scholarly journals As unidades pliocénicas e quaternárias no espaço do Baixo Mondego (uma perspectiva de ordem)

Author(s):  
António Ferreira Soares

Pliocene and Quaternary Units in the Lower Mondego (Portugal) — The analysis of the relations betweenthe quaternary deposits in the Baixo Mondego, as well as their individualisation from others considered asPliocene, still suffer from insufficient reference marks necessary to guarantee equivalencies. The limitis now considered to be in the concert of the Cruz de Morouços Complex, where the Antanhol Formation(= Barracão Group, Upper Pliocene) and the Espírito Santo Conglomerate, equivalent to the GordosConglomerate (Lower Pleistocene), succeed to each other. From the Pleistocene assemblage andbeside the deposits directly associated to the evolution of Mondego (Ameal-Santo Varão and Tentugal-Gabrielos deposits), the deposits revealing upper littoral environments stand out, as the ArazedeSandstone, the Quiaios Sandstone, others deposits directly related with the Cabo Mondego morphogenesis,the Farol Deposits, fossiliferous and possibly from the Lower to Middle Pleistocene and theMurtinheira Deposits from the Upper Pleistocene. In turn the Condeixa Tuffs, with an accommodationspace of 24 Km2 , show an ordered succession of facies (Conglomerates — Cg; yellow mud — Pa, tuffs— Ta and Tc; grey mud with Lymnea — Pc) and an extended age from the Pleistocene (with Elephasantiquus and Hippopotamus incognitus in the base) possibly around the 400 Ka, to the Holocene (faciesPc with roman archaeological remains).

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Head ◽  
Philip L. Gibbard ◽  
Jan Zalasiewicz

<p>The Holocene and Pleistocene series/epochs have each long been divided into Early, Middle and Late subseries/subepochs, although their formalization had been complicated by the hitherto absence of this rank from the International Chronostratigraphic Chart.  On 14th June 2018, the Holocene was formally subdivided into the Greenlandian, Northgrippian and Meghalayan stages/ages and their corresponding Lower/Early, Middle, Upper/Late subseries/subepochs, each defined by a Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP). The GSSP for the lowermost stage, the Greenlandian, is that of the Holocene as previously defined in the NGRIP2 Greenland ice core, and dated at 11,700 yr b2k (before 2000 CE). The GSSP for the Northgrippian is in the NGRIP1 Greenland ice core, and dated at 8236 yr b2k, whereas that for the Meghalayan is located in a speleothem from Mawmluh Cave, Meghalaya, northeast India with a date of 4250 yr b2k (Walker et al., 2018).  The Pleistocene Series/Epoch of the Quaternary System/Period has been divided unofficially into three subseries/subepochs since at least the 1870s.  On 30th January 2020, two proposals were ratified: 1) the Lower Pleistocene Subseries, comprising the Gelasian Stage and the superjacent Calabrian Stage, with a base defined by the GSSP for the Gelasian Stage, the Pleistocene Series, and the Quaternary System, and currently dated at 2.58 Ma; and 2) the term Upper Pleistocene, at the rank of subseries, with a base currently undefined but provisionally dated at ~129 ka.  The Middle Pleistocene and its corresponding Chibanian Stage/Age had meanwhile been formalized on January 17, 2020 with a GSSP in the Chiba section, Japan.  The GSSP is placed 1.1 m below the directional midpoint of the Matuyama–Brunhes Chron boundary, at the base of a regional lithostratigraphic marker, the Ontake-Byakubi-E tephra bed, in the Chiba section. The GSSP has an astronomical age of 774.1 ka and is placed just below the top of Marine Isotope Substage 19c.  These ratifications nominally complete the official division of the Quaternary into subseries/subepochs, although the Upper Pleistocene and its corresponding stage remain to be defined by GSSP.  The Anthropocene is currently an unofficial unit, while analysis of potential candidate GSSP locations is progressing in preparation for a formalization proposal.  If approved, it would terminate the Holocene at around the year 1952, assuming it is defined at series/epoch rank.</p><p>Head, M.J., Pillans, B., and Zalasiewicz, J.A., in press. Formal ratification of subseries/subepochs for the Pleistocene Series/Epoch of the Quaternary System/Period. Episodes</p><p>Suganuma, Y., Okada, M., Head, M.J., et al., in press. Formal ratification of the Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Chibanian Stage and Middle Pleistocene Subseries of the Quaternary System: the Chiba Section, Japan.  Episodes</p><p>Walker, M., Head, M.J., Berkelhammer, M. et al., 2018.  Formal ratification of the subdivision of the Holocene Series/Epoch (Quaternary System/Period): two new Global Boundary Stratotype Sections and Points (GSSPs) and three new stages/subseries. Episodes 41(4): 213–223. </p>


