REVISING THE INTERPRETATION OF COMPLEX CARBONATE RESERVOIRS WITH THE USE OF NOVEL ADVANCED LOGS INTEGRATION TECHNIQUES

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harish B. Datir ◽  
◽  
Laurent Mosse ◽  
Terje Kollien ◽  
◽  
...  

The Alta field in the Barents Sea was discovered in 2014. The reservoir formation is primarily carbonate rocks with high formation water salinity. Extensive waterflooding processes have led to an approximately 200-m rise of water level. The complexities anduncertainties regarding imbibition, current free waterlevel, and pseudo fluid contacts within the field translateinto uncertainty in the hydrocarbon volume estimation. Initial, triple-combo-based petrophysical evaluations have already been updated using advanced log measurements, as reported in an earlier publication. The evaluation is now consolidated by using two new techniques relying on advanced spectroscopy logging and combination with dielectric dispersion logging. Their objective is to further reduce the uncertainty in water saturation associated with variable apparent water salinity. The present contribution proposes a workflow that relies on two novel techniques. The first technique is a direct quantitative measurement of formation chlorine concentration from nuclear spectroscopy, which helps resolve the formation's apparent water salinity and provides a way to calibrate formation matrix sigma. The second technique relies on the existing combined inversion of dielectric dispersion and formation sigma, including explicitly invasion effects. This second technique benefits from the first technique's insight to adjust sigma interpretation and provide bounds for possible salinity variations. The workflow provides robust flushed and unflushed zone salinities, here the most uncertain and variable parameter, combined with accurate estimations of virgin and residual hydrocarbon saturations. The quantification of dielectric textural parameters describing how the water is shaped inside the formation is also improved, contributing to the improvement of virgin zone hydrocarbon saturation estimation.

Author(s):  
Jeffrey Miles ◽  
◽  
Laurent Mossé ◽  
Jim Grau ◽  
◽  
...  

Many methods of calculating water saturation require knowing the chloride concentration in formation water. Chlorides have a strong effect on water properties, and they impact saturation estimates that are based on resistivity, dielectric dispersion, or thermal neutron absorption. Here we introduce a new direct quantitative measurement of formation chlorine from nuclear spectroscopy, enabling a continuous log of water salinity within a limited radial depth. Neutron capture spectroscopy is sensitive to chlorine and is a natural fit for measuring its concentration, except that the spectrum contains chlorine from both the formation and borehole. The borehole chlorine background can be large and is highly variable. Historical efforts to derive water salinity from spectroscopy have relied on ratios of chlorine and hydrogen, which are affected by the borehole and hydrocarbons. The direct use of chlorine provides a more reliable basis for salinity interpretation after isolating its formation signal. We partition the borehole and formation components of chlorine via two unique spectral standards. The contrast between the two standards arises from differences in gamma ray scattering based on their point of origin. The shape of the borehole chlorine standard must be adjusted along depth to account for environmentally dependent scattering, which we achieve with a continuously varying function of borehole and formation properties. The algorithm is derived from 129 laboratory measurements and 2,995 numerical simulations spanning a diverse range of conditions. The remaining signal is converted into a log of formation chlorine concentration. In combination with total porosity, chlorine concentration sets a minimum value for water salinity. Adding an organic carbon measurement enables the simultaneous estimation of water volume and salinity. Chlorine concentration can also be combined with a selected water salinity to compute a water volume for comparison with other methods. Finally, chlorine concentration enables calculation of a maximum expected sigma, which can identify the presence of excess thermal absorbers in the matrix. The systematic uncertainty on the chlorine concentration ranges from 0.03 to 0.07 wt%, depending on borehole size. The resulting salinity accuracy is inversely proportional to porosity. A potential limitation of the measurement is its depth of investigation, reaching 8 to 10 in. for 90% of the signal. The chlorine concentration is sensitive to filtrate or connate water, depending on formation permeability and invading fluids. We first present the technique to measure formation chlorine, supported by modeling, laboratory data, and core-log comparisons. We then propose petrophysical workflows to interpret the chlorine concentration.


1986 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 242 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Kuttan ◽  
J.B. Kulla ◽  
R.G Neumann

The recognition and quantitative evaluation of hydrocarbon zones in the Gippsland Basin is complicated by the presence of a freshwater aquifer system. This aquifer system has been verified and documented using data obtained from wireline logs. The presence of freshwater aquifers below the hydrocarbon sands leads to (i) difficulty in distinguishing the hydrocarbon zones from the water sands using well logs, and (ii) difficulty in determining accurate water saturation values used in estimating hydrocarbon volumes.Water saturations calculated from logs require the input of a formation water salinity. In conventional log analysis the formation water salinity in the hydrocarbon zones is assumed to be the same as that of the underlying water sands. In reservoirs in the Gippsland Basin underlain by freshwater aquifers, calculated water saturations using the salinities of the water sands are inconsistent with capillary pressure, Repeat Formation Tester (RFT*-Schlumberger), and production test data. All available evidence suggests that the formation water salinities within the hydrocarbon zones are significantly greater than in the freshwater aquifers. The water saturations derived using the higher salinity values lead to the calculation of greater hydrocarbon volumes.The occurrence of saline formation waters within the hydrocarbon zones leads to the interpretation that significant volumes of hydrocarbon were emplaced prior to the formation of the freshwater aquifer system. Subsequent freshwater influx did not flush the emplaced hydrocarbons.


