scholarly journals Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Fracture Repair in Dogs

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aasha Baderiya
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Repair ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Interlocking Nailing

The radiographic evaluation of repaired canine ilial fractures (69 cases)

2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 64-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Fitch ◽  
L. J. Wallace ◽  
C. S. Wells ◽  
J. K. Swiderski ◽  
L. A. Breshears
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Fracture Site ◽  
Fracture Repair ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Implant Loosening ◽  
Radiographic Outcome ◽  
Ventral Plate ◽  
Lateral Plate ◽  
Implant Complications

SummaryA retrospective radiographic evaluation of 69 canine ilial fractures was performed. The patient information, concurrent injuries, fracture description, implant characteristics, fixation, radiographic outcome, and complications were assessed. Ilial fracture repairs were divided into four groups: lateral plate only, lateral plate with ventral interfragmentary screws, lateral plate with ventral plate, and ventral plate only fixation. The number of screws, degree of purchase, use of oversized screws, presence of sacral penetration, alignment, apposition, and pelvic collapse were evaluated. Radiographic follow-up (> 4 weeks) was available in 42 of these cases. Radiographic complications were recognized in 24% of the cases. All implant complications were identified within the lateral component of the fixation, but not necessarily confined to the patients repaired with only a lateral plate. Repairs that utilized ventral fixation had significantly greater screw purchase while providing additional lag screw compression across the fracture site. Of the three groups utilizing ventral stabilization (25 repairs), only one case had implant loosening. Ventral screw fixation appears to provide additional rigidity to ilial fracture repair that may be beneficial in some cases. This report describes additional surgical repair options available for repair of canine ilial fractures.

Tibial fracture repair with angle‐stable interlocking nailing in 2 calves

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-606
Author(s):  
Danielle M. Marturello ◽  
Krista M. Gazzola ◽  
Loïc M. Déjardin
Keyword(s):  
Tibial Fracture ◽  
Fracture Repair ◽  
Interlocking Nailing ◽  
Angle Stable

Surgical Repair of Radial-Ulnar Fracture by Static Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing in a Crossbred Heifer

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (05) ◽  
pp. 373-378
Author(s):  
Ankit Narang ◽  
Simrat Singh ◽  
Pallavi Verma ◽  
Narinder Saini ◽  
Jitender Mohindroo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Fixation ◽  
Callus Formation ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Fracture Repair ◽  
Interlocking Nailing ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Ulnar Fracture ◽  
History Of ◽  
Distal Aspect

Abstract Objective Study included surgical management of radius and ulna fracture in a 2-year-old, 220 kg crossbred heifer presented with a 2-day-old history of injury resulting in severe, non-weight bearing lameness of the left forelimb. Methods The condition was diagnosed clinically and confirmed radiographically as a middle third oblique comminuted fracture of the left radius and ulna. Static intramedullary interlocking nailing was performed for fracture fixation. An interlocking nail of 12-mm diameter and 26-cm length was introduced in a retrograde manner from the distal aspect of the radius. Results The animal was able to bear weight on the affected limb within 7 days post surgery. Good callus formation and complete weight bearing were observed by 35th day. Bending of the screws and osteophytic reaction were the major postoperative complications observed radiographically. Clinical Significance From this case study, it was established that static intramedullary interlocking nailing can be used as an alternative technique for fracture repair of the radius and ulna in cattle where stable fracture fixation by bone plating is questionable.

Motion Analysis of the Cervical Spine

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Patrick R. Luers
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Intervertebral Disk ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Ligamentous Injury ◽  
Pattern Of Injury ◽  
Motion Segment ◽  
Single Pattern ◽  
Compensatory Motion ◽  
Loss Of Motion ◽  
Flexion And Extension

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, defines a motion segment as “two adjacent vertebrae, the intervertebral disk, the apophyseal or facet joints, and ligamentous structures between the vertebrae.” The range of motion from segment to segment varies, and loss of motion segment integrity is defined as “an anteroposterior motion of one vertebra over another that is greater than 3.5 mm in the cervical spine, greater than 2.5 mm in the thoracic spine, and greater than 4.5 mm in the lumbar spine.” Multiple etiologies are associated with increased motion in the cervical spine; some are physiologic or compensatory and others are pathologic. The standard radiographic evaluation of instability and ligamentous injury in the cervical spine consists of lateral flexion and extension x-ray views, but no single pattern of injury is identified in whiplash injuries. Fluoroscopy or cineradiographic techniques may be more sensitive than other methods for evaluating subtle abnormal motion in the cervical spine. The increased motion thus detected then must be evaluated to determine whether it represents normal physiologic motion, normal compensatory motion, motion related to underlying degenerative disk and/or facet disease, or increased motion related to ligamentous injury. Imaging studies should be performed and interpreted as instructed in the AMA Guides.