Radiocarbon ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1087-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex da Silva de Freitas ◽  
Cintia Ferreira Barreto ◽  
Alex Cardoso Bastos ◽  
José Antônio Baptista Neto

AbstractVitória Bay is located in the south-central part of the State of Espírito Santo (SES). Multiproxy analyses were performed on samples from a 490-cm-long sediment core collected at the coordinates 40°18′23′′W and 20°14′48′′S. The objective of this study was to identify and integrate the multiproxy data to determine the environmental dynamics during the Holocene. The material was subsampled every 10 m and submitted to standard methodological processing. The sediment core was dated to two depths: the oldest age was between 9396 and 9520 cal yr BP at a 480-cm depth, and the youngest age was from 7423 to 7511 cal yr BP at a 304-cm depth. The integrated analysis revealed evidence of three major environmental changes in Vitória Bay. The first phase had a fluvial influence (depth of 490–480 cm; 9396–9520 cal yr BP). This was followed by a transitional period (depth of 480–290 cm; 7423–7511 cal yr BP) with a salt influence due to the Last Marine Transgression (LMT). Later, the environmental stability was similar to that of today (290 cm to the core top). This was a reflection of the Last Marine Regression (LMR) in the Holocene.


Palynology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-393
Author(s):  
Alex da Silva de Freitas ◽  
Cintia Ferreira Barreto ◽  
Alex Cardoso Bastos ◽  
José Antônio Baptista Neto

2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 84-95
Author(s):  
Brigitte Urban

Abstract. Only a few Quaternary deposits of the periglacial area in Germany can be described in paleoecological or palynological - and therefore climatostratigraphical - terms. This paper provides a supplementary description of the most important (bio)stratigraphical terms relating to the warm and cold stages of the Lower and Middle Pleistocene, especially those allowing correlations with the glaciated regions of northern and southern Germany (e.g. in STEPHAN & MENKE 1993; Litt et al., this volume). The chronostratigraphical subdivision into Lower, Middle and Upper Pleistocene is based on the Stratigraphical Table of Germany 2002 (STD 2002) and on the climatostratigraphical regional division into cold and warm stages for continental northwestern Europe and Germany (LITT et al. 2005), which follows the traditional positioning of the Pliocene/Pleistocene boundary at the transition between the Reuverian and Pretiglian stages (Zagwijn 1960). According to international agreement on the location of the GSSP at Vrica (Italy), the sections of the Pretiglian stage and the Tiglian Complex belong to the Gelasian, which is still assigned to the Pliocene. The Gelasian/Calabrian boundary was set at about 1.8 million years at the Vrica section at the top of the Olduvai magnetozone and therefore represents the internationally agreed base of the Pleistocene. The practical value of this boundary – which does not take prior major climatic events into account – has been a matter of controversy. By international consensus, the boundary between the Lower and Middle Pleistocene has been set at the palaeomagnetically defined Brunhes/Matuyama boundary at 780 ka; the Upper Pleistocene begins with the last interglacial, the Eemian stage (MIS 5e).