2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 744
Author(s):  
Roger Marsh ◽  
Rafay Ansari ◽  
David Chace ◽  
Keith Boyle

Traditionally, pulsed neutron data has been used to calculate water saturation and/or monitor gas/water contacts in zones of high formation water salinity. In low or unknown salinities carbon/oxygen measurements have been used for oil saturation measurements in porosities greater than 15%. In tight gas sands, porosities are typically less than 10% and are too low for either method to work. In gas sands with low or unknown water salinities and porosities below 15%, neither Sigma or C/O measurements will work. New pulsed neutron instrumentation and methodology are available for through-casing gas saturation measurements. The new technology is independent of water salinity and enables gas saturation calculations to be made in porosities as low as 5%. The technique includes modelling that enables the tool response to be determined in advance. Modelling takes into account several factors, including: lithology, completion geometry, reservoir pressure, gas density, and gas composition (for example: methane or CO2). The measurements are sensitive to gas pressure in the reservoir, and this paper will discuss ways that the data can be used to infer the relative and, in some cases, absolute pressures of different zones. The data set presented straddles the gas/water contact in the borehole. The effects of re-invasion by the borehole fluids will be discussed with respect to the corresponding openhole and cased hole water saturations, from both inelastic and capture measurements.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (19) ◽  
pp. 6335
Author(s):  
Yufei Yang ◽  
Kesai Li ◽  
Yuanyuan Wang ◽  
Hucheng Deng ◽  
Jianhua He ◽  
...  

It is generally difficult to identify fluid types in low-porosity and low-permeability reservoirs, and the Chang 8 Member in the Ordos Basin is a typical example. In the Chang 8 Member of Yanchang Formation in the Zhenyuan area of Ordos Basin, affected by lithology and physical properties, the resistivity of the oil layer and water layer are close, which brings great difficulties to fluid type identification. In this paper, we first analyzed the geological and petrophysical characteristics of the study area, and found that high clay content is one of the reasons for the low-resistivity oil pay layer. Then, the formation water types and characteristics of formation water salinity were studied. The water type was mainly CaCl2, and formation water salinity had a great difference in the study area ranging from 7510 ppm to 72,590 ppm, which is the main cause of the low-resistivity oil pay layer. According to the reservoir fluid logging response characteristics, the water saturation boundary of the oil layer, oil–water layer and water layer were determined to be 30%, 65% and 80%, respectively. We modified the traditional resistivity–porosity cross plot method based on Archie’s equations, and established three basic plates with variable formation water salinity, respectively. The above method was used to identify the fluid types of the reservoirs, and the application results indicate that the modified method agrees well with the perforation test data, which can effectively improve the accuracy of fluid identification. The accuracy of the plate is 88.1%. The findings of this study can help for a better understanding of fluid identification and formation evaluation.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Tian ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
Quanying Zhang ◽  
Qian Chen ◽  
Xinguang Wang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Muhammad Khan Memon ◽  
Ubedullah Ansari ◽  
Habib U Zaman Memon

In the surfactant alternating gas injection, the injected surfactant slug is remained several days under reservoir temperature and salinity conditions. As reservoir temperature is always greater than surface temperature. Therefore, thermal stability of selected surfactants use in the oil industry is almost important for achieving their long-term efficiency. The study deals with the screening of individual and blended surfactants for the applications of enhanced oil recovery that control the gas mobility during the surfactant alternating gas injection. The objective is to check the surfactant compatibility in the presence of formation water under reservoir temperature of 90oC and 120oC. The effects of temperature and salinity on used surfactant solutions were investigated. Anionic surfactant Alpha Olefin Sulfonate (AOSC14-16) and Internal Olefin Sulfonate (IOSC15-18) were selected as primary surfactants. Thermal stability test of AOSC14-16 with different formation water salinity was tested at 90oC and 120oC. Experimental result shows that, no precipitation was observed by surfactant AOSC14-16 when tested with different salinity at 90oC and 120oC. Addition of amphoteric surfactant Lauramidopropylamide Oxide (LMDO) with AOSC14-16 improves the stability in the high percentage of salinity at same temperature, whereas, the surfactant blend of IOSC15-18 and Alcohol Aloxy Sulphate (AAS) was resulted unstable. The solubility and chemical stability at high temperature and high salinity condition is improved by the blend of AOSC14-16+LMDO surfactant solution. This blend of surfactant solution will help for generating stable foam for gas mobility control in the methods of chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR).


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler Gilkerson ◽  
◽  
Jack C. Pashin ◽  
Tracy M. Quan ◽  
Thomas H. Darrah ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document