Dynamic Proximal Ulnar Osteotomy for the Treatment of Ununited Anconeal Process in 17 Dogs

1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 76-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Turner ◽  
R. H. Abercromby ◽  
J. Innes ◽  
W. M. McKee ◽  
M. G. Ness
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Proximal Ulna ◽  
Ulnar Osteotomy ◽  
A Prospective Study

SummaryA prospective study was made of 17 dogs with ununited anconeal process treated by osteotomy of the proximal ulna. The effect of the surgery on lameness was evaluated subjectively and the elbows were assessed radiographically for evidence of anconeal fusion and healing of the osteotomy. Whilst clinical outcome was generally good and complications infrequent, relatively few cases achieved anconeal fusion. These results do not compare well with the results of a previous study but this disparity may be due in part to differences in patient population and radiographic evaluation.Further work is required to establish how best to achieve predictable anconeal fusion.Proximal ulnar osteotomy was used to treat 17 dogs with ununited anconeal process. Clinical results were good but anconeal fusion was not achieved consistently. Further work is needed to determine how best to achieve predictable anconeal fusion.

Evaluation of Positive Contrast Arthrography in Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease

1996 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 10-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.N. Aron ◽  
R. Roberts ◽  
J. Stallings ◽  
J. Brown ◽  
C.W. Hay
Keyword(s):  
Articular Surface ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Positive Contrast ◽  
Joint Effusion ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Joint Pathology ◽  
Meniscal Pathology ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease ◽  
Better Than

SummaryArthrographic and intraoperative evaluations of stifles affected with cranial cruciate disease were compared. Arthrography did not appear to be helpful in predicting cranial cruciate ligament pathology. The caudal cruciate ligament was consistently not visualized in the arthrograms and was normal at surgery. The menisci were visualized consistently in the arthrograms, but conclusions could not be made as to the benefit of arthrography in predicting meniscal pathology. Arthrography was not helpful in predicting joint capsule and femoral articular surface pathology. Survey radiographic evaluation was better than arthrography in evaluating joint pathology. When cruciate injury is suspected, after history and physical examination, survey radiographs are better than positive contrast arthrograms at supporting the diagnosis.Positive contrast arthrography was evaluated as a diagnostic aid in canine cranial cruciate ligament disease. It did not appear to be useful in predicting joint pathology. With arthrography, both menisci could be visualized and evaluated for abnormalities. Joint effusion and presence of osteophytes evaluated on survey radiographs was better than arthrography in evaluating joint pathology.

Secondary Fractures Following Internal Fixation in Two Horses

1989 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. 125-128
Author(s):  
E. M. Gaughan ◽  
N. G. Duchar
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Proximal Phalanx ◽  
Fracture Repair ◽  
Fracture Line ◽  
Carpal Bone ◽  
Fracture Plane ◽  
The Third ◽  
Lag Screw ◽  
Secondary Fractures

SummaryImplant associated fractures have not been reported in horses. Two horses were evaluated for fractures in the fore limbs, occurring subsequent to previous fracture repair. Previously, the horses had sustained fractures of unusual configurations which were repaired using internal fixation. Following repair and healing of the fractures, secondary fractures occurred in the same bone, but in a different (more common) configuration. The first horse was evaluated ten months following lag screw fixation of a longitudinal fracture of the proximal phalanx in a frontal plane. This horse presented with a more typical comminuted fracture in the sagittal plane with the screws from the first fixation lying in the fracture line. This fracture was successfully treated with a cast. The second horse was examined eightteen months after repair of a medial sagittal slab fracture of the third carpal bone. The horse presented with a more typical dorsal slab fracture of the third carpal bone with the previously placed lag screw lying in the fracture line. The screw was removed and a lag screw was placed perpendicular to the new fracture plane through the dorsal surface of the third carpal bone to repair the fracture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document