea and slow release urea were efficient for postponing the ammonia volatilization peaks. The urease inhibitors postponed the peaks for up to two days, reducing the accumulated volatilization by 18% when compared with common urea. Polymer sulfur coated urea resulted in a 37% reduction in ammonia volatilization. Increasing the N application rate to 200 kg ha-1 resulted in 16% greater yields and 37% greater N accumulation in the plants relative to the control. However, the stabilized and slow-release urea did not improve the N accumulation or yield. Consequently, the nitrogen use efficiency of maize was not improved relative to the use of conventional urea.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document