2000 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 111-134
Author(s):  
O. Bennike ◽  
S. Björck ◽  
J. Böcher ◽  
I. R. Walker

Arthropod fossils from Quaternary deposits in Greenland are considered. The few occurrences of Early and Middle Pleistocene age have yielded only three species of barnacles. This contrasts sharply with the last interglacial stage which is represented by many sites, from which a range of marine, lacustrine and terrestrial crustaceans and insects are reported. The only secure late glacial sediments from Greenland are found in the far south, and only a few taxa of arthropods have so far been identified from these. The best dated and richest faunas come from the Holocene. Most records of insects are from the late Holocene, but there are also a number of finds from the early and mid Holocene. Arthropods are considered good palaeoclimate indicators, because they are generally dispersed quicker, for example, than vascular plants. This group of animals is also highly useful for reconstructing former ecological conditions, because they occupy such a wide range of biotopes. A total of about 105 taxa have been reported so far, but several groups of arthropods, such as marine ostracodes, chironomids and oribatids, have received little attention, and many more taxa can be expected when these groups are being studied in the future.


2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 832-837
Author(s):  
Rafaela Alves Pereira-Silva ◽  
Sarah Maria Athiê-Souza ◽  
André Laurênio de Melo ◽  
W. Scott Armbruster

Abstract—A new species of Dalechampia from southeastern Brazil, belonging to Dalechampia sect. Dioscoreifoliae, is described and illustrated here. Dalechampia margarethiae is a twining vine occurring exclusively in Espírito Santo state. Its pseudanthia are similar to those of D. peckoltiana and D. pentaphylla, but D. margarethiae differs in a set of important characters, including having cylindrical, down-curved style tips, staminate flowers at anthesis having unreflexed sepals with stamens born on unelongated columns, whitish floral resin, and simple, entire, cordate leaves.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anselmo Hudson Siqueira Nascimento ◽  
Riberti de Almeida Felisbino ◽  
Danilo Roberto Pereira Santiago

1969 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-300
Author(s):  
Meri Nádia Marques Gerlin ◽  
Elmira Luzia Melo Soares Simeão

A capacidade de o narrador estabelecer relações com outros sujeitos ao mesmo tempo em que busca, recupera e produz informações, conduz ao aperfeiçoamento do aprendizado de como acessar, avaliar e usar informações específicas de sua área de atuação. Com isso, procede-se a apresentação do objetivo de uma pesquisa que procura identificar as competências em informação que os contadores de histórias contemporâneos possuem e aquelas que são necessárias para uma conexão em redes colaborativas, potencializadas ou não pelas tecnologias de informação e comunicação. Todavia, acredita-se que o domínio das redes digitais se apresenta como um desafio para os atores culturais que durante décadas dominam os mecanismos da comunicação interpessoal. Desenvolvida no âmbito do Doutorado Interinstitucional em Ciência da Informação da Universidade de Brasília e Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, a pesquisa qualitativa e quantitativa utiliza indicadores de perfil e contexto agrupados em um questionário com a finalidade de identificar competências em informação dos narradores do Distrito Federal. A necessidade de sustentar a atividade dos contadores de histórias perpassa as redes desenhadas na contemporaneidade, o que vai de encontro com uma atuação isolada que não possibilita o compartilhamento das experiências que comumente por eles são vividas. Assim sendo, esses narradores devem adquirir habilidades que os conduzam a produção de conteúdos necessários para acessar e produzir informação na sociedade em que vivem. Também necessitam de uma mudança de foco, de entendimento e de aceitação de outras perspectivas de aprendizado perante o acesso de redes de colaboração digitais e presenciais, para, assim, fazer fluir uma conexão interativa que permita o compartilhamento de informações na sociedade da informação.


Author(s):  
João Paulo Pandini ◽  
Bianca Bortolini Merlo ◽  
Josimara Silva Viana Fagundes ◽  
Mariana Dadalto Peres ◽  
Fabrício Souza Pelição

Author(s):  
Emmyli Nunes de Freitas ◽  
Júlia do Carmo Santos ◽  
Giovana Escribano da Costa ◽  
SOLENA ZIEMER KUSMA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document